George Blackburn

Dr. George Blackburn


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

28Years (1999-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
11 May 2016 in Nutrients
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
CMCamilia Martin
Camilia Martin
PLPei-Ra Ling
Pei-Ra Ling
GBGeorge Blackburn
George Blackburn
Mothers’ own milk is the best source of nutrition for nearly all infants. Beyond somatic growth, breast milk as a biologic fluid has a variety of other benefits, including modulation of postnatal intestinal function, immune ontogeny, and brain development. Although breastfeeding is highly recommended, breastfeeding may not always be possible, suitable or solely adequate. Infant formula is an industrially produced substitute for infant consumption. Infant formula attempts to mimic the nutritional composition of breast milk as closely as possible, and is based on cow’s milk or soymilk. A number of alternatives to cow’s milk-based formula also exist. In this article, we review the nutritional information of breast milk and infant formulas for better understanding of the importance of breastfeeding and the uses of infant formula from birth to 12 months of age when a substitute form of nutrition is required.

25 October 2011 in International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
IIIkuyo Imayama
Ikuyo Imayama
CACatherine M Alfano
Catherine M Alfano
AKAngela Kong
Angela Kong
KFKaren E Foster-Schubert
Karen E Foster-Schubert
CBCarolyn E Bain
Carolyn E Bain
AMAnne McTiernan
Anne McTiernan
Background: Although lifestyle interventions targeting multiple lifestyle behaviors are more effective in preventing unhealthy weight gain and chronic diseases than intervening on a single behavior, few studies have compared individual and combined effects of diet and/or exercise interventions on health-related quality of life (HRQOL). In addition, the mechanisms of how these lifestyle interventions affect HRQOL are unknown. The primary aim of this study was to examine the individual and combined effects of dietary weight loss and/or exercise interventions on HRQOL and psychosocial factors (depression, anxiety, stress, social support). The secondary aim was to investigate predictors of changes in HRQOL. Methods: This study was a randomized controlled trial. Overweight/obese postmenopausal women were randomly assigned to 12 months of dietary weight loss (n = 118), moderate-to-vigorous aerobic exercise (225 minutes/week, n = 117), combined diet and exercise (n = 117), or control (n = 87). Demographic, health and anthropometric information, aerobic fitness, HRQOL (SF-36), stress (Perceived Stress Scale), depression [Brief Symptom Inventory (BSI)-18], anxiety (BSI-18) and social support (Medical Outcome Study Social Support Survey) were assessed at baseline and 12 months. The 12-month changes in HRQOL and psychosocial factors were compared using analysis of covariance, adjusting for baseline scores. Multiple regression was used to assess predictors of changes in HRQOL. Results: Twelve-month changes in HRQOL and psychosocial factors differed by intervention group. The combined diet + exercise group improved 4 aspects of HRQOL (physical functioning, role-physical, vitality, and mental health), and stress (p ≤ 0.01 vs. controls). The diet group increased vitality score (p < 0.01 vs. control), while HRQOL did not change differently in the exercise group compared with controls. However, regardless of intervention group, weight loss predicted increased physical functioning, role-physical, vitality, and mental health, while increased aerobic fitness predicted improved physical functioning. Positive changes in depression, stress, and social support were independently associated with increased HRQOL, after adjusting for changes in weight and aerobic fitness. Conclusions: A combined diet and exercise intervention has positive effects on HRQOL and psychological health, which may be greater than that from exercise or diet alone. Improvements in weight, aerobic fitness and psychosocial factors may mediate intervention effects on HRQOL. Trial Registration: Clinical Trials, ClinicalTrials.gov register, NCT00470119

16 June 2011 in Obesity Reviews
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
RJR. J. Joseph
R. J. Joseph
MAM. Alonso‐Alonso
M. Alonso‐Alonso
DBD. S. Bond
D. S. Bond
APA. Pascual‐Leone
A. Pascual‐Leone
GBGeorge Blackburn
George Blackburn

1 September 2007 in The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
GBGeorge Blackburn
George Blackburn
KWKatherine A Wang
Katherine A Wang
Given that existing epidemiologic data on the correlation between dietary fat and breast cancer have been mixed, the Women's Intervention Nutrition Study was launched in 1987. This randomized clinical trial of 2437 women between the ages of 48 and 79 y with early-stage breast cancer tested the hypothesis that dietary fat reduction would increase the relapse-free survival rate. The study determined that low-fat dietary interventions can influence body weight and decrease breast cancer recurrence. Results showing a differential effect of diet on hormone-receptor-positive and -negative disease suggest that metabolic mechanisms involving insulin and insulin-like growth factor-1 may be involved in tumorigenesis. The results of the Women's Intervention Nutrition Study may therefore contribute to knowledge of the role of insulin resistance in cancer risk.

1 May 2009 in Obesity
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
GBGeorge Blackburn
George Blackburn
MHMatthew M. Hutter
Matthew M. Hutter
AHAlan M. Harvey
Alan M. Harvey
CACaroline M. Apovian
Caroline M. Apovian
HBHannah R.W. Boulton
Hannah R.W. Boulton
CACatherine L. Annas
Catherine L. Annas
Rapid shifts in the demographics and techniques of weight loss surgery (WLS) have led to new issues, new data, new concerns, and new challenges. In 2004, this journal published comprehensive evidence‐based guidelines on WLS. In this issue, we've updated those guidelines to assure patient safety in this fast‐changing field. WLS involves a uniquely vulnerable population in need of specialized resources and ongoing multidisciplinary care. Timely best‐practice updates are required to identify new risks, develop strategies to address them, and optimize treatment. Findings in these reports are based on a comprehensive review of the most current literature on WLS; they directly link patient safety to methods for setting evidence‐based guidelines developed from peer‐reviewed scientific publications. Among other outcomes, these reports show that WLS reduces chronic disease risk factors, improves health, and confers a survival benefit on those who undergo it. The literature also shows that laparoscopy has displaced open surgery as the predominant approach; that government agencies and insurers only reimburse procedures performed at accredited WLS centers; that best practice care requires close collaboration between members of a multidisciplinary team; and that new and existing facilities require wide‐ranging changes to accommodate growing numbers of severely obese patients. More than 100 specialists from across the state of Massachusetts and across the many disciplines involved in WLS came together to develop these new standards. We expect them to have far‐reaching effects of the development of health care policy and the practice of WLS.

1 June 2011 in Surgical Clinics of North America
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
GBGeorge Blackburn
George Blackburn