Indra Abeysekera

Prof. Indra Abeysekera

Charles Darwin University, Darwin, Northern Territory, Australia
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

23Years (2004-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
9 August 2016 in Journal of Business Ethics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
THTrang Cam Hoang
Trang Cam Hoang
Indra AbeysekeraIndra Abeysekera
Indra Abeysekera
SMShiguang Ma
Shiguang Ma

27 September 2022 in Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Indra AbeysekeraIndra Abeysekera
Indra Abeysekera
Purpose: A sustainability reporting framework must demonstrate that resources are fairly bought and used to support diverse life on earth within habitable ranges. The purpose of this paper is to propose a principle-based sustainability reporting framework that measures, audits and reports based on sustainability outcomes and impacts as part of the corporate reporting framework. Design/methodology/approach: This paper draws on the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (UN SDGs) and targets for preparing a reporting framework. It uses Gaia Theory and the Theory of Distributive Justice constructs that align with sustainable development principles to delineate a reporting approach. Findings: Frameworks that promote sustainability reporting have increasingly embraced UN SDGs but overly focus on performance promoting inter-firm comparisons. This framework introduces principle-based sustainability reporting where firms demonstrate their chosen contribution to sustainable development using 17 UN SDGs as goal posts. Research limitations/implications: This conceptual paper presents theoretical constructs that future research can empirically validate to enhance sustainability reporting. Practical implications: This principle-based sustainability reporting framework is implementable for corporate reporting, where sustainability reporting integrates with the financial and economic intellectual capital reporting frameworks. Social implications: This framework highlights the importance of acquiring and using resources to distribute justice and fairness. It is a joint project between firms and stakeholders. Originality/value: This framework promotes integrated thinking for firms to engage in principle-based sustainability reporting and provides a roadmap for sustainability reporting using the SDG Compass logic model.

2 January 2021 in Journal of International Financial Management & Accounting
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
YLYingjun Lu
Yingjun Lu
Indra AbeysekeraIndra Abeysekera
Indra Abeysekera

27 December 2016 in Australian Accounting Review
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
THTrang Cam Hoang
Trang Cam Hoang
Indra AbeysekeraIndra Abeysekera
Indra Abeysekera
SMShiguang Ma
Shiguang Ma


Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Indra AbeysekeraIndra Abeysekera
Indra Abeysekera
Over the past decade, the body of literature on intellectual capital and knowledge management has grown exponentially, responding to the growing knowledge-based and digital economy. This article reviews the concepts and applications proposed at the initial stages of the launch of these two research paradigms. It then examines the interconnection between the two. The study selected a set of articles on intellectual capital and knowledge management that forward concepts and applications vital to the inception of these two research domains. The analytical review demonstrates that these concepts and applications, although considered separately in research, are interconnected and inform each other. The paper analyzes, discusses, and forms conclusions based on the self-selected literature with informed research knowledge.