Background: Low back pain syndrome is associated with muscular and myofascial pain and is linked with muscle overstrain or a lack of regular physical activity as well as a habitual bad posture, which cause the overload of perispinal soft tissues. One of the forms of therapy of LBP is the mesotherapy of the spine, which consists of multi-point micro-injections of drugs or medicine mixtures, which include preparations of collagen type I. The aim of the study was to assess the efficacy and safety of mesotherapy with collagen type I. Methods: A retrospective analysis of the results of the treatment of patients with chronic low back pain syndrome using mesotherapy was performed. A total of 130 patients (83 women and 47 men; mean age: 51 ± 14 years) were divided into two groups: group I (n = 65), treated with collagen type I, and group II (n = 65), treated with lignocaine 1%. Mesotherapy was performed weekly over five weeks. Patients were assessed using the following scales: the VAS, Laitinen Scale, and Revised Oswestry Low Back Pain Disability Scale before the start of the treatment, after five treatments, and at the three-month follow-up visit. Results: A statistically significant improvement was observed after the use of spinal mesotherapy both with collagen type I and lignocaine, with the collagen treatment having better results at the three-month follow-up visit. No adverse effects were observed after the procedures. Conclusions: Spinal mesotherapy using collagen type I and lignocaine seems to be an effective method in the treatment of chronic LBP. Collagen mesotherapy gives better results in the long term. Mesotherapy is a safe form of therapy.

Postoperative pain is common following spine surgery, particularly complex procedures. The main anesthetic efforts are focused on applying multimodal analgesia beforehand, and regional anesthesia is a critical component of it. The purpose of this study is to examine the existing techniques for regional anesthesia in cervical spine surgery and to determine their effect and safety on pain reduction and postoperative patient’s recovery. The electronic databases were searched for all literature pertaining to cervical nerve block procedures. The following peripheral, cervical nerve blocks were selected and described: paravertebral block, cervical plexus clock, paraspinal interfascial plane blocks such as multifidus cervicis, retrolaminar, inter-semispinal and interfacial, as well as erector spinae plane block and stellate ganglion block. Clinicians should choose more superficial techniques in the cervical region, as they have been shown to be comparably effective and less hazardous compared to paravertebral blocks

Back pain as a lifestyle disease

Sedentary lifestyles, work overload, and lack of regular physical activity are risk factors for spinal pain syndrome. In everyday medical practice, spinal pain syndrome of a muscular or myofascial, or non-neurogenic, nature is diagnosed. This problem affects a large group of patients and reaches about 70–80% of spinal pain cases. Usually, one of the primary treatments is with NSAIDs (Non-steroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs). In this case, one treatment method that is safe and has no side effects is spinal mesotherapy. This method consists of performing multi-point intradermal microinjections with the administration of drugs or medical devices. Based on a new perspective on the treatment of spinal pathology—the so-called three-stage treatment concept—it is necessary to deal with the risk factor(s) of spinal pain syndrome and reduce or at least modify them (stage I). This is followed by a broadly understood medical therapy, in this case spinal mesotherapy (stage II), which aims to relax tense tissues, improve mobility in the spine and thus reduce pain. As a result, conditions are created for the necessary process, which is rehabilitation in the broadest sense (stage III). Movement therapy, which is crucial in spinal pain syndrome, is performed with less pain, after obtaining better patient mobility. The purpose of this article is to evaluate the role of rehabilitation of patients after spinal mesotherapy in terms of the three-stage treatment concept for spinal pathology.

Greater trochanter pain syndrome (GTPS) occurs in a large group of patients. This problem can affect patients of any age and is associated with a sedentary, overloading, and non-ergonomic lifestyle/work with a concomitant lack of regular physical activity. The literature to date describes the effectiveness of various therapies. Glucocorticosteroid injections and physical therapy are used. One of the new methods is injection collagen therapy using collagen type I (COL-I), a protein of porcine origin, which aims, among other things, to regenerate inflammation-changed tendon. Various repair mechanisms are activated, including the induction and proliferation of fibroblasts, as well as their migration to the pathological site. This is followed by stimulation and synthesis of COL-I, secretion, and maturation. Ultimately, a regenerative effect is achieved. This article aims to discuss the role of COL-I in the injectable treatment of GTPS as a new therapeutic approach.

Melatonin is a relic, due to its millions-of-years-old presence in chemical reactions, found in evolutionarily diverse organisms. It has a multidirectional biological function. It controls diurnal rhythms, redox homeostasis, intestinal motor functions, mitochondrial biogenesis and fetal development and has antioxidant effects. It also has analgesic and therapeutic effects. The purpose of this paper is to describe the role of melatonin in vital processes occurring in interaction with the environment, with particular reference to various magnetic fields ubiquitous in the life of animate matter, especially radio frequency/extra low frequency (RF/ELF EMF) and static magnetic fields. The most important part of this article is to describe the potential effects of magnetic fields on melatonin secretion and the resulting possible health effects. Melatonin in some cases positively amplifies the electromagnetic signal, intensifying health effects, such as neurogenesis, analgesic effects or lowering blood pressure. In other cases, it is a stimulus that inhibits the processes of destruction and aggravation of lesions. Sometimes, however, in contrast to the beneficial effects of electromagnetic fields in therapy, they intensify pathogenic effects, as in multiple sclerosis by intensifying the inflammatory process.