Miriam Casares-López

Dr. Miriam Casares-López

Laboratory of Vision Sciences and Applications, Department of Optics, University of Granada, 18010 Granada, Spain
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

10Years (2017-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 August 2018 in Accident Analysis & Prevention
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
COCarolina Ortiz
Carolina Ortiz
SOSonia Ortiz-Peregrina
Sonia Ortiz-Peregrina
José  J. Castro-TorresJosé J. Castro-Torres
José J. Castro-Torres
Miriam Casares-LópezMiriam Casares-López
Miriam Casares-López
CSC. Salas
C. Salas

SOSonia Ortiz-Peregrina
Sonia Ortiz-Peregrina
COCarolina Ortiz
Carolina Ortiz
Miriam Casares-LópezMiriam Casares-López
Miriam Casares-López
José  J. Castro-TorresJosé J. Castro-Torres
José J. Castro-Torres
LBLuis Jiménez del Barco
Luis Jiménez del Barco
RARosario G. Anera
Rosario G. Anera
Aging leads to impaired visual function, which can affect driving—a very visually demanding task—and has a direct impact on an individual’s quality of life if their license is withdrawn. This study examined the associations between age-related vision changes and simulated driving performance. To this end, we attempted to determine the most significant visual parameters in terms of evaluating elderly drivers’ eyesight. Twenty-one younger drivers (aged 25–40) were compared to 21 older drivers (aged 56–71). Study participants were assessed for visual acuity, contrast sensitivity, halos, and intraocular straylight, which causes veiling luminance on the retina and degrades vision. Driving performance was evaluated using a driving simulator. The relationships between simulated driving performance and the visual parameters tested were examined with correlation analyses and linear regression models. Older drivers presented impairment in most visual parameters (p < 0.05), with straylight being the most significantly affected (we also measured the associated effect size). Older drivers performed significantly worse (p < 0.05) in the simulator test, with a markedly lower performance in lane stability. The results of the multiple linear regression model evidenced that intraocular straylight is the best visual parameter for predicting simulated driving performance (R2 = 0.513). Older drivers have shown significantly poorer results in several aspects of visual function, as well as difficulties in driving simulator performance. Our results suggest that the non-standardized straylight evaluation could be significant in driver assessments, especially at the onset of age-related vision changes.

12 August 2020 in Scientific Reports
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Miriam Casares-LópezMiriam Casares-López
Miriam Casares-López
José  J. Castro-TorresJosé J. Castro-Torres
José J. Castro-Torres
FMFrancesco Martino
Francesco Martino
SOSonia Ortiz-Peregrina
Sonia Ortiz-Peregrina
COCarolina Ortiz
Carolina Ortiz
RARosario G. Anera
Rosario G. Anera
In this study, we aimed to investigate the effects of alcohol intake on visual function and driving performance, as well as on the relationship between these. A total of 40 healthy participants took part in three experimental sessions: one baseline session and two further sessions after consuming two different quantities of alcohol (300 ml and 450 ml of red wine). The breath alcohol content (BrAC) was measured using a breath analyzer. The contrast sensitivity and retinal straylight due to the forward intraocular scattering were measured to characterize visual function, and driving performance was assessed in three different scenarios using a driving simulator. The results showed a deterioration in contrast sensitivity and retinal straylight after drinking alcohol, in addition to an impaired ability to drive, especially for the highest alcohol intake. We also observed that the deteriorated driving performance was a function of the contrast sensitivity and retinal straylight under the effects of alcohol, indicating that these visual variables can partially predict driving performance in these conditions.

14 January 2020 in PLOS ONE
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SOSonia Ortiz-Peregrina
Sonia Ortiz-Peregrina
COCarolina Ortiz
Carolina Ortiz
CSCarlos Salas
Carlos Salas
Miriam Casares-LópezMiriam Casares-López
Miriam Casares-López
MSMargarita Soler
Margarita Soler
RARosario G Anera
Rosario G Anera
Cataracts can limit a person’s ability to perform vision-dependent tasks safely, affecting the quality of life of older people. This study examines the relationship between visual function and driving, by studying which visual parameters might be important for predicting driving performance in older drivers with and without cataracts, ascertaining whether the objective measurement of intraocular scattering should be considered in assessment procedures for older drivers. This cross-sectional study involved a total of 20 older drivers (10 patients with bilateral cataracts and 10 control subjects). All participants were examined for visual acuity, contrast sensitivity, visual discrimination capacity, and intraocular scattering. Driving performance was also tested using a driving simulator. To study the relationship between visual parameters and driving performance, a correlation analysis and regression model were used. Drivers with cataracts showed a significantly impaired (p<0.05) visual function, with an Objective Scattering Index (OSI) 3.5 times greater than the control group. Driving performance was also significantly worse (p<0.05) in drivers with cataracts, reflected by a notable deterioration in lane keeping. The correlation analysis showed significant associations between driving performance and all the visual parameters studied. Finally, the regression model revealed that the OSI was the best predictor of driving performance, accounting for 51.3% of its variance. Visual function and driving performance are markedly deteriorated when cataracts are present. Our results demonstrate that the objective scattering index (OSI) has a high predictive power when it comes to simulated driving performance in older drivers, both with and without cataracts, suggesting that scatter measurements could be important in helping better understand visual limitations in older drivers.

18 January 2021 in Scientific Reports
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SOSonia Ortiz-Peregrina
Sonia Ortiz-Peregrina
COCarolina Ortiz
Carolina Ortiz
Miriam Casares-LópezMiriam Casares-López
Miriam Casares-López
JJJosé R. Jiménez
José R. Jiménez
RARosario G. Anera
Rosario G. Anera
Cannabis is one of the most used drugs of abuse in the world. The objective of this study was to analyze the effects of smoking cannabis on vision and to relate these to those perceived by the user. Thirty-one cannabis users participated in this study. Visual function assessment was carried out in a baseline session as well as after smoking cannabis. We evaluated static visual acuity, contrast sensitivity, stereoacuity, accommodative response, straylight, night-vision disturbances (halos) and pupil size. The participants were also divided into two groups depending on whether they perceived their vision to have worsened after smoking cannabis. A logistic regression analysis was employed to identify which visual test could best predict self-perceived visual effects. The study found that smoking cannabis has significant adverse effects on all the visual parameters analyzed (p < 0.05). Self-perceived visual quality results revealed that about two thirds of the sample think that smoking cannabis impairs their vision. Contrast sensitivity, specifically for the spatial frequency 18 cpd, was identified as the only visual parameter significantly associated with self-perceived visual quality (Odds Ratio: 1.135; p = 0.040). Smoking cannabis is associated with negative effects on visual function. Self-perceived visual quality after smoking cannabis could be related to impaired contrast sensitivity.

23 April 2021 in Biomedical Optics Express
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
José  J. Castro-TorresJosé J. Castro-Torres
José J. Castro-Torres
FMFrancesco Martino
Francesco Martino
Miriam Casares-LópezMiriam Casares-López
Miriam Casares-López
SOSonia Ortiz-Peregrina
Sonia Ortiz-Peregrina
COCarolina Ortiz
Carolina Ortiz
We induced and evaluated different levels of retinal-image degradation using Bangerter foils and fog filters. We found increased straylight and an important deterioration in visual performance, assessed by means of visual acuity, contrast threshold, and visual discrimination capacity. Bangerter foils induced forward scattering levels comparable to those observed in mature to severe cataracts, with an important impact of halos and starbursts. Fog filters induced lower levels of intraocular scattering, although luminous veils and circular halos were reported. The visual disturbance index positively correlated with intraocular scattering and straylight. Our results show retinal-image quality has an important influence on night-vision performance.