Globally, cervical cancers continue to be one of the leading causes of cancer-related deaths. The primary treatment of patients with early-stage disease includes surgery or radiation therapy with or without chemotherapy. The main challenge in treating these patients is to maintain a curative approach and limit treatment-related morbidity. Traditionally, inoperable patients are treated with radiation therapy solely and operable patients undergo upfront surgery followed by adjuvant (chemo) radiotherapy in cases with poor histopathological prognostic features. Patients with locally advanced cervical cancers are treated with concurrent chemoradiotherapy followed by an image-guided brachytherapy boost. In these patients, the main pattern of failure is distant relapse, encouraging intensification of systemic treatments to improve disease control. Ongoing trials are evaluating immunotherapy in locally advanced tumours following its encouraging efficacy reported in the recurrent and metastatic settings. In this article, clinical evidence of neoadjuvant and adjuvant treatments in cervical cancer patients is reviewed, with a focus on potential strategies to improve patients’ outcome and minimize treatment-related morbidity.

Purpose: Radiotherapy is, with surgery, one of the main therapeutic treatment strategies for meningiomas. No prospective study has defined a consensus for the delineation of target volumes for meningioma radiotherapy. Therefore, target volume definition is mainly based on information from retrospective studies that include heterogeneous patient populations. The aim is to describe delineation guidelines for meningioma radiotherapy as an adjuvant or definitive treatment with intensity-modulated radiation therapy and stereotactic radiation therapy techniques. This guideline is based on a consensus endorsed by a multidisciplinary group of brain tumor experts, members of the Association of French-speaking Neuro-oncologists (ANOCEF). Materials and methods: A 3-step procedure was used. First, the steering group carried out a comprehensive review to identify divergent issues on meningiomas target volume delineation. Second, an 84-item web-questionnaire has been developed to precisely define meningioma target volume delineation in the most common clinical situations. Third, experts members of the ANOCEF were requested to answer. The first two rounds were completed online. A third round was carried out by videoconference to allow experts to debate and discuss the remaining uncertain questions. All questions remained in a consensus. Results: Limits of the target volume were defined using visible landmarks on computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging, considering the pathways of tumor extension. The purpose was to develop clear and precise recommendations on meningiomas target volumes. Conclusion: New recommendations for meningiomas delineation based on simple anatomic boundaries are proposed by the ANOCEF. Improvement in uniformity in target volume definition is expected.

Integrin α5β1 was suggested to be involved in glioblastoma (GBM) aggressiveness and treatment resistance through preclinical studies and genomic analysis in patients. However, further protein expression data are still required to confirm this hypothesis. In the present study, we investigated by immunofluorescence the expression of integrin α5 and its prognostic impact in a glioblastoma series of patients scheduled to undergo the Stupp protocol as first-line treatment for GBM. The integrin α5 protein expression level was estimated in each tumor by the mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) and allowed us to identify two subpopulations showing either a high or low expression level. The distribution of patients in both subpopulations was not significantly different according to age, gender, recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) prognostic score, molecular markers or surgical and medical treatment. A high integrin α5 protein expression level was associated with a high risk of recurrence (HR = 1.696, 95% CI 1.031–2.792, p = 0.0377) and reduced overall survival (OS), even more significant in patients who completed the Stupp protocol (median OS: 15.6 vs. 22.8 months; HR = 2.324; 95% CI 1.168–4.621, p = 0.0162). In multivariate analysis, a high integrin α5 protein expression level was confirmed as an independent prognostic factor in the subpopulation of patients who completed the temozolomide-based first-line treatment for predicting OS over age, extent of surgery, RPA score and O-6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) promoter methylation (p = 0.029). In summary, for the first time, our study validates that a high integrin α5 protein expression level is associated with poor prognosis in GBM and confirms its potential as a therapeutic target implicated in the Stupp protocol resistance.

Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) gene alterations and amplification are frequently reported in cases of glioblastoma (GBM). However, EGFR-activating mutations that confer proven sensitivity to tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in lung cancer have not yet been reported in GBM. Using next-generation sequencing, array comparative genomic hybridization and droplet digital PCR, we identified the p.L861Q EGFR mutation in a case of GBM for the first time. The mutation was associated with gene amplification. L861Q may be a clinically valuable mutation because it is known to sensitize non-small-cell lung cancers to treatment with the second-generation EGFR TKI afatinib in particular. Furthermore, we used slice culture of the patient’s GBM explant to evaluate the tumour’s sensitivity to various EGFR-targeting drugs. Our results suggested that the tumour was not intrinsically sensitive to these drugs. Our results highlight (i) the value of comprehensive genomic analyses for identifying patient-specific, targetable alterations, and (ii) the need to combine genomic analyses with functional assays, such as tumour-derived slice cultures.

Purpose: Management of head and neck cancers of unknown primary (HNCUP) combines neck dissection (ND) and radiotherapy, with or without chemotherapy. The prognostic value of ND has hardly been studied in HNCUP. Methods: A retrospective multicentric study assessed the impact of ND extent (adenectomy, selective ND, radical/radical-modified ND) on nodal relapse, progression-free survival (PFS) or survival, taking into account nodal stage. Results: 53 patients (16.5%) had no ND, 33 (10.2%) had lymphadenectomy, 116 (36.0%) underwent selective ND and 120 underwent radical/radical-modified ND (37.3%), 15 of which received radical ND (4.7%). With a 34-month median follow-up, the 3-year incidence of nodal relapse was 12.5% and progression-free survival (PFS) 69.1%. In multivariate analysis after adjusting for nodal stage, the risk of nodal relapse or progression was reduced with lymphadenectomy, selective or radical/modified ND, but survival rates were similar. Patients undergoing lymphadenectomy or ND had a better PFS and lowered nodal relapse incidence in the N1 + N2a group, but the improvement was not significant for the N2b or N2 + N3c patients. Severe toxicity rates exceeded 40% with radical ND. Conclusion: In HNCUP, ND improves PFS, regardless of nodal stage. The magnitude of the benefit of ND does not appear to depend on ND extent and decreases with a more advanced nodal stage.

Background/Objectives: Determining whether 3,4-dihydroxy-6-[¹⁸F]fluoro-L-phenylalanine positron emission tomography/computed tomography ([¹⁸F]F-DOPA PET/CT) data indicate brain metastasis progression (MP) or brain radionecrosis (RN) is challenging. The aim of this study was to present a method usable in the clinical setting without dedicated software that relies on less than five minutes of SiPM PET/CT data collected immediately after [¹⁸F]F-DOPA injection. Methods: We prospectively enrolled 15 patients with 19 lesions. Each acquisition was conducted in list mode (LM) for 25 min using a four-ring SiPM PET/CT system. We reconstructed three volumes from the LM file: acquisition duration of 120 s (V120), 270 s (V270), and 10 min for the standard clinical volume (Vclin). We measured each lesion’s maximum voxel activity (LS_max) and the corresponding mean activity with its standard deviation (CL_mean, CL_sd). We then calculated the LS_max/CL_mean ratio and the coefficient of variation (COV), defined as 100 × (CL_sd/CL_mean). Results: Lesions were classified as RN (n = 7) and MP (n = 12). For all volumes, LS_max/CL_mean differed significantly. The COV parameter exhibited significant differences in all comparisons except for V120 vs. V270. The best diagnostic performances were observed for V120 and V270, with an accuracy of 94.7%. The AUC values were 97.6% in both cases. Conclusions: A simple, static [¹⁸F]F-DOPA PET/CT acquisition, starting 1.5 min after injection and lasting less than five minutes, permitted reaching excellent diagnostic performance (100% sensitivity, 91.7% specificity, and 97.6% AUC) in discriminating between RN and MP.