Paola D'Aloja

Dr. Paola D'Aloja

Istituto Superiore di Sanità, Rome, Lazio, Italy
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

30Years (1997-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
26 September 2019 in Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
AMAlice Maraschini
Alice Maraschini
Ilaria LegaIlaria Lega
Ilaria Lega
PDPaola D'Aloja
Paola D'Aloja
MBMarta Buoncristiano
Marta Buoncristiano
SDStefania Dell'ORo
Stefania Dell'ORo
TGthe Regional Obstetric Surveillance System Working Group
the Regional Obstetric Surveillance System Working Group

SDSerena Donati
Serena Donati
EDEdoardo Corsi Decenti
Edoardo Corsi Decenti
MSMichele Antonio Salvatore
Michele Antonio Salvatore
AMAlice Maraschini
Alice Maraschini
SBSilvia Bonassisa
Silvia Bonassisa
SZSara Zullino
Sara Zullino
The new coronavirus emergency spread to Italy when little was known about the infection’s impact on mothers and newborns. This study aims to describe the extent to which clinical practice has protected childbirth physiology and preserved the mother–child bond during the first wave of the pandemic in Italy. A national population-based prospective cohort study was performed enrolling women with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection admitted for childbirth to any Italian hospital from 25 February to 31 July 2020. All cases were prospectively notified, and information on peripartum care (mother–newborn separation, skin-to-skin contact, breastfeeding, and rooming-in) and maternal and perinatal outcomes were collected in a structured form and entered in a web-based secure system. The paper describes a cohort of 525 SARS-CoV-2 positive women who gave birth. At hospital admission, 44.8% of the cohort was asymptomatic. At delivery, 51.9% of the mothers had a birth support person in the delivery room; the average caesarean section rate of 33.7% remained stable compared to the national figure. On average, 39.0% of mothers were separated from their newborns at birth, 26.6% practised skin-to-skin, 72.1% roomed in with their babies, and 79.6% of the infants received their mother’s milk. The infants separated and not separated from their SARS-CoV-2 positive mothers both had good outcomes. At the beginning of the pandemic, childbirth raised awareness and concern due to limited available evidence and led to “better safe than sorry” care choices. An improvement of the peripartum care indicators was observed over time.

23 April 2021 in PLOS ONE
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SDSerena Donati
Serena Donati
MBMarta Buoncristiano
Marta Buoncristiano
Ilaria LegaIlaria Lega
Ilaria Lega
PDPaola D'Aloja
Paola D'Aloja
AMAlice Maraschini
Alice Maraschini
FGfor the ItOSS working group
for the ItOSS working group
In this before and after cross-sectional analysis, the authors aim to assess the impact of the bundle of research and training initiatives implemented between 2013 and 2018, and coordinated by the Italian Obstetric Surveillance System (ItOSS) to reduce obstetric haemorrhagic emergencies in five selected Italian Regions. To this purpose, the haemorrhagic Maternal Mortality Ratios (MMR) per 100,000 live births were estimated before and after implementing the bundle, through the ItOSS’s vital statistic linkage procedures and incident reporting and Confidential Enquiries. The research and training bundle was offered to all health professionals involved in pregnancy and birth care in the selected regions, representing 40% of national live births, and participating in the ItOSS audit cycle since its institution. The haemorrhagic MMR significantly decreased from 2.49/100,000 live births [95% CI 1.75 to 3.43] in the years 2007–2013 prior to the bundle implementation, to 0.77/100,000 live births [95% CI 0.31 to 1.58] in the years 2014–2018 after its implementation. According to the study results, the bundle of population-based initiatives might have contributed to reducing the haemorrhagic MMR in the participating regions, thus improving the quality of care of the major obstetric haemorrhage.

PDPaola D'Aloja
Paola D'Aloja
RCRoberto Da Cas
Roberto Da Cas
VBValeria Belleudi
Valeria Belleudi
FFFilomena Fortinguerra
Filomena Fortinguerra
FPFrancesca Romana Poggi
Francesca Romana Poggi
MGMoM-Net Group
MoM-Net Group
Ensuring drug safety for pregnant women through prescription drug monitoring is essential. The aim of this study was to describe the prescription pattern of medicines among pregnant immigrant women from countries with high migratory pressure (HMPCs) compared to pregnant Italian women. The prevalence of drug prescriptions among the two study populations was analysed through record linkage procedures applied to the administrative databases of eight Italian regions, from 2016 to 2018. The overall prevalence of drug prescription was calculated considering all women who received at least one prescription during the study period. Immigrants had a lower prevalence of drug prescriptions before (51.0% vs. 58.6%) and after pregnancy (55.1% vs. 60. 3%). Conversely, during pregnancy, they obtained a slightly higher number of prescriptions (74.9% vs. 72.8%). The most prescribed class of drugs was the blood and haematopoietic organs category (category ATC B) (56.4% vs. 45.9%, immigrants compared to Italians), followed by antimicrobials (31.3% vs. 33.7%). Most prescriptions were appropriate, while folic acid administration 3 months before conception was low for both study groups (3.9% immigrants and 6.2% Italians). Progesterone seemingly was prescribed against early pregnancy loss, more frequently among Italians (16.5% vs. 8.1% immigrants). Few inappropriate medications were prescribed among antihypertensives, statins and anti-inflammatory drugs in both study groups.

1 September 2021 in Epidemiologia & Prevenzione
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDPaola D'Aloja
Paola D'Aloja
MSMichele Antonio Salvatore
Michele Antonio Salvatore
LSLetizia Sampaolo
Letizia Sampaolo
MPMaria Grazia Privitera
Maria Grazia Privitera
SDSerena Donati
Serena Donati
PGPerinatal Mortality Surveillance System Working Group
Perinatal Mortality Surveillance System Working Group
To describe the methodology of a pilot perinatal mortality surveillance system (SPItOSS) aimed to improve quality of care and prevent avoidable perinatal severe morbidity and mortality in three Italian regions. population-based surveillance project monitoring incident cases of stillbirths, born dead ≥ 28 weeks of gestation and live births dying within 7 days. Local multidisciplinary audits in obstetric and neonatal units were conducted to assess causes of each death. A selection of deaths was also discussed by experts in regional and national Confidential Enquiries to assess causes and avoidability. The WHO perinatal mortality definition and the ICD-PM classification were adopted to codify perinatal deaths. health professionals working in any obstetric and neonatal unit in Lombardy (Northern Italy), Tuscany (Central Italy), and Sicily (Southern Italy), accounting for 32.3% of births in Italy. Data collection started on 01.07.2017 and ended on 30.06.2019. obstetric and neonatal units' participation rate in the participating regions, facility structural organisation description, health professionals' training course participation, estimate of perinatal death rates, clinical audits and Confidential Enquiries rates. health professionals from all obstetric and/or neonatal units (N. 138) joined the pilot project. Overall, 830 incident perinatal deaths were reported; 699 underwent a facility-based clinical audit, and 94 selected cases were analysed in detail through regional and national Confidential Enquiries. Among the latter, 16.0% were assessed as avoidable deaths. Interregional differences related to the facility structural organisation were identified. SPItOSS was efficient in identifying and analysing incident cases of perinatal deaths and detecting improvable aspects of care and avoidable perinatal deaths. The next objective is to extend the surveillance at the national level, considering that stable funding and a higher number of participating healthcare professionals and experts will be needed.

28 October 2020 in Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDPaola D'Aloja
Paola D'Aloja
AMAlice Bs Maraschini
Alice Bs Maraschini
ILIlaria Lega
Ilaria Lega
SASilvia Andreozzi
Silvia Andreozzi
LSLetizia Sampaolo
Letizia Sampaolo
SDSerena Donati
Serena Donati
Introduction: Distance learning efficacy on physician performances and patient health outcomes has been demonstrated. This study explored the participation and evaluation of CME e-learning courses for Italian health care professionals addressing leading causes of maternal mortality identified by the Italian Obstetric Surveillance System (ItOSS) at the Italian National Health Institute, namely postpartum hemorrhage and pregnancy hypertensive disorders. Methods: A model for two online free 12-hour case-based training courses was used. Data on participants were collected, anonymized, and transferred to the Italian National Health Institute for later analysis. Participants were requested to sign an online informed consent form. Results: Twenty-one thousand five hundred thirty-two health care professionals enrolled to the courses from 2014 to 2017 as follows: midwives (14,187, 65.9%); obstetricians (3,716, 17.2%); anesthesiologists (1,896, 8.8%); and other medical specialists (1,733, 8.0%). Overall, 85% of participants acquired CME credits. Participants' satisfaction on quality, efficacy, and relevance was very high. Discussion: ItOSS courses were able to reach a substantial number of different professional profiles involved in perinatal care all over the country; ItOSS courses can be considered an effective way to spread evidence-based good clinical practices. Nevertheless, further studies are needed to verify the improvement in professional health care skills and patient outcomes.