Simone Ambretti

Prof. Simone Ambretti

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

12Years (2015-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
6 May 2022 in Antibiotics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Paolo GaibaniPaolo Gaibani
Paolo Gaibani
Tommaso GianiTommaso Giani
Tommaso Giani
FBFederica Bovo
Federica Bovo
DLDonatella Lombardo
Donatella Lombardo
SAStefano Amadesi
Stefano Amadesi
SASimone Ambretti
Simone Ambretti
Multidrug resistance (MDR) represents a serious global threat due to the rapid global spread and limited antimicrobial options for treatment of difficult-to-treat (DTR) infections sustained by MDR pathogens. Recently, novel β-lactams/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations (βL-βLICs) have been developed for the treatment of DTR infections due to MDR Gram-negative pathogens. Although novel βL-βLICs exhibited promising in vitro and in vivo activities against MDR pathogens, emerging resistances to these novel molecules have recently been reported. Resistance to novel βL-βLICs is due to several mechanisms including porin deficiencies, increasing carbapenemase expression and/or enzyme mutations. In this review, we summarized the main mechanisms related to the resistance to ceftazidime/avibactam, meropenem/vaborbactam and imipenem/relebactam in MDR Gram-negative micro-organisms. We focused on antimicrobial activities and resistance traits with particular regard to molecular mechanisms related to resistance to novel βL-βLICs. Lastly, we described and discussed the main detection methods for antimicrobial susceptibility testing of such molecules. With increasing reports of resistance to novel βL-βLICs, continuous attention should be maintained on the monitoring of the phenotypic traits of MDR pathogens, into the characterization of related mechanisms, and on the emergence of cross-resistance to these novel antimicrobials.

13 August 2019 in Antimicrobial Resistance & Infection Control
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SASimone Ambretti
Simone Ambretti
MBMatteo Bassetti
Matteo Bassetti
PCPierangelo Clerici
Pierangelo Clerici
Nicola PetrosilloNicola Petrosillo
Nicola Petrosillo
FTFabio Tumietto
Fabio Tumietto
Gian Maria RossoliniGian Maria Rossolini
Gian Maria Rossolini
A variety of national and international guidelines exist around the management of carbapenem resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CREs), but some of these are several years old and do not reflect current epidemiology and they also do not necessarily give pragmatic advice around active surveillance of CREs in countries with a high burden of cases and limited resources. This paper aims to provide a best practice position paper to guide active surveillance in a variety of scenarios in these settings, and discusses which patients should be screened, what methods could be used for screening, and how results might influence infection prevention interventions. This paper was developed as a result of a series of meetings of expert opinion leaders representing the major infectious disease and infection prevention societies in Italy and having the endorsement of AMCLI (Italian Association of Clinical Microbiology) and SITA (Italian Society for Anti-infective Therapy). There was no attempt to undertake a full systematic review of the evidence, as it was felt that this was inadequate to inform a pragmatic view on the best way forward based on current epidemiology and infection rates. Key recommendations focus on the urgent need to promote measures to prevent transmission and infection, focusing on high risk patients and clinical areas, as well as outbreak situations. Active surveillance leading to appropriate infection prevention precautions plays a major role in this. There are limited national or international guidelines giving pragmatic advice on the most appropriate measures for active surveillance and management of colonized patients in a high-burden setting such as Italy. While individual hospitals and regions will need to formulate their own policies based on local epidemiology, this position paper attempts to highlight current best practice in this area and provide pragmatic advice for clinicians, infection prevention staff, and healthcare managers.

6 May 2021 in Antibiotics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Paolo GaibaniPaolo Gaibani
Paolo Gaibani
DLDonatella Lombardo
Donatella Lombardo
LBLinda Bussini
Linda Bussini
FBFederica Bovo
Federica Bovo
BMBeatrice Munari
Beatrice Munari
SASimone Ambretti
Simone Ambretti
Meropenem/Vaborbactam (MEM-VAB) is a novel carbapenem- β-lactamase inhibitor active against KPC-producing Enterobacteria. Herein, we evaluate the incidence of meropenem/vaborbactam-resistance among KPC-producing K. pneumoniae (KPC-Kp) bloodstream infection in a large Italian hospital. Meropenem/vaborbactam-resistance was found in 8% (n = 5) KPC-Kp, while 5% (n = 3) strains exhibited cross-resistance to ceftazidime/avibactam (CAZ-AVI). Genomic analysis revealed that meropenem/vaborbactam-resistance was associated with truncated OmpK35 and insertion of glycine and aspartic acid within OmpK36 at position 134–135 (GD134–135). Notably, no specific mutation was associated to cross-resistance. No specific antimicrobial treatment was related to favorable clinical outcomes, while cross-resistance was not associated to higher clinical and/or microbiological failures. Our study indicated that resistance to meropenem/vaborbactam was due to porins mutations and is associated with reduced susceptibility to both ceftazidime/avibactam and carbapenems.

11 May 2022 in Anaerobe
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Stefano Di BellaStefano Di Bella
Stefano Di Bella
RARoberta Maria Antonello
Roberta Maria Antonello
GSGianfranco Sanson
Gianfranco Sanson
Alberto MaraoloAlberto Maraolo
Alberto Maraolo
Daniele Roberto GiacobbeDaniele Roberto Giacobbe
Daniele Roberto Giacobbe
Luigi PrincipeLuigi Principe
Luigi Principe

6 September 2022 in Journal of Microbiological Methods
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MCMiriam Cordovana
Miriam Cordovana
NMNorman Mauder
Norman Mauder
OJOlivier Join-Lambert
Olivier Join-Lambert
FGFrançois Gravey
François Gravey
SLSimon LeHello
Simon LeHello
MKMarkus Kostrzewa
Markus Kostrzewa

20 September 2022 in Microorganisms
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
FMFrancesca Miselli
Francesca Miselli
RCRiccardo Cuoghi Costantini
Riccardo Cuoghi Costantini
RCRoberta Creti
Roberta Creti
FSFrancesca Sforza
Francesca Sforza
SFSilvia Fanaro
Silvia Fanaro
ABAlberto Berardi
Alberto Berardi
The widespread use of intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis (IAP) to prevent group B streptococcus (GBS) early-onset sepsis (EOS) is changing the epidemiology of EOS. Italian prospective area-based surveillance data (from 1 January 2016 to 31 December 2020) were used, from which we identified 64 cases of culture-proven EOS (E. coli, n = 39; GBS, n = 25) among 159,898 live births (annual incidence rates of 0.24 and 0.16 per 1000, respectively). Approximately 10% of E. coli isolates were resistant to both gentamicin and ampicillin. Five neonates died; among them, four were born very pre-term (E. coli, n = 3; GBS, n = 1) and one was born full-term (E. coli, n = 1). After adjustment for gestational age, IAP-exposed neonates had ≥95% lower risk of death, as compared to IAP-unexposed neonates, both in the whole cohort (OR 0.04, 95% CI 0.00–0.70; p = 0.03) and in the E. coli EOS cohort (OR 0.05, 95% CI 0.00–0.88; p = 0.04). In multi-variable logistic regression analysis, IAP was inversely associated with severe disease (OR = 0.12, 95% CI 0.02–0.76; p = 0.03). E. coli is now the leading pathogen in neonatal EOS, and its incidence is close to that of GBS in full-term neonates. IAP reduces the risk of severe disease and death. Importantly, approximately 10% of E. coli isolates causing EOS were found to be resistant to typical first-line antibiotics.