Neutralizing antibody is an important indicator of vaccine efficacy, of which IgG is the main component. IgG can be divided into four subclasses. Up to now, studies analysing the humoral response to SARS‐CoV‐2 vaccination have mostly focused on measuring total IgG, and the contribution of specific IgG subclasses remains elusive. The aim of this study is to investigate the kinetics of neutralizing antibodies and IgG subclasses, and to explore their relationships in people vaccinated with inactivated COVID‐19 vaccine. We conducted a prospective cohort study in 174 healthy adults aged 18–59 years old who were administrated 2 doses of CoronaVac 14 days apart and a booster dose 1 year after the primary immunization, and followed up for 15 months. Blood samples were collected at various time points after primary and booster immunization. We used live SARS‐CoV‐2 virus neutralizing assay to determine neutralizing ability against the wild‐type strain and 4 variants (Beta, Gamma, Delta and Omicron) and ELISA to quantify SARS‐CoV‐2 RBD‐specific IgG subclasses. The results showed that the 2‐dose primary immunization only achieved low neutralizing ability, while a booster shot can significantly enhance neutralizing ability against the wild‐type strain, Beta, Gamma, Delta and Omicron variants. IgG1 and IgG3 were the most abundant serum antibodies, and IgG2 and IgG4 were hardly detected at any time. The ratio of IgG1/IgG3 was positively associated with the neutralization ability. The underlying mechanism requires further exploration.

Purpose: To investigate the baseline levels of serotype-specific IgG antibodies to Streptococcus pneumoniae (S. pneumoniae) and assess their impact on the assessment of vaccine immunogenicity. Methods: We used a subset of serum samples from a randomized controlled trial. The blood of 584 healthy participants was collected on day 0 before and day 28 after the 23-valent pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine (PPSV23) vaccination. Serotype-specific IgG against PPSV23-covered serotypes were measured by the World Health Organization (WHO) reference enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Vaccine immunogenicity was compared using conversion rates (proportion of participants with IgG levels following immunization that are 2-fold greater than the baseline) and geometric mean fold rises (GMFRs) between the two groups, which were grouped according to pre-vaccination (baseline) IgG antibody levels. Results: Our data showed that over half of individuals have baseline IgG levels for 15 out of 23 serotypes above 1.3 µg/mL, and geometric mean concentrations (GMCs) were generally higher in the elderly group and the female group; significant differences were found in 15 serotypes for vaccine immunogenicity based on the seroconversion rate or GMFRs between individuals with baseline IgG ≥ 1.3 µg/mL and individuals with baseline IgG < 1.3 µg/mL. The seroconversion rate decreased with the increase of baseline IgG levels according to a linear regression model. Conclusions: The assessment of vaccine immunogenicity could be impacted by the fact that many adults had high baseline antibody levels. This study is registered in the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry, number NCT05298800.

Background: Concomitant administration of COVID-19, influenza, and pneumococcal vaccines could reduce the burden on healthcare systems. However, the immunogenicity and safety of various combinations of a third booster dose of SARS-CoV-2 inactivated vaccine (CoronaVac), inactivated quadrivalent influenza vaccine (IIV4), and 23-valent pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine (PPV23), particularly in different age groups, is still unknown.Methods: A phase 4, randomized, open-label, controlled trial was conducted in Beijing, China. 636 healthy adults were divided into two age groups (18-59 and ≥60 years) and randomized equally into three groups: CoronaVac and IIV4 followed by PPV23; CoronaVac and PPV23 followed by IIV4; or CoronaVac followed by IIV4 and PPV23, with a 28-day interval between vaccinations. Immunogenicity was evaluated by measuring antibody titers, and safety was monitored. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05298800.Results: Co-administration of a third dose of CoronaVac, IIV4, and PPV23 in any combination was safe. Among adults aged 18-59, co-administration with PPV23 maintained non-inferiority of antibody levels for CoronaVac and IIV4, despite a slight reduction in antibody responses. This reduction was not observed in participants ≥60 years. Furthermore, co-administration of IIV4 and PPV23 affected seroconversion rates for both vaccines.Conclusions: Co-administration of the third dose of SARS-CoV-2 inactivated vaccine with the influenza vaccine, followed by PPV23, may be optimal for adults aged 18-59. In adults ≥60, all vaccine combinations were immunogenic, suggesting a flexible vaccination approach. Since antibody measurements were taken 28 days post-vaccination, ongoing surveillance is essential to assess the longevity of the immune responses.

The constant emergence of variants of concern (VOCs) challenges the effectiveness of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) vaccines over time. This is most concerning in clinically vulnerable groups, such as older adults. This study aimed to determine whether the novel adjuvant MF59-like adjuvant can improve cross-immunity against VOCs in aged animals. We compared the humoral and cellular immune responses of Alum and MF59-like adjuvant-formulated inactivated coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccines against prototype and SARS-CoV-2 variants in 18-month-old mice. Our results showed that two doses of the MF59-like adjuvant inactivated vaccines induced more robust binding and pseudo-neutralizing antibodies (Nabs) against the SARS-CoV-2 prototype and VOCs compared to the Alum-adjuvant and reduced Omicron variant escapes from Nabs in aged mice. The humoral immune responses of inactivated vaccines were much lower against VOCs than the prototype with or without adjuvants; however, T cell responses against VOCs were not affected. In addition, Alum and MF59-like adjuvanted vaccines induced Th1-biased immune responses with increased interferon-gamma and interleukin (IL)-2 secreting cells, and hardly detectable IL-4 and IL-5. Furthermore, the MF59-like adjuvant vaccine produced 1.9–2.0 times higher cross-reactive T cell responses against the SARS-CoV-2 prototype and VOCs than the Alum adjuvant. Therefore, our data have important implications for vaccine adjuvant strategies against SARS-CoV-2 VOCs in older adults.

Background: Inactivated COVID-19 vaccines exhibit more rapid declines in antibody levels than other vaccine platforms, likely owing to transient antigen exposure and limited germinal center persistence. Moreover, although homologous boosting effectively restores humoral immunity, concerns persist regarding potential T cell exhaustion with repeated antigen exposure. We evaluated the effectiveness of delayed homologous CoronaVac booster immunization in reactivating immune memory.Methods: A prospective longitudinal cohort study was conducted with 83 healthy adults who received two CoronaVac vaccine doses (14-day interval) and a homologous booster shot after 12 months. Peripheral blood samples were collected 0, 3, 7, 10, and 14 days after booster vaccination. Neutralizing antibodies were analysed using live-virus microneutralization assays. Anti-receptor-binding domain immunoglobulin subclasses (IgG1, IgG2, IgG3, IgG4) were detected using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Cytokine secretion (interferon [IFN]-γ/interleukin [IL]-2/IL-4/IL-5) was assessed using enzyme-linked immunospot assay. T cell polarization and exhaustion markers (T-bet/GATA3 and CD69/CTLA-4/PD-1) were evaluated using flow cytometry.Results: The geometric mean titer of neutralizing antibodies reached 254.5 on day 14. The initial immune response was dominated by IgG3, which subsequently shifted to IgG1. A significant Th1-type cellular immune response was characterized by increased IFN-γ and IL-2 secretion, and upregulated T-bet expression. Transient CD69+ T cell activation occurred between days 3 and 10 without sustained PD-1 and CTLA-4 elevation.Conclusions: Delayed homologous CoronaVac booster immunization effectively reactivates immune memory, facilitated by Th1 polarization and transient T cell activation, which do not result in T cell exhaustion. These findings suggest the potential application of long-interval immunization strategies against COVID-19.

The COVID‐19 pandemic highlights the need for mucosal vaccines inducing respiratory secretory IgA (sIgA), as traditional intramuscular vaccines primarily elicit systemic IgG with limited mucosal protection. This study systematically compared mucosal immune responses induced by two authorized COVID‐19 mucosal vaccines: an orally aerosolized adenovirus vector‐based vaccine (Ad5‐nCoV) and an intranasal live‐attenuated influenza virus vector‐based vaccine (dNS1‐RBD). We longitudinally assessed IgA, IgA1, and IgA2 antibody titers against SARS‐CoV‐2 RBD/Spike protein, alongside cytokine profiles, in nasal secretions and sputum from 40 participants at 7, 14, 28 days, and 3/6 months post‐immunization. The orally aerosolized vaccine exhibited superior mucosal immunogenicity, with peak IgA positive conversion rate of 50% (nasal) and 65% (sputum) vs. 30% (nasal) and 40% (sputum) for the intranasal vaccine. Notably, the orally aerosolized vaccine induced sustained IgA2 dominance (> 50%) in sputum at 6 months, whereas the intranasal vaccine showed transient IgA1 predominance followed by decline. Despite these differences, both vaccines elicited modest overall mucosal responses, with only IL‐6 showing significant intergroup variation ( p < 0.01). This is a study to demonstrate compartmentalized IgA subclass dynamics between upper (nasal) and lower (sputum) respiratory tracts following mucosal vaccination. Our findings highlight the need for optimized mucosal vaccine formulations to enhance respiratory immunity, providing critical insights for developing next‐generation COVID‐19 vaccines targeting the complex mucosal immune microenvironment.