Aurora Nedelcu

Prof. Dr. Aurora Nedelcu

Department of Biology, University of New Brunswick, PO Box 4400 Fredericton, NB E3B 5A3, Canada
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

31Years (1996-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
24 September 2010 in Evolution
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Aurora NedelcuAurora Nedelcu
Aurora Nedelcu
WDWilliam W. Driscoll
William W. Driscoll
PDPierre M. Durand
Pierre M. Durand
MHMatthew D. Herron
Matthew D. Herron
ARArmin Rashidi
Armin Rashidi

23 May 2006 in Molecular Biology and Evolution
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Aurora NedelcuAurora Nedelcu
Aurora Nedelcu
RMRichard E. Michod
Richard E. Michod
Although the conditions favoring altruism are being increasingly understood, the evolutionary origins of the genetic basis for this behavior remain elusive. Here, we show that reproductive altruism (i.e., a sterile soma) in the multicellular green alga, Volvox carteri, evolved via the co-option of a life-history gene whose expression in the unicellular ancestor was conditioned on an environmental cue (as an adaptive strategy to enhance survival at an immediate cost to reproduction) through shifting its expression from a temporal (environmentally induced) into a spatial (developmental) context. The gene belongs to a diverged and structurally heterogeneous multigene family sharing a SAND-like domain (a DNA-binding module involved in gene transcription regulation). To our knowledge, this is the first example of a social gene specifically associated with reproductive altruism, whose origin can be traced back to a solitary ancestor. These findings complement recent proposals that the differentiation of sterile castes in social insects involved the co-option of regulatory networks that control sequential shifts between phases in the life cycle of solitary insects.

31 December 2020 in Evolutionary Applications
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ADAntoine Dujon
Antoine Dujon
AAAthena Aktipis
Athena Aktipis
Catherine Alix-PanabieresCatherine Alix-Panabieres
Catherine Alix-Panabieres
SASarah R. Amend
Sarah R. Amend
ABAmy M. Boddy
Amy M. Boddy
BUBeata Ujvari
Beata Ujvari
The application of evolutionary and ecological principles to cancer prevention and treatment, as well as recognizing cancer as a selection force in nature, has gained impetus over the last 50 years. Following the initial theoretical approaches that combined knowledge from interdisciplinary fields, it became clear that using the eco‐evolutionary framework is of key importance to understand cancer. We are now at a pivotal point where accumulating evidence starts to steer the future directions of the discipline and allows us to underpin the key challenges that remain to be addressed. Here, we aim to assess current advancements in the field and to suggest future directions for research. First, we summarize cancer research areas that, so far, have assimilated ecological and evolutionary principles into their approaches and illustrate their key importance. Then, we assembled 33 experts and identified 84 key questions, organized around nine major themes, to pave the foundations for research to come. We highlight the urgent need for broadening the portfolio of research directions to stimulate novel approaches at the interface of oncology and ecological and evolutionary sciences. We conclude that progressive and efficient cross‐disciplinary collaborations that draw on the expertise of the fields of ecology, evolution and cancer are essential in order to efficiently address current and future questions about cancer.

7 August 2004 in Proceedings Of The Royal Society B-Biological Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Aurora NedelcuAurora Nedelcu
Aurora Nedelcu
OMOana Marcu
Oana Marcu
RMRichard E. Michod
Richard E. Michod
Organisms are constantly subjected to factors that can alter the cellular redox balance and result in the formation of a series of highly reactive molecules known as reactive oxygen species (ROS). As ROS can be damaging to biological structures, cells evolved a series of mechanisms (e.g. cell–cycle arrest, programmed cell death) to respond to high levels of ROS (i.e. oxidative stress). Recently, we presented evidence that in a facultatively sexual lineage—the multicellular green alga Volvox carteri—sex is an additional response to increased levels of stress, and probably ROS and DNA damage. Here we show that, in V. carteri, (i) sex is triggered by an approximately twofold increase in the level of cellular ROS (induced either by the natural sex–inducing stress, namely heat, or by blocking the mitochondrial electron transport chain with antimycin A), and (ii) ROS are responsible for the activation of sex genes. As most types of stress result in the overproduction of ROS, we believe that our findings will prove to extend to other facultatively sexual lineages, which could be indicative of the ancestral role of sex as an adaptive response to stress and ROS–induced DNA damage.

9 October 2007 in Wilhelm Roux' Archiv für Entwicklungsmechanik der Organismen
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Aurora NedelcuAurora Nedelcu
Aurora Nedelcu
CTChristopher Tan
Christopher Tan

7 November 2003 in Proceedings Of The Royal Society B-Biological Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Aurora NedelcuAurora Nedelcu
Aurora Nedelcu
RMRichard E. Michod
Richard E. Michod
The evolution of sex is one of the long-standing unsolved problems in biology. Although in many lineages sex is an obligatory part of the life cycle and is associated with reproduction, in prokaryotes and many lower eukaryotes, sex is facultative, occurs in response to stress and often involves the formation of a stress-resistant dormant form. The proximate and ultimate causes of the connection between stress and sex in facultatively sexual lineages are unclear. Because most forms of stress result in the overproduction of cellular reactive oxygen species (ROS), we address the hypothesis that this connection involves ROS and possibly reflects the ancestral role of sex as an adaptive response to the damaging effects of stress-induced ROS (i.e. oxidative stress). Here, we report that two antioxidants inhibit sexual induction in a facultatively sexual species - the multicellular green alga, Volvox carteri. Furthermore, the nature of the sex response and the effect of an iron chelator on sexual induction are consistent with sex being a response to the DNA-damaging effects of ROS. In addition, we present preliminary data to suggest that sex, cell-cycle arrest and apoptosis are alternative responses to increased levels of oxidative stress.