We report the performance of a field-scale permeable reactive barrier (PRB) for the biological treatment of nitrate-contaminated groundwater. The reactive material of the PRB consisted of a mixture of gravel and mulch as a carbon source for denitrifying bacteria. The PRB was equipped with a delivery system that allowed injecting NO3- at controlled rates from the surface directly into the up-gradient layer of the PRB. This way, NO3- concentration entering the PRB was varied (from 1 to 530 mg/L) with the purpose of evaluating the ultimate efficiency of the PRB under different NO3- loadings. The PRB was successful at removing NO3- from groundwater at inlet concentrations up to 280 mg/L (with NO3- removal percentages ≥97%). Monitoring of groundwater at different depths within the PRB provided evidence that NO3- underwent denitrification preferably at the deepest part of the PRB, where more favourable reducing conditions were achieved. Among the shortcomings of the PRB were the fluctuations of groundwater fluxes caused by intense rainfalls during the study period, although they generally did not pose concern for the denitrification capacity of the PRB. Emission fluxes of gases (CO2, CH4 and N2O) from the PRB to the atmosphere were also measured. The results are finally compared with the few others reported existing PRBs for nitrate-contaminated groundwater worldwide.
Three commercially available sorbents/exchangers (namely CsTreat, ZrP, and S910) were evaluated under column conditions for the extraction of four metals (Cs(I), Rb(I), Li(I), and U(VI)) from a brine rejected by a Seawater Reverse Osmosis plant. From the obtained breakthrough curves and periodic analysis of the influent and effluent, the uptake capacities of the materials were quantified. The fixation of the target metal onto the sorbents was investigated also by SEM-EDX and FTIR-ATR analysis. The results showed that CsTreat displayed a high sorption capacity of Rb(I) and a fairly high sorption capacity of Cs(I), as the resin S910 showed of U(VI), while ZrP proved to be ineffective for the retention of Li(I).
With the current increasing interest in aquifer denitrification, recent attention has been given to cost‐effective in‐situ treatments such as Enhanced In‐Situ Biological Denitrification (EISBD), which intends to stimulate the indigenous bacterial activity by injecting an external organic substrate and/or nutrients to the aquifer matrix. Within this context, laboratory batch assays have been conducted to develop a strategy for in‐situ denitrification of a nitrate‐contaminated aquifer in Argentona, Catalonia (Spain). The assays were run under aerobic and anaerobic conditions at a temperature of 17°C to better simulate the conditions of the aquifer. Acetate and glucose were added to assess their potential to promote heterotrophic denitrifying bacteria activity. Overall, the results revealed that indigenous micro‐organisms had the potential of reducing nitrate under appropriate conditions. Nitrate removal was complete and faster under anaerobic conditions, though high nitrate removals were also attained under initial aerobic conditions when a readily organic compound was amended at a sufficient dosage. The results also revealed that a significant amount of the available organic carbon was consumed by processes other than denitrification, namely aerobic oxidation and other microbial oxidation processes. To sum up, the results of this study demonstrated that addition of organic compounds into the groundwater is a promising method for in‐situ bioremediation of nitrate in the Argentona aquifer. This approach could potentially be applied to a number of situations in which nitrate concentration is elevated and where indigenous micro‐organisms with potential to reduce nitrate are present within the aquifer material.
Injection of zero-valent iron nanoparticles (nZVI) into aquifers has gained increasing attention of researchers for in-situ treatment of NO3--contaminated groundwater. nZVI has proved efficient in chemically reducing NO3- and, according to recent research efforts, in supporting biological denitrification under favoured conditions. Given the scarce research on nZVI pulsed injection in continuous-flow systems, the objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of nZVI pulses on the removal of NO3- from groundwater in packed soil columns and, more particularly, to elucidate whether or not biotic NO3- removal processes were promoted by nZVI. Three identical columns were filled with aquifer soil samples and fed with the same nitrate polluted groundwater but operated under different conditions: (A) with application of nZVI pulses and biocide spiked in groundwater, (B) without application of nZVI pulses and (C) with application of nZVI pulses. Results showed that the application of nZVI (at 30 mg/L and 78 mg/L doses) resulted in an immediate and sharp removal of NO3- (88-94%), accompanied by an increase in pH (from 7.0 to 9.0-10.0), a drop in redox potential (Eh) (from +420 mV to 98%) and the NO3- retention capacity of the nZVI particles (13.2-85.5 mg NO3-/g nZVI).
30 January 2013 in Environmental Science and Pollution Research