Pascal LAFON

Prof. Dr. Pascal LAFON

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

27Years (2000-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 August 2008 in Ocean Engineering
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
GEGhassan Elchahal
Ghassan Elchahal
RYRafic Younes
Rafic Younes
PLPascal LAFON
Pascal LAFON

30 May 2021 in Applied Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MZMarouene ZOUAOUI
Marouene ZOUAOUI
JGJulien Gardan
Julien Gardan
PLPascal LAFON
Pascal LAFON
AMAli Makke
Ali Makke
CLCarl Labergere
Carl Labergere
NRNaman RECHO
Naman RECHO
In this paper, a numerical method is proposed to simulate the mechanical behavior of a new polymeric pre-structured material manufactured by fused filament fabrication (FFF), where the filaments are oriented along the principal stress directions. The model implements optimized filament orientations, obtained from the G code by assigning materials references in mesh elements. The Gauss points are later configured with the physical behavior while considering a homogeneous solid structure. The objective of this study is to identify the elastoplastic behavior. Therefore, tensile tests were conducted with different filament orientations. The results show that using appropriate material constants is efficient in describing the built anisotropy and incorporating the air gap volume fraction. The suggested method is proved very efficient in implementing multiplex G code orientations. The elastic behavior of the pre-structured material is quasi-isotropic. However, the anisotropy was observed at the yield point and the ultimate stress. Using the Hill criterion coupled with an experimental tabular law of the plastic flow turns out to be suitable for predicting the response of various specimens.

1 January 2002 in Engineering Optimization
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
LGLaurence Giraud-Moreau
Laurence Giraud-Moreau
PLPascal LAFON
Pascal LAFON
Two evolutionary algorithms - the genetic algorithm and the evolution strategy - are compared in respect of mechanical design problems. Mechanical design problems are real world problems, characterized by a number of inequality constraints, nonlinear equations, mixed discrete-continuous variables and the presence of interdependent discrete parameters whose values are taken from standardized tables. The selection, recombination and mutation operators, and the chosen constraint-handling method are presented for both the genetic algorithm and the evolution strategy. In order to find the best combination of operators for each algorithm which will solve mechanical design problems, a number of selection and recombination operators are compared in respect of these problems. A comparison of these two algorithms with regard to three mechanical design problems extends the results of comparisons presented in the literature for unimodal and multimodal test functions with continuous variables only, and without constraints.

1 January 2018 in IFAC-PapersOnLine
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
EAElnaz Asadollahi-Yazdi
Elnaz Asadollahi-Yazdi
JGJulien Gardan
Julien Gardan
PLPascal LAFON
Pascal LAFON

1 January 2017 in Procedia CIRP
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
EAElnaz Asadollahi-Yazdi
Elnaz Asadollahi-Yazdi
JGJulien Gardan
Julien Gardan
PLPascal LAFON
Pascal LAFON

1 May 2013 in Ocean Engineering
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
GEGhassan Elchahal
Ghassan Elchahal
RYRafic Younes
Rafic Younes
PLPascal LAFON
Pascal LAFON