Oleg V. VLADIMIROVICH Mitrokhin

Prof. Oleg V. VLADIMIROVICH Mitrokhin

Sechenov University
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

26Years (2001-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Yury V. ZhernovYury V. Zhernov
Yury V. Zhernov
MSMark Simanduyev
Mark Simanduyev
OZOlga K. Zaostrovtseva
Olga K. Zaostrovtseva
ESEkaterina Semeniako
Ekaterina Semeniako
KKKseniia I. Kolykhalova
Kseniia I. Kolykhalova
Oleg V. VLADIMIROVICH MitrokhinOleg V. VLADIMIROVICH Mitrokhin
Oleg V. VLADIMIROVICH Mitrokhin
Scombroid food poisoning (SFP) is a foodborne disease that develops after consumption of fresh fish and, rarely, seafood that has fine organoleptic characteristics but contains a large amount of exogenous histamine. SFP, like other food pseudo-allergic reactions (FPA), is a disorder that is clinically identical to allergic reactions type I, but there are many differences in their pathogenesis. To date, SFP has been widespread throughout the world and is an urgent problem, although exact epidemiological data on incidence varies greatly. The need to distinguish SFP from true IgE-associated allergy to fish and seafood is one of the most difficult examples of the differential diagnosis of allergic conditions. The most important difference is the absence of an IgE response in SFP. The pathogenesis of SFP includes a complex system of interactions between the body and chemical triggers such as exogenous histamine, other biogenic amines, cis-urocanic acid, salicylates, and other histamine liberators. Because of the wide range of molecular pathways involved in this process, it is critical to understand their differences. This may help predict and prevent poor outcomes in patients and contribute to the development of adequate hygienic rules and regulations for seafood product safety. Despite the vast and lengthy history of research on SFP mechanisms, there are still many blank spots in our understanding of this condition. The goals of this review are to differentiate various molecular mechanisms of SFP and describe methods of hygienic regulation of some biogenic amines that influence the concentration of histamine in the human body and play an important role in the mechanism of SFP.

6 October 2020 in Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
VRVladimir Reshetnikov
Vladimir Reshetnikov
Oleg V. VLADIMIROVICH MitrokhinOleg V. VLADIMIROVICH Mitrokhin
Oleg V. VLADIMIROVICH Mitrokhin
NSNataliya Shepetovskaya
Nataliya Shepetovskaya
Elena BelovaElena Belova
Elena Belova
Mihajlo JakovljevicMihajlo Jakovljevic
Mihajlo Jakovljevic
Background Coronavirus infection (COVID-19) spreading took place in the Russian Federation in recent months. Russia has a reliable and effective governmental public health infrastructure that worked at an advanced level to control the situation since the first day of receiving reports about pneumonia of unknown etiology cases in December 2019 and the registration of the first COVID-19 cases in Wuhan, China, in January 2020. Several measures were applied (administrative, organizational, technical, sanitary, and hygiene), nevertheless, creating an adequate response to the COVID-19 pandemic was a challenge for the Russian national public health authorities. Areas covered We used official information of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Service for Surveillance on Consumer Rights Protection and Human Wellbeing (Rospotrebnadzor), the Russian Federation Government, and Moscow Government, and the official World Health Organization (WHO); the analysis was conducted between 1st December 2019 and 31st March 2020. Expert opinion Rospotrebnadzor implemented a set of measures which comprised of three stages: 1. Stage 1 (Preventive and sanitary measures): Preventing or restricting the spread of COVID-19; 2. Stage 2 (Organizational and technical measures): Preparing connections and health facilities for the possible spread of infection; 3. Stage 3 (Organizational and preventive measures): Enforcement of self-isolation for citizens for more than 30 days, and social support measures.

Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Yury V. ZhernovYury V. Zhernov
Yury V. Zhernov
SVSonya O. Vysochanskaya
Sonya O. Vysochanskaya
VSVitaly A. Sukhov
Vitaly A. Sukhov
OZOlga K. Zaostrovtseva
Olga K. Zaostrovtseva
DGDenis Sergeevich Gorshenin
Denis Sergeevich Gorshenin
Oleg V. VLADIMIROVICH MitrokhinOleg V. VLADIMIROVICH Mitrokhin
Oleg V. VLADIMIROVICH Mitrokhin
Food hypersensitivity is a group of diseases arising from a specific immune response that reproduces on exposure to a given food. The current understanding of molecular mechanisms and immunopathology of non-IgE-mediated/mixed food hypersensitivity, e.g., eosinophilic esophagitis, contains many gaps in knowledge. This review aims to provide a modern classification and identify the primary diseases of non-IgE-mediated/mixed food hypersensitivity reactions, delineate the distinctive molecular features, and discuss recent findings in the immunopathology of eosinophilic esophagitis that may become a basis to develop valid biomarkers and novel therapies for this disease. Eosinophilic esophagitis is a recently recognized allergic-mediated disease with eosinophil-predominant esophagus inflammation. Its pathogenesis is a complicated network of interactions and signaling between epithelial, mesenchymal, and immune cells on molecular and intercellular levels. Alterations produced by overactivation of some cytokine signaling pathways, e.g., IL-13 or thymic stromal lymphopoietin (TSLP), were evolved and observed in this review from the viewpoints of molecular, genetic, epigenetic, and transcriptomic changes. Despite substantial experimental data, the reliable and representative mechanism of eosinophilic esophagitis pathogenesis has yet to show itself. So, the place of esophagitis between mixed and non-IgE-mediated allergic disorders and between eosinophilic gastrointestinal disorders currently seems vague and unclear.

Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ESEkaterina Sidorova
Ekaterina Sidorova
Yury V. ZhernovYury V. Zhernov
Yury V. Zhernov
MAMarina A. Antsupova
Marina A. Antsupova
KKKamilya Khadzhieva
Kamilya Khadzhieva
AIAngelina Adelevna Izmailova
Angelina Adelevna Izmailova
Oleg V. VLADIMIROVICH MitrokhinOleg V. VLADIMIROVICH Mitrokhin
Oleg V. VLADIMIROVICH Mitrokhin
Micro ribonucleic acids (microRNAs or miRNAs) form a distinct subtype of non-coding RNA and are widely recognized as one of the most significant gene expression regulators in mammalian cells. Mechanistically, the regulation occurs through microRNA binding with its response elements in the 3’-untranslated region of target messenger RNAs (mRNAs), resulting in the post-transcriptional silencing of genes, expressing target mRNAs. Compared to small interfering RNAs, microRNAs have more complex regulatory patterns, making them suitable for fine-tuning gene expressions in different tissues. Dysregulation of microRNAs is well known as one of the causative factors in malignant cell growth. Today, there are numerous data points regarding microRNAs in different cancer transcriptomes, the specificity of microRNA expression changes in various tissues, and the predictive value of specific microRNAs as cancer biomarkers. Breast cancer (BCa) is the most common cancer in women worldwide and seriously impairs patients’ physical health. Its incidence has been predicted to rise further. Mounting evidence indicates that microRNAs play key roles in tumorigenesis and development. Prostate cancer (PCa) is one of the most commonly diagnosed cancers in men. Different microRNAs play an important role in PCa. Early diagnosis of BCa and PCa using microRNAs is very useful for improving individual outcomes in the framework of predictive, preventive, and personalized (3P) medicine, thereby reducing the economic burden. This article reviews the roles of different types of microRNA in BCa and PCa progression.

VRVladimir Reshetnikov
Vladimir Reshetnikov
Oleg V. VLADIMIROVICH MitrokhinOleg V. VLADIMIROVICH Mitrokhin
Oleg V. VLADIMIROVICH Mitrokhin
Elena BelovaElena Belova
Elena Belova
VMVictor Mikhailovsky
Victor Mikhailovsky
MMMaria Mikerova
Maria Mikerova
VRValery Royuk
Valery Royuk
The novel coronavirus (COVID-19) outbreak is a public health emergency of international concern, and as a response, public health authorities started enforcing preventive measures like self-isolation and social distancing. The enforcement of isolation has consequences that may affect the lifestyle-related behavior of the general population. Quarantine encompasses a range of strategies that can be used to detain, isolate, or conditionally release individuals or populations infected or exposed to contagious diseases and should be tailored to circumstances. Interestingly, medical students may represent an example of how the COVID-19 pandemic can form new habits and change lifestyle behaviors. We conducted a web-based survey to assess changes in lifestyle-related behavior of self-isolated medical students during the COVID-19 pandemic. Then we analyzed the sanitary-hygienic regulations of the Russian Federation to determine the requirements for healthy buildings. Results showed that during the pandemic, the enforcement of isolation affects medical students’ lifestyle-related behavior and accompanies an increase in non-communicable diseases (NCDs). Indoor environmental quality (IEQ) and healthy buildings are cutting-edge factors in preventing COVID-19 and NCDs. The Russian sanitary-hygienic regulations support improving this factor with suitable requirements for ventilation, sewage, waste management, and disinfection. Herein, assessing isolation is possible through the hygienic self-isolation index.