Approaching environmental sustainability of agriculture: environmental burden, eco-efficiency or eco-effectiveness | Bazyli Czyżewski, Anna Matuszczak, Andreea Muntean | Agricultural Journals

The aim of this article is to indicate the rationale for the development of the bioeconomy in selected EU countries depending on their overall level of economic development. The research was based on four highly developed countries, i.e., Germany, France, Finland and Denmark, and four medium-developed countries, i.e., Poland, Hungary, Czech Republic, and Slovakia for the period 2001–2018. Renewable energy consumption, biomass and agricultural production were analysed as determinants of the bioeconomy development. The question was also answered whether differences in terms of measures determining the level of bioeconomy development between countries with different levels of economic development during the studied period are decreasing or increasing, using sigma (σ)-convergence coefficients. It is shown that the development of the bioeconomy of the studied countries is related to their level of economic development. In the middle economically developed countries, real opportunities for the development of the bioeconomy are noted, through a high share of agriculture in national income; and in highly developed countries—high spending on research and development and the growth of eco-innovation, which contributes to maintaining a development advantage between these groups of countries.

Fine particulate matter (PM_2.5) emissions are an important global issue as air pollutants lead to approximately 7 million deaths per year (World Health Organization). In an attempt to combat this global threat, countries in the European Union (EU) allocate relatively large funds for environmental policies. The main goal of this paper is to assess the long-term efficiency of the EU countries’ environmental policy in reducing the pressure of particulates pollution on the natural environment. For this purpose, multilevel panel regression models based on seminal within–between specification are used. The models are run for a panel of 25 EU countries for the years 2004–2016. In the investigations, we tried to capture the effect of the share of utilized agricultural area (UAA) in non-urban areas of the analyzed countries, as it may potentially influence policy efficiency. It was found that environmental spending in all main categories (pollution abatement, biodiversity, R&D, and environmental protection) had a significant impact on decreasing pollution pressure; however, the policy was more efficient in countries which had a lower share of UAA in their non-urban areas. The study emphasized that the impact of “pollution abatement” expenditure may be underestimated in basic panel models.

W pracy dokonano przeglądu 200 artykułów dotyczących skorygowanej środowiskowo efektywności rolnictwa, które dostępne są w bazie Scopus. Na podstawie metody PRISMA ograniczono zakres przeglądu do prac, w których efektywność oceniana jest za pomocą analizy obwiedni danych (DEA) lub...

The article presents the universal dilemmas of the agrarian question. The outset there has been historical references relating to the management of land, reaching antiquity. In turn pointed to attempts to define and solve the agrarian question, with particular emphasis on the views of agrarists. At the same time contains the parallel reference to the present, the substitution money by land, food security, income disparity issues and seek alternative sources of income. Historical dilemmas were brought to the ground today, by showing their timelessness. You can now conclude that the agrarian question is lasting, and relatively recent problem of conscious sustainability of agriculture, seen as an organic whole, which itself is not followed and will not reconcile the interests of economic, social and environmental impacts.