Marco Vivarelli

Prof. Marco Vivarelli

Department of Economic Policy, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, 20123 Milano MI, Italy
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

36Years (1991-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications

15 February 2011 in Liver International
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Gianluca Svegliati-BaroniGianluca Svegliati-Baroni
Gianluca Svegliati-Baroni
SSStefania Saccomanno
Stefania Saccomanno
CRChiara Rychlicki
Chiara Rychlicki
LALaura Agostinelli
Laura Agostinelli
SMSamuele De Minicis
Samuele De Minicis
Amalia GastaldelliAmalia Gastaldelli
Amalia Gastaldelli

17 May 2007 in Industrial and Corporate Change
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
ESEnrico Santarelli
Enrico Santarelli
MVMarco Vivarelli
Marco Vivarelli
This survey article aims at critically discussing the recent literature on firm formation and survival and the growth of new-born firms. The basic purpose is to single out the microeconomic entrepreneurial foundations of industrial dynamics (entry and exit) and to characterise the founder's ex-ante features in terms of likely ex-post business performance. The main conclusion is that entry of new firms is heterogeneous with innovative entrepreneurs being found together with passive followers, over-optimist gamblers and even escapees from unemployment. Since founders are heterogeneous and may make “entry mistakes,” policy incentives should be highly selective, favouring nascent entrepreneurs endowed with progressive motivation and promising predictors of better business performance. This would lead to the least distortion in the post-entry market selection of efficient entrepreneurs.

11 November 2008 in American Journal of Transplantation
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Matteo RavaioliMatteo Ravaioli
Matteo Ravaioli
Gian Luca GraziGian Luca Grazi
Gian Luca Grazi
FPFabio Piscaglia
Fabio Piscaglia
FTF. Trevisani
F. Trevisani
MCM. Cescon
M. Cescon
APA. D. Pinna
A. D. Pinna
Conventional criteria for liver transplantation for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma are single HCC ≤ 5 cm or less than or equal to three HCCs ≤ 3 cm. We prospectively evaluated the possibility of slightly extending these criteria in a down-staging protocol, which included patients initially outside conventional criteria: single HCC 5–6 cm or two HCCs ≤ 5 cm or less than six HCCs ≤ 4 cm and sum diameter ≤ 12 cm, but within Milan criteria in the active tumors after the down-staging procedures. The outcome of patients down-staged was compared to that of Milan criteria after liver transplantation and since the first evaluation according to an intention-to-treat principle. From 2003 to 2006, 177 patients with HCC were considered for transplantation: the transplantation rate was comparable between the Milan and down-staging groups: 88/129 cases (68%) versus 32/48 cases (67%), respectively. At a median follow-up of 2.5 years after transplantation, the 1 and 3 years' disease-free survival rates were comparable: 80% and 71% in the Milan group versus 78% and 71% in the down-staging. The actuarial intention-to-treat survival was 27/48 patients (56.3%) in the down-staging and 81/129 cases (62.8%) in the Milan group, p = n.s. The proposed down-staging criteria provide a comparable outcome to the conventional criteria.

6 March 2019 in Liver International
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
UCUmberto Cillo
Umberto Cillo
CFConstantino Fondevila
Constantino Fondevila
MDMatteo Donadon
Matteo Donadon
Enrico GringeriEnrico Gringeri
Enrico Gringeri
FMFederico Mocchegiani
Federico Mocchegiani
BKBas Groot Koerkamp
Bas Groot Koerkamp
Surgical resection is the only potentially curative treatment for patients with cholangiocarcinoma. For both perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (pCCA) and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA), 5‐year overall survival of about 30% has been reported in large series. This review addresses several challenges in surgical management of cholangiocarcinoma. The first challenge is diagnosis: a biopsy is typically avoided because of the risk of seeding metastases and the low yield of a brush of the bile duct. However, about 15% of patients with suspected pCCA are found to have a benign diagnosis after resection. The second challenge is staging; even with the best preoperative imaging, a substantial percentage of patients has occult metastatic disease detected at staging laparoscopy or early recurrence after resection. The third challenge is an adequate volume and function of the future liver remnant, which may require preoperative biliary drainage and portal vein embolization. The fourth challenge is a complete resection: a positive bile duct margin is not uncommon because the microscopic biliary extent of disease may be more extensive than perceived on imaging. The fifth challenge is the high post‐operative mortality that has decreased in very high volume Asian centres, but remains about 10% in many Western referral centres. The sixth challenge is that even after a complete resection most patients develop recurrent disease. Recent randomized controlled trials found conflicting results regarding the benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy. The final challenge is to determine which patients with cholangiocarcinoma should undergo liver transplantation rather than resection.

1 February 2009 in World Development
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
EMElena Meschi
Elena Meschi
MVMarco Vivarelli
Marco Vivarelli