Camilia Martin

Dr. Camilia Martin


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

22Years (2005-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
11 May 2016 in Nutrients
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
CMCamilia Martin
Camilia Martin
PLPei-Ra Ling
Pei-Ra Ling
GBGeorge Blackburn
George Blackburn
Mothers’ own milk is the best source of nutrition for nearly all infants. Beyond somatic growth, breast milk as a biologic fluid has a variety of other benefits, including modulation of postnatal intestinal function, immune ontogeny, and brain development. Although breastfeeding is highly recommended, breastfeeding may not always be possible, suitable or solely adequate. Infant formula is an industrially produced substitute for infant consumption. Infant formula attempts to mimic the nutritional composition of breast milk as closely as possible, and is based on cow’s milk or soymilk. A number of alternatives to cow’s milk-based formula also exist. In this article, we review the nutritional information of breast milk and infant formulas for better understanding of the importance of breastfeeding and the uses of infant formula from birth to 12 months of age when a substitute form of nutrition is required.

24 February 2021 in Nature
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
CRCHITONG RAO
CHITONG RAO
KCKatharine Z. Coyte
Katharine Z. Coyte
WBWayne Bainter
Wayne Bainter
RGRaif S. Geha
Raif S. Geha
CMCamilia Martin
Camilia Martin
SRSeth Rakoff-Nahoum
Seth Rakoff-Nahoum

1 November 2011 in The Journal of Pediatrics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
CMCamilia Martin
Camilia Martin
DDDeborah A. DaSilva
Deborah A. DaSilva
JCJoanne E. Cluette-Brown
Joanne E. Cluette-Brown
CDClementina DiMonda
Clementina DiMonda
AHAshley Hamill
Ashley Hamill
SFSteven D. Freedman
Steven D. Freedman

1 August 2009 in Pediatrics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
CMCamilia Martin
Camilia Martin
YBYolanda F. Brown
Yolanda F. Brown
RERichard A. Ehrenkranz
Richard A. Ehrenkranz
TOT. Michael O'Shea
T. Michael O'Shea
EAElizabeth N. Allred
Elizabeth N. Allred
TIthe Extremely Low Gestational Age Newborns Study Investigators
the Extremely Low Gestational Age Newborns Study Investigators
OBJECTIVES: The goals of this study were to describe nutritional practices in the first month of life for a large cohort of extremely low gestational age newborns and to determine the impact of these nutritional practices on growth velocity (GV) over the same period. METHODS: The sample included 1187 infants born at 23 to 27 weeks of gestation, at 14 institutions, between 2002 and 2004. Inclusion criteria included survival until day 28 and weight information for days 7 and 28. GV, expressed as grams per kilogram per day, was calculated for the interval between days 7 and 28. Nutritional practices during the first week and on days 14, 21, and 28 were compared with current nutritional guidelines in the literature. Multivariable logistic regression models estimated the contribution of limited nutrition to limited GV. RESULTS: Protein and fat delivery approximated current nutritional recommendations, whereas carbohydrate and total energy intake delivery did not. Despite this, GV of our study infants exceeded the current guideline of 15 g/kg per day. Nevertheless, we found extrauterine growth restriction (ie, weight for gestational age below the 10th centile) in 75% of the infants at 28 days, compared with only 18% at birth. A GV of 20 to 30 g/kg per day was associated with infants' maintaining or exceeding their birth weight z score, with rates in the upper range for the gestationally youngest infants. Early (day 7) nutritional practices were positively associated with GV measured between days 7 and 28. CONCLUSION: The early provision of nutrients is an important determinant of postnatal growth. Extrauterine growth restriction remains high in extremely premature infants even when they achieve a GV rate within current guidelines.

1 November 2010 in The Journal of Pediatrics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
CMCamilia Martin
Camilia Martin
ODOlaf Dammann
Olaf Dammann
EAElizabeth N. Allred
Elizabeth N. Allred
SPSonal Patel
Sonal Patel
TOT. Michael O'Shea
T. Michael O'Shea
ALAlan Leviton
Alan Leviton

19 February 2020 in Nutrients
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
David Ramiro-CortijoDavid Ramiro-Cortijo
David Ramiro-Cortijo
PSPRATIBHA SINGH
PRATIBHA SINGH
YLYan Liu
Yan Liu
EMEsli Medina-Morales
Esli Medina-Morales
William YakahWilliam Yakah
William Yakah
CMCamilia Martin
Camilia Martin
Human breast milk is the optimal source of nutrition for infant growth and development. Breast milk fats and their downstream derivatives of fatty acids and fatty acid-derived terminal mediators not only provide an energy source but also are important regulators of development, immune function, and metabolism. The composition of the lipids and fatty acids determines the nutritional and physicochemical properties of human milk fat. Essential fatty acids, including long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acids (LCPUFAs) and specialized pro-resolving mediators, are critical for growth, organogenesis, and regulation of inflammation. Combined data including in vitro, in vivo, and human cohort studies support the beneficial effects of human breast milk in intestinal development and in reducing the risk of intestinal injury. Human milk has been shown to reduce the occurrence of necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC), a common gastrointestinal disease in preterm infants. Preterm infants fed human breast milk are less likely to develop NEC compared to preterm infants receiving infant formula. Intestinal development and its physiological functions are highly adaptive to changes in nutritional status influencing the susceptibility towards intestinal injury in response to pathological challenges. In this review, we focus on lipids and fatty acids present in breast milk and their impact on neonatal gut development and the risk of disease.