Juan Jose Lopez-Moya

Dr. Juan Jose Lopez-Moya

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

35Years (1992-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 March 2017 in Journal of General Virology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
SWStephen J. Wylie
Stephen J. Wylie
MAMike Adams
Mike Adams
CCCelia Chalam
Celia Chalam
JKJan Kreuze
Jan Kreuze
JLJuan Jose Lopez-Moya
Juan Jose Lopez-Moya
ICICTV Report Consortium
ICTV Report Consortium
The Potyviridae is the largest family of RNA plant viruses, members of which have single-stranded, positive-sense RNA genomes and flexuous filamentous particles 680–900 nm long and 11–20 nm wide. There are eight genera, distinguished by the host range, genomic features and phylogeny of the member viruses. Genomes range from 8.2 to 11.3 kb, with an average size of 9.7 kb. Most genomes are monopartite but those of members of the genus Bymovirus are bipartite. Some members cause serious disease epidemics in cultivated plants. This is a summary of the International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses (ICTV) Report on the taxonomy of the Potyviridae, which is available at www.ictv.global/report/potyviridae.

25 May 2006 in The EMBO Journal
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
LLLóránt Lakatos
Lóránt Lakatos
TCTibor Csorba
Tibor Csorba
VPVitantonio Pantaleo
Vitantonio Pantaleo
ECElisabeth J Chapman
Elisabeth J Chapman
JCJames C Carrington
James C Carrington
JBJózsef Burgyán
József Burgyán
EMBO Press is an editorially independent publishing platform for the development of EMBO scientific publications.

4 August 2013 in Annual Review of Phytopathology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
CBClaude Bragard
Claude Bragard
PCP. Caciagli
P. Caciagli
OLO. Lemaire
O. Lemaire
JLJuan Jose Lopez-Moya
Juan Jose Lopez-Moya
SMS. MacFarlane
S. MacFarlane
LTL. Torrance
L. Torrance
Most plant viruses rely on vector organisms for their plant-to-plant spread. Although there are many different natural vectors, few plant virus–vector systems have been well studied. This review describes our current understanding of virus transmission by aphids, thrips, whiteflies, leafhoppers, planthoppers, treehoppers, mites, nematodes, and zoosporic endoparasites. Strategies for control of vectors by host resistance, chemicals, and integrated pest management are reviewed. Many gaps in the knowledge of the transmission mechanisms and a lack of available host resistance to vectors are evident. Advances in genome sequencing and molecular technologies will help to address these problems and will allow innovative control methods through interference with vector transmission. Improved knowledge of factors affecting pest and disease spread in different ecosystems for predictive modeling is also needed. Innovative control measures are urgently required because of the increased risks from vector-borne infections that arise from environmental change.

1 March 2007 in Journal of General Virology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
AVAdrian Valli
Adrian Valli
JLJuan Jose Lopez-Moya
Juan Jose Lopez-Moya
JGJuan Antonio Garcia
Juan Antonio Garcia
Genome structure and sequence are notably conserved between members of the familyPotyviridae. However, some genomic regions of these viruses, such as that encoding the P1 protein, show strikingly high variability. In this study, some partially conserved motifs were identified upstream of the quite well-conserved protease domain located near the P1 C terminus. The irregular distribution of these motifs suggests that the potyviral P1 proteins have undergone complex evolutionary diversification. Evidence was found of recombination events in the P1 N-terminal region, similar to those reported in potyviruses of the bean common mosaic virus subgroup, but also affecting other potyviruses. Moreover, intergeneric recombination events affecting potyviruses and ipomoviruses were also observed. Evidence that these recombination events could be linked to host adaptation is provided. Specific sequence features and differences in net charge help to classify the P1 proteins of members of the familyPotyviridaeinto two groups: those from potyviruses and rymoviruses and those from tritimoviruses. The ipomovirusCucumber vein yellowing virushas two P1 copies arranged in tandem, the most N-terminal one being of the potyvirus type and the other being of the tritimovirus type. These findings suggest that both recombination and gene duplication have contributed to P1 evolution and helped to facilitate successful adaptation of members of the familyPotyviridaeto a wide range of host species.

26 May 2017 in Molecular Plant Pathology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
AVAdrian Valli
Adrian Valli
AGAraiz Gallo
Araiz Gallo
BRBernardo Rodamilans
Bernardo Rodamilans
JLJuan Jose Lopez-Moya
Juan Jose Lopez-Moya
JGJuan Antonio Garcia
Juan Antonio Garcia
Summary: RNA viruses have very compact genomes and so provide a unique opportunity to study how evolution works to optimize the use of very limited genomic information. A widespread viral strategy to solve this issue concerning the coding space relies on the expression of proteins with multiple functions. Members of the family Potyviridae , the most abundant group of RNA viruses in plants, offer several attractive examples of viral factors which play roles in diverse infection‐related pathways. The Helper Component Proteinase (HCPro) is an essential and well‐characterized multitasking protein for which at least three independent functions have been described: (i) viral plant‐to‐plant transmission; (ii) polyprotein maturation; and (iii) RNA silencing suppression. Moreover, multitudes of host factors have been found to interact with HCPro. Intriguingly, most of these partners have not been ascribed to any of the HCPro roles during the infectious cycle, supporting the idea that this protein might play even more roles than those already established. In this comprehensive review, we attempt to summarize our current knowledge about HCPro and its already attributed and putative novel roles, and to discuss the similarities and differences regarding this factor in members of this important viral family.

1 January 2020 in Phytopathology®
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
AMAna Beatriz Moreno
Ana Beatriz Moreno
JLJuan Jose Lopez-Moya
Juan Jose Lopez-Moya
The pathological importance of mixed viral infections in plants might be underestimated except for a few well-characterized synergistic combinations in certain crops. Considering that the host ranges of many viruses often overlap and that most plant species can be infected by several unrelated viruses, it is not surprising to find more than one virus simultaneously in the same plant. Furthermore, dispersal of the majority of plant viruses relies on efficient transmission mechanisms mediated by vector organisms, mainly but not exclusively insects, which can contribute to the occurrence of multiple infections in the same plant. Recent work using different experimental approaches has shown that mixed viral infections can be remarkably frequent, up to the point that they could be considered the rule more than the exception. The purpose of this review is to describe the impact of multiple infections not only on the participating viruses themselves but also on their vectors and on the common host. From this standpoint, mixed infections arise as complex events that involve several cross-interacting players, and they consequently require a more general perspective than the analysis of single-virus/single-host approaches for a full understanding of their relevance.