Hermann Frieboes

Dr. Hermann Frieboes

Department of Bioengineering and James Graham Brown Cancer Center, University of Louisville, Lutz Hall 419, Louisville, KY 40292, USA

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

16Years (2011-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 December 2017 in International Journal of Medical Informatics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
CLChip M. Lynch
Chip M. Lynch
BABehnaz Abdollahi
Behnaz Abdollahi
JFJoshua D. Fuqua
Joshua D. Fuqua
ACAlexandra R. de Carlo
Alexandra R. de Carlo
JBJames A. Bartholomai
James A. Bartholomai
Hermann FrieboesHermann Frieboes
Hermann Frieboes

1 May 2019 in Journal of Theoretical Biology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
GMGrace E. Mahlbacher
Grace E. Mahlbacher
KRKara C. Reihmer
Kara C. Reihmer
Hermann FrieboesHermann Frieboes
Hermann Frieboes

30 January 2018 in Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
GMGrace Mahlbacher
Grace Mahlbacher
LCLouis T. Curtis
Louis T. Curtis
JLJohn Lowengrub
John Lowengrub
Hermann FrieboesHermann Frieboes
Hermann Frieboes
Background Immuno-oncotherapy has emerged as a promising means to target cancer. In particular, therapeutic manipulation of tumor-associated macrophages holds promise due to their various and sometimes opposing roles in tumor progression. It is established that M1-type macrophages suppress tumor progression while M2-types support it. Recently, Tie2-expressing macrophages (TEM) have been identified as a distinct sub-population influencing tumor angiogenesis and vascular remodeling as well as monocyte differentiation. Methods This study develops a modeling framework to evaluate macrophage interactions with the tumor microenvironment, enabling assessment of how these interactions may affect tumor progression. M1, M2, and Tie2 expressing variants are integrated into a model of tumor growth representing a metastatic lesion in a highly vascularized organ, such as the liver. Behaviors simulated include M1 release of nitric oxide (NO), M2 release of growth-promoting factors, and TEM facilitation of angiogenesis via Angiopoietin-2 and promotion of monocyte differentiation into M2 via IL-10. Results The results show that M2 presence leads to larger tumor growth regardless of TEM effects, implying that immunotherapeutic strategies that lead to TEM ablation may fail to restrain growth when the M2 represents a sizeable population. As TEM pro-tumor effects are less pronounced and on a longer time scale than M1-driven tumor inhibition, a more nuanced approach to influence monocyte differentiation taking into account the tumor state (e.g., under chemotherapy) may be desirable. Conclusions The results highlight the dynamic interaction of macrophages within a growing tumor, and, further, establish the initial feasibility of a mathematical framework that could longer term help to optimize cancer immunotherapy.

1 May 2015 in European Journal of Pharmaceutics and Biopharmaceutics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
CEChristopher G. England
Christopher G. England
MMM. Clarke Miller
M. Clarke Miller
AKAshani Kuttan
Ashani Kuttan
JTJohn O. Trent
John O. Trent
Hermann FrieboesHermann Frieboes
Hermann Frieboes

28 February 2013 in PLOS ONE
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Hermann FrieboesHermann Frieboes
Hermann Frieboes
MWMin Wu
Min Wu
JLJohn Lowengrub
John Lowengrub
Paolo DecuzziPaolo Decuzzi
Paolo Decuzzi
VCVittorio Cristini
Vittorio Cristini
Vascular targeting of malignant tissues with systemically injected nanoparticles (NPs) holds promise in molecular imaging and anti-angiogenic therapies. Here, a computational model is presented to predict the development of tumor neovasculature over time and the specific, vascular accumulation of blood-borne NPs. A multidimensional tumor-growth model is integrated with a mesoscale formulation for the NP adhesion to blood vessel walls. The fraction of injected NPs depositing within the diseased vasculature and their spatial distribution is computed as a function of tumor stage, from 0 to day 24 post-tumor inception. As the malignant mass grows in size, average blood flow and shear rates increase within the tumor neovasculature, reaching values comparable with those measured in healthy, pre-existing vessels already at 10 days. The NP vascular affinity, interpreted as the likelihood for a blood-borne NP to firmly adhere to the vessel walls, is a fundamental parameter in this analysis and depends on NP size and ligand density, and vascular receptor expression. For high vascular affinities, NPs tend to accumulate mostly at the inlet tumor vessels leaving the inner and outer vasculature depleted of NPs. For low vascular affinities, NPs distribute quite uniformly intra-tumorally but exhibit low accumulation doses. It is shown that an optimal vascular affinity can be identified providing the proper balance between accumulation dose and uniform spatial distribution of the NPs. This balance depends on the stage of tumor development (vascularity and endothelial receptor expression) and the NP properties (size, ligand density and ligand-receptor molecular affinity). Also, it is demonstrated that for insufficiently developed vascular networks, NPs are transported preferentially through the healthy, pre-existing vessels, thus bypassing the tumor mass. The computational tool described here can effectively select an optimal NP formulation presenting high accumulation doses and uniform spatial intra-tumor distributions as a function of the development stage of the malignancy.

1 March 2012 in AIP Advances
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
AVAnne L. van de Ven
Anne L. van de Ven
MWMin Wu
Min Wu
JLJohn Lowengrub
John Lowengrub
SMSteven R. McDougall
Steven R. McDougall
MCMark Chaplain
Mark Chaplain
Hermann FrieboesHermann Frieboes
Hermann Frieboes
Inefficient vascularization hinders the optimal transport of cell nutrients, oxygen, and drugs to cancer cells in solid tumors. Gradients of these substances maintain a heterogeneous cell-scale microenvironment through which drugs and their carriers must travel, significantly limiting optimal drug exposure. In this study, we integrate intravital microscopy with a mathematical model of cancer to evaluate the behavior of nanoparticle-based drug delivery systems designed to circumvent biophysical barriers. We simulate the effect of doxorubicin delivered via porous 1000 x 400 nm plateloid silicon particles to a solid tumor characterized by a realistic vasculature, and vary the parameters to determine how much drug per particle and how many particles need to be released within the vasculature in order to achieve remission of the tumor. We envision that this work will contribute to the development of quantitative measures of nanoparticle design and drug loading in order to optimize cancer treatment via nanotherapeutics.