Chikumbusko Kaonga

Dr. Chikumbusko Kaonga


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

12Years (2015-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
22 August 2020 in Environmental Monitoring and Assessment
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
CKCharity Kanyika-Mbewe
Charity Kanyika-Mbewe
BTBenard Thole
Benard Thole
Rodgers MakwinjaRodgers Makwinja
Rodgers Makwinja
CKChikumbusko Kaonga
Chikumbusko Kaonga

25 September 2017 in International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
CKChikumbusko Kaonga
Chikumbusko Kaonga
RCR. C. G. Chidya
R. C. G. Chidya
IKI. B. M. Kosamu
I. B. M. Kosamu
SAS. M. Abdel-Dayem
S. M. Abdel-Dayem
HMH. W. T. Mapoma
H. W. T. Mapoma
HSH. Sakugawa
H. Sakugawa

8 July 2019 in International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
LKL. L. J. Kamzati
L. L. J. Kamzati
CKChikumbusko Kaonga
Chikumbusko Kaonga
HMH. W. T. Mapoma
H. W. T. Mapoma
FTF. G. Thulu
F. G. Thulu
SAS. M. Abdel-Dayem
S. M. Abdel-Dayem
HSH. Sakugawa
H. Sakugawa

30 September 2017 in African Journal of Environmental Science and Technology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
CKChikumbusko Kaonga
Chikumbusko Kaonga
BIBobbyMphangwe Kosamu Ishmael
BobbyMphangwe Kosamu Ishmael
DDDinah Lakudzala Deliwe
Dinah Lakudzala Deliwe
MRMbewe Rex
Mbewe Rex
TBThole Benard
Thole Benard
MSMkali Idruss Sajidu Samson
Mkali Idruss Sajidu Samson
Growth of cities in developing countries comes with increasing transportation and industrial activities which may contribute to accumulation of heavy metals in the environment. This paper provides a review of studies on heavy metals in Malawi`s environment, their potential environmental impacts and possible removal methods with comparisons to other selected countries. The reviewed data from Malawi showed that in water samples, heavy metal concentrations were higher than World Health Organisation (WHO) and Malawi Bureau of Standards (MBS) safe limits especially in streams passing through industrial sites. Reports of heavy metals (especially Cu, Mn and Zn) showed that in industrial effluents, the individual levels of each of them were at least 6 times higher as compared to those in surface water bodies. In rivers there was accumulation of heavy metals (Cu, Cd, Cr, Fe, Mn, Pb, Ni and Zn) by algae whereby bioconcentration factors (BCF) ranged from 1.0 to 42 in some of the studies. Generally, metal levels in soils and selected organisms were much higher than those in water samples which further confirm possible accumulation. Since some aquatic organisms are consumed by humans, there is potential for the heavy metals to cause cancer and kidney damage. The studies done in Malawi compared well to those conducted elsewhere. The degradation of water resources by heavy metals compromises sustainability of water bodies and vital aquatic ecosystems hence negatively impacting on Integrated Water Resource Management (IWRM) efforts. This calls for periodic heavy metal monitoring and identifying ways of reducing their release into the environment. Key words: Environment, heavy metals, pollution, public health, Malawi.

9 June 2024 in Discover Environment
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
GDGunseyo Dickson Dzinjalamala
Gunseyo Dickson Dzinjalamala
CKChikumbusko Kaonga
Chikumbusko Kaonga
SKSave Kumwenda
Save Kumwenda
IKIshmael Bobby Mphangwe Kosamu
Ishmael Bobby Mphangwe Kosamu
FTFabiano Gibson Daud Thulu
Fabiano Gibson Daud Thulu
HSHiroshi Sakugawa
Hiroshi Sakugawa
This study assessed nutrients and microbial contamination in water and soil samples from Chileka Township, Blantyre City, Malawi. Elevated total and fecal coliforms (1300 cfu/100 mL and 290 cfu/100 mL) in groundwater (GW), and (34,000 cfu/100 mL and 8000 cfu/100 mL) in surface water (SW) were found, representing a risk of exposure to water-borne disease. While the criteria in the Malawi Standard for raw groundwater was mostly met, water from only 20% of the boreholes complied with the WHO requirements. Nitrate (NO3─) and Cl─ (47.8 mg/L and 263 mg/L) exceeded the WHO limits in GW. Cadmium (Cd) occurred in a few cases at concentrations up to 0.217 mg/L and 0.138 mg/L in GW and SW. Lead (Pb) and Cr were below detection limits, while Mn (0.319 mg/L and 0.640 mg/L) in GW and SW, and Fe (6.92 mg/L) in SW compromised taste. Though bacteriologically unfit for raw consumption by humans, both GW and SW chemically met FAO-acceptable limits for irrigation, and standards for livestock watering. The NO3─ and PO43─ maximum concentrations in soil were 58.9 mg/kg and 506 mg/kg, respectively. Lead (Pb) and Cd were not detected whereas Cr, Zn, Cu, Mn and Fe in soil were 27.7 mg/kg, 190 mg/kg, 60.4 mg/kg, 1307 mg/kg and 6552 mg/kg, respectively. Magnesium (Mg), Ca, Na and K were 20,523 mg/kg, 22,334 mg/kg, 544 mg/kg and 5758 mg/kg, respectively in soil. The human health risk assessment results, on the other hand, showed that at least 30% (6 out of 20) of the GW samples and 60% (3 out 8) of the SW samples had HI > 1 for adults, children and infants, indicating existence of non-carcinogenic risk. Similarly, at least 15% (3 out 20) of the GW samples and 18% (1 out of 8) of the SW samples had CR > 0.001 for adults, children and infants, suggesting a risk of developing cancer during a lifetime due to Cd exposure. Though both GW and SW are generally of good chemical quality, chronic exposure to nitrate and cadmium is a health risk in the area. The current trace metal levels are not worrisome, but soil nitrate and phosphate may need regular monitoring.

1 May 2024 in Air
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
CUConstance Chifuniro Utsale
Constance Chifuniro Utsale
CKChikumbusko Kaonga
Chikumbusko Kaonga
FTFabiano Gibson Daud Thulu
Fabiano Gibson Daud Thulu
IKIshmael Kosamu
Ishmael Kosamu
FTFred Thomson
Fred Thomson
HSHiroshi Sakugawa
Hiroshi Sakugawa
The increase in industrial activities has raised concerns regarding air quality in urban areas within Malawi. To assess the source apportionment of air quality parameters (AQPs) and noise levels, concentrations of AQPs (CO, TSP, PM 2.5, PM10) and noise levels were monitored at 15 sites in Makata, Limbe, Maselema, Chirimba, and Maone during dry and wet seasons, respectively. Active mobile multi-gas monitors and a Dylos DC1100 PRO Laser Particle Counter (2018 model) were used to monitor AQPs, while Integrated Sound Level Meters were used to measure noise levels. Monitoring and analysis were guided by the World Health Organization (WHO) and Malawi Standards (MS). A Positive Matrix Factorization (PMF) model was used to determine the source apportionment of AQPs, and matrix trajectories analysed air mass movement. In the wet season, the average concentration values of CO, TSP, PM10, and PM2.5 were 0.49 ± 0.65 mg/m3, 85.03 ± 62.18 µg/m3, 14.65 ± 8.13 µg/m3, and 11.52 ± 7.19 µg/m3, respectively. Dry season average concentration values increased to 1.31 ± 0.81 mg/m3, 99.86± 30.06 µg/m3, 24.35 ± 9.53 µg/m3, and 18.28 ± 7.14 µg/m3. Noise levels remained below public MS and WHO standards (85 dB). Positive correlations between AQPs and noise levels were observed, strengthening from weak in the dry season to moderately strong in the wet season. PMF analysis identified key factors influencing AQP accumulation, emphasizing the need for periodic sampling to monitor seasonal pollution trends, considering potential impacts on public health and environmental sustainability. Further studies should look at factors affecting the dynamics of PMF in Blantyre City.