Resumo O estresse de minoria aborda a relação entre preconceito (percebido, antecipado e internalizado) e saúde mental em pessoas pertencentes a grupos minoritários, assim como fatores de proteção aos estressores. Este trabalho avaliou a prevalência de sintomas depressivos, ideação suicida e tentativa de suicídio em pessoas trans brasileiras, e sua relação com estresse de minoria, passabilidade, apoio social e apoio à identidade trans. Participaram 378 pessoas, por meio de questionário respondidos on-line e nos serviços hospitalares a que frequentavam. Desses, 67,20% apresentaram sintomas depressivos, 67,72% ideação suicida e 43,12% tentativa de suicídio. Foram realizadas três análises de regressão de Poisson, em dois passos, conforme os desfechos. Nos três desfechos houve associação positiva com o preconceito internalizado e negativa com o apoio social, sendo essas as únicas associações na tentativa de suicídio. Nos sintomas depressivos e na ideação suicida, também se associou positivamente o preconceito antecipado e negativamente a passabilidade e o apoio à identidade trans. Percebe-se a vulnerabilidade das pessoas trans para os desfechos negativos de saúde mental e a importância de enfrentar o preconceito em nível individual e social, assim como promover o apoio social e à identidade trans.

Objective: to describe attributes associated with the Quality of Life of Brazilian transgender children and adolescents according to their own perception. Method: descriptive study conducted with 32 participants between eight and 18 years old, who were either interviewed or participated in focus groups. The statements were transcribed, grouped with the aid of the Interface de R pour les Analyses Multidimensionnelles de Textes et de Questionnaires software, version 0.7 alpha 2 and described according to the definition of Quality of Life by the World Health Organization concerning to the mental, physical, and social dimensions. Results: it was possible to identify the family nucleus as the main social support for transgender children and adolescents. However, the experience of prejudice and discrimination were negative attributes associated with Quality of Life. Conclusion: the statements indicate that lives of transgender children and adolescents are impacted by social, physical, and mental factors due to the stigma and discrimination experienced. It is expected to contribute to the formulation of public policies related to transgender children and adolescents and expand the discussion on the citizens’ duties and rights in relation to transsexuality.

This cross-sectional exploratory study aims to verify associations between condom-protected sex, condom negotiation self-efficacy, self-esteem, and four minority stressors (experiences with misgendering, “passing” concerns, anticipated prejudice, and perceived prejudice) among transgender men (TM) and transgender women (TW). 260 individuals (192 TW and 68 TM) residing in two Brazilian states participated in the study. Data was collected online and in two hospital programs for transgender people and included sociodemographic data, condom-protected sex, the Trans-Specific Condom/Barrier Negotiation Self-Efficacy (T-Barrier) Scale, the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale, and four minority stressors. Measures that were significantly associated with condom-protected sex were tested as independent variables in a linear regression model. The main results suggest that lower condom negotiation self-efficacy, higher “passing” concerns, and higher experiences with misgendering were predictors of lower frequency of condom-protected sex. These negative outcomes were found among both TM and TW, which justifies their inclusion in public health policies. Structural strategies and clinical interventions are suggested to address condom negotiation self-efficacy and “passing” concerns in transgender populations.

Transgender youth and their caregivers are rarely included in regulatory processes concerning gender-affirming care, despite being directly affected. In April 2025, the Brazilian Federal Council of Medicine (CFM) issued Resolution 2.427/2025, which banned the use of puberty blockers in all minors, prohibited hormone therapy before age 18, and introduced stricter age thresholds for surgical interventions. This study aimed to assess stakeholder perspectives regarding these new restrictions. We conducted a cross-sectional survey between May and June 2025 with patients and caregivers from Brazil’s largest outpatient gender identity service. A total of 54 transgender youth (mean age 13.6 ± 2.0 years) and 116 caregivers completed the survey independently. Participants rated their level of agreement with each provision of the resolution using a 6-point Likert scale. Findings demonstrated overwhelming opposition to the new regulations. Among youth, 92.6% strongly disagreed with the ban on puberty blockers, 94.4% opposed restrictions on hormone therapy before 18, and 59.3% disagreed with surgical age limits. Caregivers reported similar opposition, with 93.1% rejecting the ban on puberty blockers, 89.7% rejecting restrictions on hormone therapy, and 61.2% disagreeing with surgical restrictions. Importantly, opposition was consistent across all stages of treatment engagement, including among those who had not initiated or had declined medical interventions, suggesting that disagreement is not solely attributable to personal investment in treatment. These findings highlight a substantial misalignment between regulatory policy and the perspectives of directly affected youth and families. Incorporating patient and caregiver voices, alongside clinical evidence, is essential to ensure that policies remain ethically sound and responsive to stakeholder needs. Public significance statement: This study found that over 90% of transgender youth and their caregivers in Brazil strongly oppose new bans on gender-affirming medical care, revealing a significant disconnect between regulatory policies and the lived experiences of those most affected. These findings underscore the critical importance of incorporating patient and family perspectives into healthcare policy to ensure it is both ethical and effective.