This literature review summarizes the most recent and reliable evidence on post systems. A search was limited to review articles published over the last 10 years in dental journals with an impact factor. Papers cited in the initially retrieved review articles were also included if significant. Preservation of tooth tissue, presence of a ferrule effect, and adhesion are regarded as the most effective conditions for long‐term success of post‐endodontic restorations. Adhesively luted fibre‐reinforced composite post restorations have demonstrated satisfactory survival rates over relatively long follow‐up periods. The clinical effectiveness of such restorations has been mainly ascribed to the more biomimetic behaviour of fibre‐reinforced composite posts that reduces the risk of vertical root fractures. The most common type of failure when using fibre posts is post debonding and it is generally agreed that achieving stable adhesion to intraradicular dentine is more challenging than to coronal dentine. Several factors related to endodontic treatment, root canal shape, post space preparation, post translucency, adhesive cement handling and curing may have an influence on the outcome of the luting procedure. The most reliable results in fibre post cementation are obtained by etch‐and‐rinse adhesives in combination with dual‐cure resin cements. The use of self‐adhesive resin cements has also been proposed. Simplification is an obvious advantage of these new materials. However, the durability of their bond still needs to be verified with long‐term clinical studies. Several techniques for pre‐treating the fibre‐reinforced composite post surface have been tested with the aim of improving the bond strength at the post‐core and post‐cement interfaces. Silicoating followed by silanization currently appears to be the most effective and convenient method for this purpose. In conclusion, the available evidence validates the use of fibre posts as an alternative to metal posts and preferably to other tooth‐coloured posts, such as zirconia dowels, in the restoration of endodontically treated teeth. Longer term clinical trials are expected to further strengthen this evidence.

The interest on intraoral scanners for digital impressions has been growing and new devices are continuously introduced on the market. It is timely to verify whether the several scanners proposed for full-arch digital impressions have been tested under clinical conditions for validity, repeatability, reproducibility, as well as for time efficiency, and patient acceptance. An electronic search of the literature was conducted through PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Embase, entering the query terms ‘digital impression’, ‘intraoral digital impression’, ‘intraoral scanning’, ‘intraoral scanner’, ‘intraoral digital scanner’, combined by the Boolean operator ‘OR’. No language or time limitation was applied. Only studies where digital full-arch impressions had been recorded intraorally were considered. In only eight studies full-arch scans had been performed intraorally. Only four studies reported data on validity, repeatability, reproducibility of digital measurements and their samples were limited to subjects in complete permanent dentition. Only two intraoral scanners, Lava COS and iTero, were tested. Scanning times were measured in six studies and varied largely. Patients’ acceptance of intraoral scanning was evaluated in four studies, but it was not specifically assessed for children. The scientific evidence so far collected on intraoral scanning is neither exhaustive, nor up-to-date. Data from full-arch scans performed in children should be collected. For a meaningful assessment of time efficiency, agreement should be reached on the procedural steps to be included in the computation of scanning time.

This in vivo study examined the contribution of remaining coronal dentin and placement of a prefabricated (LP) or customized fiber post (ES) to the six-year survival of endodontically treated premolars. A sample of 345 patients provided 6 groups of 60 premolars each in need of endodontic treatment. Groups were classified according to the number of remaining coronal walls before abutment build-up. Within each group, teeth were allocated to one of three subgroups: (A) no post retention; (B) LP; or (C) ES (N = 20). All teeth were protected with a crown. Cox regression analysis revealed that fiber post retention significantly improved tooth survival (p < 0.001). Failure risk was lower in teeth restored with prefabricated (p = 0.001) than with customized posts (p = 0.009). Teeth with one (p = 0.004), two (p < 0.001), and three coronal walls (p < 0.001) had significantly lower failure risks than those without ferrule. Similar failure risks existed for teeth without coronal walls, regardless of the presence/absence of ferrule (p = 0.151). Regardless of the restorative procedure, the preservation of at least one coronal wall significantly reduced failure risk (ClinicalTrials.gov number CT01532947).