To describe the methodology of a pilot perinatal mortality surveillance system (SPItOSS) aimed to improve quality of care and prevent avoidable perinatal severe morbidity and mortality in three Italian regions. population-based surveillance project monitoring incident cases of stillbirths, born dead ≥ 28 weeks of gestation and live births dying within 7 days. Local multidisciplinary audits in obstetric and neonatal units were conducted to assess causes of each death. A selection of deaths was also discussed by experts in regional and national Confidential Enquiries to assess causes and avoidability. The WHO perinatal mortality definition and the ICD-PM classification were adopted to codify perinatal deaths. health professionals working in any obstetric and neonatal unit in Lombardy (Northern Italy), Tuscany (Central Italy), and Sicily (Southern Italy), accounting for 32.3% of births in Italy. Data collection started on 01.07.2017 and ended on 30.06.2019. obstetric and neonatal units' participation rate in the participating regions, facility structural organisation description, health professionals' training course participation, estimate of perinatal death rates, clinical audits and Confidential Enquiries rates. health professionals from all obstetric and/or neonatal units (N. 138) joined the pilot project. Overall, 830 incident perinatal deaths were reported; 699 underwent a facility-based clinical audit, and 94 selected cases were analysed in detail through regional and national Confidential Enquiries. Among the latter, 16.0% were assessed as avoidable deaths. Interregional differences related to the facility structural organisation were identified. SPItOSS was efficient in identifying and analysing incident cases of perinatal deaths and detecting improvable aspects of care and avoidable perinatal deaths. The next objective is to extend the surveillance at the national level, considering that stable funding and a higher number of participating healthcare professionals and experts will be needed.

Background: Chronic pain (CP) prevalence estimates addressing a wide phenotype are still quite fragmented and may vary widely due to the lack of standardized tools of investigation. There is an urgent need to update general population CP estimates. Methods: For this purpose, the Brief Five-item Chronic Pain Questionnaire was developed through experts’ consultations for design and content validity assessment; literature analysis of measures used to investigate CP for general population surveys; understandability evaluation through a survey on a convenience sample of affected and non-affected individuals; reliability assessment by means of two double-wave online surveys carried out by the Italian Twin Registry; criterion and construct validity assessment through the third wave of the 2019 European Health Interview Survey (Ehis). Results: Key dimensions were defined to describe CP main aspects from a public health perspective. Literature analysis showed that validated questionnaires were rarely used to address important public health CP aspects. Understandability of the measure was good. Test-retest analyses showed adequate reliability of the measure: k values were at least “moderate” with highest values regarding CP “occurrence” and “intensity”. Correlations of CP with well-known comorbidities (cancer, depression), and specific traits (age, education) as well as of CP and its intensity with “physical pain occurrence and intensity” detected in the Ehis 2019, confirmed, respectively, a good construct and criterion validity. Construct validity was also evaluated through the correlation between “perceived treatment effectiveness” and “interference of pain in daily life activities” as recorded in the Ehis 2019. Conclusion: The designed questionnaire is a brief self-administered measure, particularly suitable to detect persistent states of pain and related intensity in large-scale general population surveys by means of a first filtering item followed by four further items. It is, in fact, designed to detect CP possible underlying causes/triggers, drugs/treatments taking and frequency, and self-perceived effectiveness among CP sufferers. Further validation of the measure in different social and cultural contexts is desirable.

Registries require standardized component libraries based on predefined taxonomies to ensure detailed and structured descriptions of implanted devices, enabling effective monitoring of implant safety. Considering the growing use of spinal implantable devices, we aimed to propose a comprehensive classification framework for spinal devices, to be integrated into the Italian Spine registry framework. The taxonomy was created using a detailed process that included reviewing existing literature, analyzing technical documents, selecting important device characteristics, obtaining feedback from manufacturers, and converting the information into a format suitable for IT systems. Our findings showed the lack of a globally accepted classification system. We identified four primary categories, further refined into subcategories, complemented by attributes for device identification, traceability, and characterization, then structured them using XSD schemas. Our proposal represents the first known attempt to implement a taxonomy for spinal implants, with the potential to serve as an international reference. A structured classification system would enhance registry interoperability, facilitate cross-registry comparability, and improve the early detection of adverse events, thereby strengthening patient safety and clinical outcomes. Furthermore, the adoption of a unified classification framework would improve surgeons’ clinical practice and support policymakers in developing early prevention strategies, ultimately improving patient care.

Prevention and health promotion are strictly linked to the health literacy of population and to the theme of equity and social determinants. The aim of this study is to assess the associations between socioeconomic determinants and behavioural risk factors and cervical, breast and colorectal...