Monica Probo

Dr. Monica Probo

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

17Years (2010-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 October 2018 in Journal of Dairy Science
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MPMonica Probo
Monica Probo
OPOsvaldo Bogado Pascottini
Osvaldo Bogado Pascottini
SLStephen LeBlanc
Stephen LeBlanc
GOG. Opsomer
G. Opsomer
Miel HostensMiel Hostens
Miel Hostens
The objective of this study was to assess the association between individual metabolic diseases (MD) and multiple MD (MD+) in the transition period (±3 wk relative to calving) and the culling risk in the first 120 d in milk (DIM) in Holstein-Friesian dairy cows. Health records from a transition management facility in Germany with 1,946 calvings were analyzed in a 1-yr cohort via survival analysis and a decision tree model. The recorded MD were milk fever (MF), retained placenta (RP), metritis (METR), ketosis (KET), displaced abomasum (DA), twinning (TWIN), and clinical mastitis (MAST). The overall culling within 120 DIM was 18%. The 120 DIM culling risk for healthy cows (64.8% of the total) was 13%, whereas it was 25% for MD (24.5%) and 33% for MD+ (10.7%) cows. The 120 DIM culling risk (%) for each MD and MD+, respectively, was 34.6 and 48 for MF and MF+, 15 and 31.5 for RP and RP+, 9.4 and 22.2 for METR and METR+, 30.7 and 37.3 for KET and KET+, 56.1 and 46.8 for DA and DA+, 30.3 and 34 for TWIN and TWIN+, and 36.6 and 27.8 for MAST and MAST+. Moreover, the incidence risk (%) for each MD and MD+, respectively, was 4 and 2.6 for MF and MF+, 1 and 2.8 for RP and RP+, 8.7 and 6 for METR and METR+, 4.5 and 6.1 for KET and KET+, 0.8 and 2.4 for DA and DA+, 1.7 and 2.7 for TWIN and TWIN+, and 3.6 and 1.8 for MAST and MAST+. Setting the healthy cows as the referent, the 120 DIM hazard ratios (HR) for culling were MD 2.1, MD+ 2.9, MF 3.3, MF+ 4.6, RP+ 2.7, METR+ 1.8, KET 2.6, KET+ 3.3, DA 5.5, DA+ 4.5, TWIN 2.8, TWIN+ 3.0, MAST 3.1, and MAST+ 2.3. According to both decision tree and random forest analyses, MF was the most significant disease influencing survival, followed by DA, MAST, METR, and TWIN. In conclusion, the presence of MD or MD+ during the transition period was associated with increased culling risk in the first 120 DIM. The culling hazard was greater when an MD was complicated with another MD. In this study performed in a well-managed large farm, uncomplicated cases of RP (HR = 1.2) and METR (HR = 0.7) did not have an influence on the 120 DIM culling risk. Interestingly, both decision tree and random forest analyses pointed to MF and DA as main culling reasons in the first 120 DIM in the present dairy herd.

1 October 2017 in Research in Veterinary Science
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PMPierangelo Moretti
Pierangelo Moretti
SPSaverio Paltrinieri
Saverio Paltrinieri
Erminio TrevisiErminio Trevisi
Erminio Trevisi
MPMonica Probo
Monica Probo
AFAnnarita Ferrari
Annarita Ferrari
AGAlessia Giordano
Alessia Giordano

1 March 2020 in Preventive Veterinary Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
OPOsvaldo Bogado Pascottini
Osvaldo Bogado Pascottini
MPMonica Probo
Monica Probo
SLStephen LeBlanc
Stephen LeBlanc
GOG. Opsomer
G. Opsomer
MHM. Hostens
M. Hostens

3 November 2022 in Animals
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MPMonica Probo
Monica Probo
MVMaria Cristina Veronesi
Maria Cristina Veronesi
A scoring system is an instrument that enables the scorers, including farmers, technicians, and veterinarians, to adopt a systematic approach for diagnosis or monitoring, as it decreases bias and confounding and increases objectivity. Practically, it is a number assigned to a patient that correlates with a probability that a diagnosis can be confirmed or that a specific outcome will follow. This article examines the clinical scores designed or adapted to bovine medicine that aim to assess newborn calf viability and to diagnose and monitor neonatal calf diarrhea and respiratory diseases, helping the clinician promptly recognize calves needing medical assistance. Despite the large number of clinical scores described in the literature, these are still barely used in farm animal practice; possibly, the complexity of the scores and missing recommendations for intervention are reasons for their lack of popularity as well as the crosswise lack of consistency among scores designed for the same purpose. Further research is needed in this regard to increase scores validation and encourage their application in bovine calf neonatology.

1 January 2015 in Animal Reproduction Science
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PMPierangelo Moretti
Pierangelo Moretti
MPMonica Probo
Monica Probo
NMNicola Morandi
Nicola Morandi
Erminio TrevisiErminio Trevisi
Erminio Trevisi
AFAnnarita Ferrari
Annarita Ferrari
AGAlessia Giordano
Alessia Giordano

1 May 2011 in Theriogenology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MVMaria Cristina Veronesi
Maria Cristina Veronesi
IAI. De Amicis
I. De Amicis
SPS. Panzani
S. Panzani
HKHans Kindahl
Hans Kindahl
NGNadia Govoni
Nadia Govoni
ACAugusto Carluccio
Augusto Carluccio