Due to a growing appreciation for the ecological and recreational benefits of public green spaces, the evaluation of urban parks’ service efficiency, as well as citizens’ behavioral preferences for daily recreation, have become an increasing academic focus. However, due to the lack of empirical approaches, existing research on exploring park service areas has been simplified by their use of Euclidean distance or buffer sets by simulation, ignoring the fact that the likelihood of citizens visiting urban parks is time sensitive. Utilizing mobile signaling data and web map services, this study proposes an approach to estimating the travel times of park visitors and analyzing the characteristics of park service areas from the perspective of actual time consumption. Taking Shanghai as a case study, this research firstly identified the time–cost decay of parks with different areas and locations. A comparison analysis was then used to examine the spatial relationship between park service areas and their accessibility defined by time consumption. The results show that (1) urban parks in Shanghai have larger mean service radii than existing planning guidelines, and park service areas were significantly influenced by park locations; (2) people have a great preference for urban parks whose travel times by public transit are under 40 min, and they have no desire to visit parks located within or outside the Middle Ring Road when the travel times reach 60 min and 75 min, respectively; (3) the shapes of park service areas are consistent with the high-accessibility districts defined by time thresholds, in spite of some differences caused by citizens’ choices. These findings provide an effective tool for evaluating the actual characteristics of park recreational services, along with direct implications for policymakers aiming to establish effective strategies for improving the accessibility and vitality of urban parks.

A road network is an important spatial carrier for the efficient and reliable operation of urban services and material flows. In recent years, the “high road density, small block size” trend has become a major focus in urban planning practices. However, whether high-density road networks are highly resilient lacks quantitative evidence. This study presents a multi-scale analytical framework for measuring road network resilience from a topological perspective. We abstract 186 ideal orthogonal grid density models from an actual urban road network, quantifying resilience under two disturbance scenarios: random failures and intentional attacks. The results indicate that road network density indeed has a significant impact on resilience, with both scenarios showing a trend where higher densities correlate with greater resilience. However, the increase in resilience value under the intentional attack scenario is significantly higher than that under the random failure scenario. The findings indicate that network density plays a decisive role in determining resilience levels when critical edges fail. This is attributed to the greater presence of loops in denser networks, which helps maintain connectivity even under intentional disruption. In the random failure scenario, network resilience depends on the combined effects of the node degree and density. This study offers quantitative insights into the design of resilient urban forms in the face of disruptive events, establishing reference benchmarks for road network spacing at both meso- and micro-scales. The results provide practical guidance for resilient city planning in both newly developed and existing urban areas, supporting informed decision-making in urban morphology and disaster risk management.

As concerns over the security of intercity connections intensify, the concept of urban network resilience has increasingly captured the attention of researchers in related fields. This study aimed to clarify the varying interpretations of urban network resilience among scholars and to identify the advancements and potential gaps in existing literature. The results indicated that differences in perceptions of urban networks have led scholars to define urban network resilience from two distinct perspectives. This divergence influenced the focal points of research, as well as the methodologies, structural measurement indicators, and optimization strategies employed in these studies. We argued for the need to further explore the concept of urban network resilience by considering the nuances of different urban networks, refining methodologies for the identification, description, and measurement of resilience, and recognizing the interconnections among various types and scales of urban networks. This review can provide scholars and policymakers with comprehensive insights into urban resilience, thereby assisting them in making more informed and effective decisions.