For the past 100 years, polyphenol research has played a central role in brewing science. The class of phenolic substances comprises simple compounds built of 1 phenolic group as well as monomeric and oligomeric flavonoid compounds. As potential anti‐ or prooxidants, flavor precursors, flavoring agents and as interaction partners with other beer constituents, they influence important beer quality characteristics: flavor, color, colloidal, and flavor stability. The reactive potential of polyphenols is defined by their basic chemical structure, hydroxylation and substitution patterns and degree of polymerization. The quantitative and qualitative profile of phenolic substances in beer is determined by raw material choice. During the malting and brewing process, phenolic compounds undergo changes as they are extracted or enzymatically released, are subjected to heat‐induced chemical reactions or are precipitated with or adsorbed to hot and cold trub, yeast cells and stabilization agents. This review presents the current state of knowledge of the composition of phenolic compounds in beer and brewing raw materials with a special focus on their fate from raw materials throughout the malting and brewing process to the final beer. Due to high‐performance analytical techniques, new insights have been gained on the structure and function of phenolic substance groups, which have hitherto received little attention. This paper presents important information and current studies on the potential of phenolics to interact with other beer constituents and thus influence quality parameters. The structural features which determine the reactive potential of phenolic substances are discussed.
Specialty malts comprise a promising field for innovative approaches concerning their potential in terms of color, aroma, and taste influence on the composition of beer and other beverages. Nevertheless, poor reproducibility of aroma and taste is a recurrent struggle between maltsters, leaving color as a practical parameter for quality control. However, malts with similar coloration can present distinct aroma profiles, leaving open questions concerning key aroma compounds, their dynamic responses to malting process variations and to what extent they may vary in a certain color range. Key aroma volatiles have been identified in the matrix of barley malt, comprising a variety of products of non‐enzymatic browning reactions (e.g., caramelization, pyrolysis, and Maillard reactions). Here, water plays a crucial role together with the intensity of the temperature regimes. Nevertheless, the final aroma profile of a malt product is the result of a balance between aroma formation and losses. Therefore, the correlation between color and aroma is of big complexity. That being the case, the present article questions if key aroma compounds responsible for the peculiar flavors of specialties have been defined by scientific literature and whether their production dynamics is unveiled. In this manner, this work proposes an overview of the aroma compounds present in specialty malt products studied up to the current date. More specifically, the process production of specialty malts and its potential impact on the formation of aroma and taste is studied alongside the key aroma‐active compounds, their correlation to color, and trending analytical techniques for aroma and color assessment.
10 May 2018 in Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition
Despite years of research, sensory deterioration during beer aging remains a challenge to brewing chemists. Therefore, sensorial and analytical tools to investigate aging flavors are required. This review aims to summarize the available analytical methods and to highlight the problems associated with addressing the flavor-stability of beer. Carbonyls are the major contributors to the aroma of aged pale lager beer, which is especially susceptible to deterioration. They are formed via known pathways during storage, but, as recent research indicates, are mainly released from the bound-state during aging. However, most published studies are based on model systems, and thus the formation and breakdown parameters of these adducts are poorly understood. This concept has not been previously considered in previous forced-aging analysis. Only weak parallels can be drawn between forced and natural aging. This is likely due to the different activation energies of the chemical processes responsible for aging, but may also be due to heat-promoted release of bound aldehydes. Thus, precursors and their binding parameters must be investigated to make appropriate technological adjustments to forced-aging experiments. In combination with sophisticated data analysis, the investigation of volatile indicators and non-volatile precursors can lead to more reliable predictions of flavor stability.