Huntington’s disease (HD) is one of the most disabling degenerative movement disorders, as it not only affects the motor system but also leads to cognitive disabilities and psychiatric symptoms. Deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the pallidum is a promising symptomatic treatment targeting the core motor symptom: chorea. This article gives an overview of preliminary evidence on pathophysiology, safety and efficacy of DBS in HD.

Background: Traditionally, cerebellar disorders including ataxias have been associated with deficits in motor control and motor learning. Since the 1980’s growing evidence has emerged that cerebellar diseases also impede cognitive and affective processes such as executive and linguistic functions, visuospatial abilities and regulation of emotion and affect. This combination of non-motor symptoms has been named Cerebellar Cognitive Affective/ Schmahmann Syndrome (CCAS). To date, diagnosis relies on non-standardized bedside cognitive examination and, if available, detailed neuropsychological test batteries. Recently, a short and easy applicable bedside test (CCAS Scale) has been developed to screen for CCAS. It has been validated in an US-American cohort of adults with cerebellar disorders and healthy controls. As yet, the CCAS Scale has only been available in American English. We present a German version of the scale and the study protocol of its ongoing validation in a German-speaking patient cohort. Methods: A preliminary German version has been created from the original CCAS Scale using a standardized translation procedure. This version has been pre-tested in cerebellar patients and healthy controls including medical experts and laypersons to ensure that instructions are well understandable, and that no information has been lost or added during translation. This preliminary German version will be validated in a minimum of 65 patients with cerebellar disease and 65 matched healthy controls. We test whether selectivity and sensitivity of the German CCAS Scale is comparable to the original CCAS Scale using the same cut-off values for each of the test items, and the same pass/ fail criteria to determine the presence of CCAS. Furthermore, internal consistency, test-retest and interrater reliability will be evaluated. In addition, construct validity will be tested in a subset of patients and controls in whom detailed neuropsychological testing will be available. Secondary aims will be examination of possible correlations between clinical features (e.g. disease duration, clinical ataxia scores) and CCAS scores. Perspective: The overall aim is to deliver a validated bedside test to screen for CCAS in German-speaking patients which can also be used in future natural history and therapeutic trials. Study registration: The study is registered at the German Clinical Study Register (DRKS-ID: DRKS00016854).

It is assumed that autoimmune limbic encephalitis (ALE) demonstrates distinct neuropsychological manifestations with differential responses to immunotherapy according to which associated autoantibody (AAB), if any, is identified. Towards investigating whether this is the case, this study aims to summarize respective findings from the primary literature on ALE with AABs binding to cell surface neural antigens and ALE with AABs against intracellular neural antigens. We chose ALE with AABs against leucine-rich, glioma inactivated protein 1 (LGI1) and contactin-associated protein-like 2 (CASPR2) as the most frequent cell surface membrane antigens, and ALE with AABs to Embryonic Lethal, Abnormal Vision, Like 1 (ELAVL) proteins (anti-Hu) and glutamic acid decarboxylase 65 (GAD65) as the most frequent intracellular neural antigens. The PubMed and Scopus databases were searched on March 1st, 2021 for neuropsychological test and -screening data from patients with ALE of these AAB-types. Findings were reviewed according to AAB-type and immunotherapy status and are presented in a review section and are further statistically evaluated and presented in a meta-analysis section in this publication. Of the 1304 initial hits, 32 studies on ALE with AABs against LGI1, CASPR2, and GAD65 reporting cognitive screening data could be included in a review. In ALE with AABs against LGI1, CASPR2 and GAD65, memory deficits are the most frequently reported deficits. However, deficits in attention and executive functions including working memory, fluency, and psychological function have also been reported. This review shows that ALE patients with AABs against both LGI1 and CASPR2 show higher percentages of neuropsychological deficits compared to ALE patients with AABs against GAD65 before and after initiation of immunotherapy. However, the methodologies used in these studies were heterogenous, and longitudinal studies were not comparable. Moreover, 21 studies including ALE patients with AABs against LGI1 and GAD65 were also suitable for meta-analysis. No suitable study on ALE with AABs against ELAVL proteins could be identified. Meta-Analyses could be executed for cognitive screening data and only partially, due to the small number of studies. However, in statistical analysis no consistent effect of AAB or immunotherapy on performance in cognitive screening tests could be found. Currently, there is no definite evidence supporting the notion that different AAB-types of ALE exhibit distinct neuropsychological manifestations and respond differently to immunotherapy. Overall, we could not identify evidence for any effect of immunotherapy on cognition in ALE. More systematic, in-depth and longitudinal neuropsychological assessments of patients with different AAB-types of ALE are required in the future to investigate these aspects.

Introduction: The efficacy of anti-CD20 antibodies has significantly contributed to advancing our understanding of disease pathogenesis and improved treatment outcomes in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS). A comprehensive analysis of the peripheral immune cell profile, combined with prospective clinical characterization, of RRMS patients treated with ocrelizumab (OCR) or ofatumumab (OFA) was performed to further understand immune reconstitution following B-cell depletion. Methods: REBELLION-MS is a longitudinal analysis of RRMS patients treated with either OCR (n = 34) or OFA (n = 25). Analysis of B, T, natural killer (NK) and natural killer T (NKT) cells at baseline, month 1, and 12 was performed by multidimensional flow cytometry. Data were analyzed by conventional gating and unsupervised computational approaches. In parallel, different clinical parameters were longitudinally assessed. Twenty treatment-naïve age/sex-matched RRMS patients were included as the control cohort. Results: B-cell depletion by OCR and OFA resulted in significant reductions in CD20⁺ T and B cells as well as B-cell subsets, alongside an expansion of CD5⁺CD19⁺CD20⁻ B cells, while also elevating exhaustion markers (CTLA-4, PD-1, TIGIT, TIM-3) across T, B, NK, and NKT cells. Additionally, regulatory T-cell (T_REG) numbers increased, especially in OCR-treated patients, and reductions in double-negative (CD3⁺CD4⁻CD8⁻) T cells (DN T cells) were observed, with these DN T cells having higher CD20 expression compared to CD4 or CD8 positive T cells. These immune profile changes correlated with clinical parameters, suggesting pathophysiological relevance in RRMS. Conclusions: Our interim data add weight to the argumentation that the exhaustion/activation markers, notably TIGIT, may be relevant to the pathogenesis of MS. In addition, we identify a potentially interesting increase in the expression of CD5+ on B cells. Finally, we identified a population of double-negative T cells (KLRG1+HLADR+, in particular) that is associated with MS activity and decreased with CD20 depletion.