Angiogenesis is essential for tumour growth and metastasis. Antiangiogenic factor-targeting drugs have been approved as first line agents in a variety of oncology treatments. Clinical drugs frequently target the VEGF signalling pathway during sprouting angiogenesis. Accumulating evidence suggests that tumours can evade antiangiogenic therapy through other angiogenesis mechanisms in addition to the vascular sprouting mechanism involving endothelial cells. These mechanisms include (1) sprouting angiogenesis, (2) vasculogenic mimicry, (3) vessel intussusception, (4) vascular co-option, (5) cancer stem cell-derived angiogenesis, and (6) bone marrow-derived angiogenesis. Other non-sprouting angiogenic mechanisms are not entirely dependent on the VEGF signalling pathway. In clinical practice, the conversion of vascular mechanisms is closely related to the enhancement of tumour drug resistance, which often leads to clinical treatment failure. This article summarizes recent studies on six processes of tumour angiogenesis and provides suggestions for developing more effective techniques to improve the efficacy of antiangiogenic treatment.

Chemotherapy, radiotherapy, targeted therapy, and immunotherapy have brought hope to cancer patients. With the prolongation of survival of cancer patients and increased clinical experience, cancer-therapy-induced cardiovascular toxicity has attracted attention. The adverse effects of cancer therapy that can lead to life-threatening or induce long-term morbidity require rational approaches to prevention and treatment, which requires deeper understanding of the molecular biology underpinning the disease. In addition to the drugs used widely for cardio-protection, traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) formulations are also efficacious and can be expected to achieve “personalized treatment” from multiple perspectives. Moreover, the increased prevalence of cancer in patients with cardiovascular disease has spurred the development of “reverse cardio-oncology”, which underscores the urgency of collaboration between cardiologists and oncologists. This review summarizes the mechanisms by which cancer therapy induces cardiovascular toxicity, the combination of antineoplastic and cardioprotective drugs, and recent advances in reverse cardio-oncology.

Lactobacillus johnsonii -derived extracellular vesicles (LJ-EVs) improve gut microbiota disruption and metabolism in colitis mice, while activating the Nrf2/HO-1 antioxidant signaling pathway to maintain intestinal barrier homeostasis.

Doxorubicin (DOX) is an extensively used chemotherapeutic agent that can cause severe and frequent cardiotoxicity, which limits its clinical application. Although there have been extensive researches on the cardiotoxicity caused by DOX, there is still a lack of effective treatment. It is necessary to understand the molecular mechanism of DOX-induced cardiotoxicity and search for new therapeutic targets which do not sacrifice their anticancer effects. Mitochondria are considered to be the main target of cardiotoxicity caused by DOX. The imbalance of mitochondrial dynamics characterized by increased mitochondrial fission and inhibited mitochondrial fusion is often reported in DOX-induced cardiotoxicity, which can result in excessive ROS production, energy metabolism disorders, cell apoptosis, and various other problems. Also, mitochondrial dynamics disorder is related to tumorigenesis. Surprisingly, recent studies show that targeting mitochondrial dynamics proteins such as DRP1 and MFN2 can not only defend against DOX-induced cardiotoxicity but also enhance or not impair the anticancer effect. Herein, we summarize mitochondrial dynamics disorder in DOX-induced cardiac injury. Furthermore, we provide an overview of current pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions targeting proteins involved in mitochondrial dynamics to alleviate cardiac damage caused by DOX.

Bone metastasis is a key contributor to morbidity and mortality of breast cancer patients. We have previously shown that exosomal miRNAs derived from LSD1 knockdown (KD) breast cancer cells inhibit osteoblast differentiation and promote osteoclast differentiation. However, how LSD1 regulates exosomal miRNAs and whether miRNAs promote bone metastasis through the formation of pre-metastatic niches remains unclear. In vivo experiments demonstrates that exosomes derived from LSD1 KD breast cancer cells significantly promoted bone metastasis. To explore the mechanism underlying the effect of LSD1 on exosomes in breast cancer cells, exosomal and cellular miRNAs from control, LSD1 KD, and rescue cells were sequenced. Interestingly, approximately 80% of LSD1-associated miRNAs were downregulated in exosomes from LSD1 KD cells. The consensus sequence UAGGGC, was identified in many miRNAs downregulated in LSD1 KD exosomes. We found that hnRNPA2B1 regulated the exosomal sorting of miR-6881-3p and some other miRNAs. LSD1 deficiency reduced hnRNPA2B1 expression in breast cancer cells by decreasing the level of H3K9me2 demethylation in the promoter region of the hnRNPA2B1 gene. Our study revealed that LSD1 plays a crucial role in the regulation of exosomal sorting of miRNA.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the combination of docetaxel (TXT) plus tamoxifen (TAM) in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients who had received platinum-based first-line chemotherapy. A total of 120 advanced NSCLC patients pretreated with platinum-based chemotherapy were randomized into two treatment groups (the TXT and TXT+TAM groups) in a 1 : 1 ratio. Reversal of P-glycoprotein (P-gp) expression, tumor response, progression-free survival, overall survival, and safety were evaluated on an intention-to-treat basis. The median number of cycles of allocated chemotherapy was four in each treatment group (range: 2-6 cycles). The overall response rate and disease control rate in the TXT+TAM group were significantly higher than those in the TXT group (36.7 vs. 15.0% for overall response rate, P=0.007; 85.0 vs. 68.3% for disease control rate, P=0.031). The combination of TXT and TAM could effectively reverse P-gp expression in tumor tissues and provide a significant survival benefit for advanced NSCLC patients compared with TXT alone (11.6 vs. 9.1 months, P=0.030). In addition, in the TXT+TAM group, patients achieving P-gp reversal had a significantly greater median progression-free survival and overall survival than nonreversal patients. Furthermore, the combined therapy showed a safety profile comparable to that of TXT. The combination of TXT and TAM may be an effective and safe treatment option for advanced NSCLC patients who have already developed P-gp-mediated multidrug resistance.