Ryan Peterson

Dr. Ryan Peterson

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

11Years (2016-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
15 June 2019 in Journal of Applied Statistics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
RPRyan Peterson
Ryan Peterson
Joseph CavanaughJoseph Cavanaugh
Joseph Cavanaugh
Normalization transformations have recently experienced a resurgence in popularity in the era of machine learning, particularly in data preprocessing. However, the classical methods that can be adapted to cross-validation are not always effective. We introduce Ordered Quantile (ORQ) normalization, a one-to-one transformation that is designed to consistently and effectively transform a vector of arbitrary distribution into a vector that follows a normal (Gaussian) distribution. In the absence of ties, ORQ normalization is guaranteed to produce normally distributed transformed data. Once trained, an ORQ transformation can be readily and effectively applied to new data. We compare the effectiveness of the ORQ technique with other popular normalization methods in a simulation study where the true data generating distributions are known. We find that ORQ normalization is the only method that works consistently and effectively, regardless of the underlying distribution. We also explore the use of repeated cross-validation to identify the best normalizing transformation when the true underlying distribution is unknown. We apply our technique and other normalization methods via the bestNormalize R package on a car pricing data set. We built bestNormalize to evaluate the normalization efficacy of many candidate transformations; the package is freely available via the Comprehensive R Archive Network.

16 May 2017 in Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
CAChris A. Anthony
Chris A. Anthony
RPRyan Peterson
Ryan Peterson
LPLinnea A. Polgreen
Linnea A. Polgreen
DSDaniel Sewell
Daniel Sewell
PPPhilip M Polgreen
Philip M Polgreen
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether the seasonality of surgical site infections (SSIs) can be explained by changes in temperature.DESIGN: Retrospective cohort analysis.SETTING: The National Inpatient Sample database.PATIENTS: All hospital discharges with a primary diagnosis of SSI from 1998 to 2011 were considered cases. Discharges with a primary or secondary diagnoses of specific surgeries commonly associated with SSIs from the previous and current month served as our “at risk” cohort.METHODS: We modeled the national monthly count of SSI cases both nationally and stratified by region, sex, age, and type of institution. We used data from the National Climatic Data Center to estimate the monthly average temperatures for all hospital locations. We modeled the odds of having a primary diagnosis of SSI as a function of demographics, payer, location, patient severity, admission month, year, and the average temperature in the month of admission.RESULTS: SSI incidence is highly seasonal, with the highest SSI incidence in August and the lowest in January. During the study period, there were 26.5% more cases in August than in January (95% CI, 23.3–29.7). Controlling for demographic and hospital-level characteristics, the odds of a primary SSI admission increased by roughly 2.1% per 2.8°C (5°F) increase in the average monthly temperature. Specifically, the highest temperature group, >32.2°C (>90°F), was associated with an increase in the odds of an SSI admission of 28.9% (95% CI, 20.2–38.3) compared to temperatures <4.4°C (<40°F).CONCLUSIONS: At population level, SSI risk is highly seasonal and is associated with warmer weather.Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol2017;38:809–816

25 January 2022 in JCI Insight
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ARAlicia Nicole Rizzo
Alicia Nicole Rizzo
SHSarah M. Haeger
Sarah M. Haeger
KOKaori Oshima
Kaori Oshima
YYYimu Yang
Yimu Yang
AWAlison M. Wallbank
Alison M. Wallbank
ESEric P. Schmidt
Eric P. Schmidt
Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is a common cause of respiratory failure yet has few pharmacologic therapies, reflecting the mechanistic heterogeneity of lung injury. We hypothesized that damage to the alveolar epithelial glycocalyx, a layer of glycosaminoglycans interposed between the epithelium and surfactant, contributes to lung injury in patients with ARDS. Using mass spectrometry of airspace fluid noninvasively collected from mechanically ventilated patients, we found that airspace glycosaminoglycan shedding (an index of glycocalyx degradation) occurred predominantly in patients with direct lung injury and was associated with duration of mechanical ventilation. Male patients had increased shedding, which correlated with airspace concentrations of matrix metalloproteinases. Selective epithelial glycocalyx degradation in mice was sufficient to induce surfactant dysfunction, a key characteristic of ARDS, leading to microatelectasis and decreased lung compliance. Rapid colorimetric quantification of airspace glycosaminoglycans was feasible and could provide point-of-care prognostic information to clinicians and/or be used for predictive enrichment in clinical trials.

23 July 2018 in Clinical Trials
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JLJennifer G. Le-Rademacher
Jennifer G. Le-Rademacher
RPRyan Peterson
Ryan Peterson
TTTerry M Therneau
Terry M Therneau
BSBen L Sanford
Ben L Sanford
RSRichard M Stone
Richard M Stone
SMSumithra J Mandrekar
Sumithra J Mandrekar
Background/aims: The goal of this article is to illustrate the utility of multi-state models in cancer clinical trials. Our specific aims are to describe multi-state models and how they differ from standard survival methods, to illustrate how multi-state models can facilitate deeper understanding of the treatment effect on multiple paths along the disease process that patients could experience in cancer clinical trials, to explain the differences between multi-state models and time-dependent Cox models, and to briefly describe available software to conduct such analyses.Methods: Data from 717 newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia patients who enrolled in the CALGB 10603 trial were used as an illustrative example. The current probability-in-state was estimated using the Aalen–Johansen estimator. The restricted mean time in state was calculated as the area under the probability-in-state curves. Cox-type regression was used to evaluate the effect of midostaurin on the various clinical paths. Simulation was conducted using a newly constructed shiny application. All analyses were performed using the R software.Results: Multi-state model analyses of CALGB 10603 suggested that the overall improvement in survival with midostaurin seen in the primary analysis possibly resulted from a higher complete remission rate in combination with a lower risk of relapse and of death after complete remission in patients treated with midostaurin. Simulation results, in a three-state illness-death without recovery model, demonstrate that multi-state models and time-dependent Cox models evaluate treatment effects from different frameworks.Conclusion: Multi-state models allow detailed evaluation of treatment effects in complex clinical trial settings where patients can experience multiple paths between study enrollment and the final outcome. Multi-state models can be used as a complementary tool to standard survival analyses to provide deeper insights to the effects of treatment in trial settings with complex disease process.

1 January 2017 in Open Forum Infectious Diseases
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
RPRyan Peterson
Ryan Peterson
LPLinnea A. Polgreen
Linnea A. Polgreen
JCJoseph E. Cavanaugh
Joseph E. Cavanaugh
PPPhilip M Polgreen
Philip M Polgreen
Using data from the National Inpatient Sample, 1998–2013, we show that hospitalizations for cellulitis have approximately doubled. Costs increased by 118% to $3.74 billion annually. In addition, hospitalizations for cellulitis are highly seasonal, peaking in summer months: incidence during the peak month of July is 35% higher than in February.

1 February 2018 in The Journal of Arthroplasty
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
CAChris A. Anthony
Chris A. Anthony
RPRyan Peterson
Ryan Peterson
DSDaniel Sewell
Daniel Sewell
LPLinnea A. Polgreen
Linnea A. Polgreen
JSJacob Simmering
Jacob Simmering
PPPhilip M. Polgreen
Philip M. Polgreen