Maik Naumann

Maik Naumann

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

12Years (2015-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 June 2018 in Journal of Energy Storage
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MNMaik Naumann
Maik Naumann
MSMichael Schimpe
Michael Schimpe
PKPeter Keil
Peter Keil
Holger HesseHolger Hesse
Holger Hesse
Andreas JossenAndreas Jossen
Andreas Jossen

12 January 2018 in Journal of the Electrochemical Society
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MSMichael Schimpe
Michael Schimpe
MKM. E. von Kuepach
M. E. von Kuepach
MNMaik Naumann
Maik Naumann
Holger HesseHolger Hesse
Holger Hesse
KSK. Smith
K. Smith
Andreas JossenAndreas Jossen
Andreas Jossen
For reliable lifetime predictions of lithium-ion batteries, models for cell degradation are required. A comprehensive semi-empirical model based on a reduced set of internal cell parameters and physically justified degradation functions for the capacity loss is developed and presented for a commercial lithium iron phosphate/graphite cell. One calendar and several cycle aging effects are modeled separately. Emphasis is placed on the varying degradation at different temperatures. Degradation mechanisms for cycle aging at high and low temperatures as well as the increased cycling degradation at high state of charge are calculated separately. For parameterization, a lifetime test study is conducted including storage and cycle tests. Additionally, the model is validated through a dynamic current profile based on real-world application in a stationary energy storage system revealing the accuracy. Tests for validation are continued for up to 114 days after the longest parametrization tests. The model error for the cell capacity loss in the application-based tests is at the end of testing below 1% of the original cell capacity and the maximum relative model error is below 21%.

1 December 2017 in Journal of Energy Storage
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
KRKatharina Rumpf
Katharina Rumpf
MNMaik Naumann
Maik Naumann
Andreas JossenAndreas Jossen
Andreas Jossen

1 March 2020 in Journal of Power Sources
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MNMaik Naumann
Maik Naumann
FSFranz B. Spingler
Franz B. Spingler
AJAndreas Jossen
Andreas Jossen

22 June 2017 in Energies
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Holger HesseHolger Hesse
Holger Hesse
RMRodrigo Martins
Rodrigo Martins
Petr MusilekPetr Musilek
Petr Musilek
MNMaik Naumann
Maik Naumann
CTCong Nam Truong
Cong Nam Truong
Andreas JossenAndreas Jossen
Andreas Jossen
Battery energy storage systems (BESS) coupled with rooftop-mounted residential photovoltaic (PV) generation, designated as PV-BESS, draw increasing attention and market penetration as more and more such systems become available. The manifold BESS deployed to date rely on a variety of different battery technologies, show a great variation of battery size, and power electronics dimensioning. However, given today’s high investment costs of BESS, a well-matched design and adequate sizing of the storage systems are prerequisites to allow profitability for the end-user. The economic viability of a PV-BESS depends also on the battery operation, storage technology, and aging of the system. In this paper, a general method for comprehensive PV-BESS techno-economic analysis and optimization is presented and applied to the state-of-art PV-BESS to determine its optimal parameters. Using a linear optimization method, a cost-optimal sizing of the battery and power electronics is derived based on solar energy availability and local demand. At the same time, the power flow optimization reveals the best storage operation patterns considering a trade-off between energy purchase, feed-in remuneration, and battery aging. Using up to date technology-specific aging information and the investment cost of battery and inverter systems, three mature battery chemistries are compared; a lead-acid (PbA) system and two lithium-ion systems, one with lithium-iron-phosphate (LFP) and another with lithium-nickel-manganese-cobalt (NMC) cathode. The results show that different storage technology and component sizing provide the best economic performances, depending on the scenario of load demand and PV generation.

1 January 2018 in Applied Energy
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MSMichael Schimpe
Michael Schimpe
MNMaik Naumann
Maik Naumann
NTNam Truong
Nam Truong
Holger HesseHolger Hesse
Holger Hesse
SSShriram Santhanagopalan
Shriram Santhanagopalan
Andreas JossenAndreas Jossen
Andreas Jossen