Genomic medicine is a powerful tool to improve diagnosis and outcomes for cancer patients by facilitating the delivery of the right drug at the right dose at the right time for the right patient. In 2023, a Canadian conference brought together leaders with expertise in different tumor types. The objective was to identify challenges and opportunities for change in terms of equitable and timely access to biomarker testing and reporting at the education, delivery, laboratory, patient, and health-system levels in Canada. Challenges identified included: limited patient and clinician awareness of genomic medicine options with need for formal education strategies; failure by clinicians to discuss genomic medicine with patients; delays in or no access to hereditary testing; lack of timely reporting of results; intra- and inter-provincial disparities in access; lack of funding for patients to access testing and for laboratories to provide testing; lack of standardized testing; and impact of social determinants of health. Canada must standardize its approach to biomarker testing across the country, with a view to addressing current inequities, and prioritize access to advanced molecular testing to ensure systems are in place to quickly bring innovation and evidence-based treatments to Canadian cancer patients, regardless of their place of residence or socioeconomic status.

Thoracic radiation therapy (TRT) and prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) are commonly used in the management of extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC); however, Phase III trials of first-line immunotherapy often excluded these options. Guidance is needed regarding appropriate use of TRT, PCI, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) surveillance while new data are awaited. In two web-based meetings, a pan-Canadian expert working group of five radiation oncologists and four medical oncologists addressed eight clinical questions regarding use of radiation therapy (RT) and MRI surveillance among patients with ES-SCLC receiving immunotherapy. A targeted literature review was conducted using PubMed and conference proceedings to identify recent (January 2019-April 2022) publications in this setting. Fifteen recommendations were developed; online voting was conducted to gauge agreement with each recommendation. After considering recently available evidence across lung cancer populations and clinical experience, the experts recommended that all patients with a response to chemo-immunotherapy, good performance status (PS), and limited metastases be considered for consolidation TRT (e.g., 30 Gy in 10 fractions). When considered appropriate after multidisciplinary team discussion, TRT can be initiated during maintenance immunotherapy. All patients who respond to concurrent chemo-immunotherapy should undergo restaging with brain MRI to guide decision-making regarding PCI versus MRI surveillance alone. MRI surveillance should be conducted for two years after response to initial therapy. PCI (e.g., 25 Gy in 10 fractions or 20 Gy in 5 fractions) can be considered for patients without central nervous system involvement who have a response to chemo-immunotherapy and good PS. Concurrent treatment with PCI and immunotherapy or with TRT, PCI, and immunotherapy is appropriate after completion of initial therapy. All recommendations were agreed upon unanimously. These consensus recommendations provide practical guidance regarding appropriate use of RT and immunotherapy in ES-SCLC while awaiting new clinical trial data.

Canada lacks a national drug insurance plan. The home province or territory of a patient determines which cancer drugs are available on the public formulary, who is eligible for public coverage and what portion of the financial burden of cancer care falls to the individual. This narrative review describes the current interprovincial disparities in access to cancer drugs across Canada. Health technology assessment (HTA) of drugs at a provincial and territory level is a closed process, does not necessarily follow the recommendations of national HTA and leads to further delays in drug access. The public coverage of take-home cancer drugs (THCDs) in Ontario and the Atlantic provinces is often fragmented, unnecessarily complex and a barrier to cancer drug access. Policy solutions to address inter-provincial formulary variation and poor access to THCDs are discussed.

Chemoradiotherapy (CRT) followed by durvalumab (CRT → durvalumab) is standard of care to treat patients with unresectable, stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The RELEVANCE study was designed to provide real-world effectiveness and safety data for CRT → durvalumab in Canadian settings. RELEVANCE was a retrospective, observational, multicenter chart review that included adult patients with unresectable, stage III NSCLC treated with CRT alone or CRT → durvalumab at 5 Canadian cancer centers. Key outcomes included treatment patterns, adverse events of special interest (AESI), and overall survival (OS). 487 patients were included (144 CRT alone; 343 CRT → durvalumab). Median follow-up was 43.1 and 35.8 months for the CRT alone and CRT → durvalumab groups, respectively. The most frequently observed regimen included radiotherapy dose 54-66 Gy and radiosensitizing carboplatin. Median treatment duration was 1.5 months (CRT alone) and 13.4 months (CRT → durvalumab), and 47 % of patients completed a full course of durvalumab. Median OS and 3-year OS rate were 21.3 months and 32 % for CRT alone and 44.6 months and 56 % for CRT → durvalumab. Exploratory analysis by programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression status of the CRT → durvalumab group noted 3-year OS rates of 69 %, 44 %, and 39 % in the PD-L1 ≥ 50 % (high), 1 %-49 % (intermediate), and < 1 % (negative) populations, respectively (32 %, 38 %, and 24 % for CRT alone, respectively). PD-L1 high expression was associated with lower risk of death vs. PD-L1 negative expression (P < 0.05). The most common AESI with CRT → durvalumab was pneumonitis. Median OS for patients who completed durvalumab was not reached and was 41.3 months among patients who discontinued durvalumab due to AEs. Results validate the treatment benefit and safety of the PACIFIC regimen in real-world Canadian settings. Among patients who received CRT → durvalumab, there was a correlation between increasing PD-L1 status and improved OS; however, shorter OS was observed in patients discontinuing durvalumab early due to AEs. Real-world Canadian RELEVANCE study validates effectiveness and safety of durvalumab in patients with unresectable, stage III NSCLC.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) affect immunologic homeostasis, leading to immune-related adverse events (irAEs). Early irAE detection and management can prevent significant morbidity and mortality. A retrospective chart review was performed to characterize irAEs associated with nivolumab, ipilimumab, and nivolumab plus ipilimumab in adult medical oncology patients in Nova Scotia Health-Central Zone from 2013–2020, and to describe adherence to toxicity management guidelines. Diarrhea/colitis, hepatitis, pneumonitis, nephrotoxicity, and cardiotoxicity were studied. Of 129 charts reviewed, 67 patients (51.9%) experienced at least one irAE for a total of 98 irAEs and a 1.5% fatality rate. Of these irAEs, 33.7% led to an emergency room visit. Patients were admitted to hospital and steroids were used in 24.5% and 35.7% of cases, respectively. In 17.3% of irAEs, ICIs were permanently discontinued. In 20.4% of irAEs, ICIs were held, and patients were monitored; while in 18.4%, ICIs were held until the irAE was Grade 0–1 (and until steroids were tapered). Almost 47% of irAEs were managed according to guidelines (14.3% were not), and 38.8% had no documented management. Patients receiving immunotherapy frequently experience irAEs with half of irAEs having documented management adhering to guidelines. As immunotherapy indications expand, it is important to ensure irAEs are documented and managed appropriately.