Background: Neuromyelitis optica (NMO) shows various brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) abnormalities with recurrent central nervous system (CNS) attacks, although predominantly affecting the spinal cord and optic nerve. However, NMO with extensive involvement of the brain has infrequently been studied. We investigated the clinical, radiographic features and immunomodulating changes of NMO patients with extensive brain lesions (EBLs) in China. Methods: NMO patients (including 16 NMO patients with EBLs and 53 NMO patients without EBLs) hospitalized during January 2006 and February 2010 were recruited and analyzed retrospectively. Data of clinical characteristics, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) features, laboratory abnormalities, treatment details and outcomes were analyzed. All the patients received the follow-up visits for two years. Results: EBLs in NMO were classified into four categories according to their respective MRI characteristics: 1) Tumefactive-like lesions (n=4, 25%); 2) Acute disseminated encephalomyelitis (ADEM)-like lesions (n=6, 37.5%); 3) Multiple sclerosis (MS)-like lesions (n=5, 31.25%); 4) Posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome (PRES)-like lesions (n=1, 6.25%). NMO patients with EBLs had higher rates of encephalopathy symptoms (37.5% vs. 5.6%, p = 0.004), homonymous hemianopia (18.8% vs. 0%, p = 0.011) and AQP4 seropositivity (100% vs. 69.8%, p = 0.008) than NMO patients without EBLs (NEBLs). Immunomodulating changes (including the levels of C3, C4, ESR and CRP) were significantly higher in patients with EBLs than those without EBLs. The relapse times in EBLs during the follow-up period were more frequent than those happened in NEBLs (1.88 ± 0.30 vs. 1.23 ± 0.14, p = 0.04). The EDSS scores in EBLs patients were also much higher than those in NEBLs throughout all the whole visits of follow-up. Conclusions: The presence of EBLs in NMO may indicate a higher diseases activity and portend a worse prognosis. CRP is a useful marker in monitoring diseases activity. Systemic inflammation may be crucial to the formation of EBLs in NMO.

Objectives: Metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) has been applied more and more widely for the diagnosis of infectious diseases, but its performance in the diagnosis of cryptococcal meningitis (CM) remains unclear.Methods: Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) samples from 197 HIV-negative patients with suspected central nervous system infections were tested simultaneously by mNGS and routine methods [India ink staining, fungal culture, or cryptococcal antigen (CrAg) tests]. The performance of mNGS was evaluated.Results: Of the 197 enrolled cases, 46 (23.4%) cases were finally diagnosed with CM, including 43 (93.5%) Cryptococcus neoformans infections and 3 (6.5%) Cryptococcus gattii infections. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and concordance rate of mNGS were 93.5% [95% confidence interval (CI) at 86.4%~100.0%], 96.0% (95% CI at 92.9%~99.1%), 87.8%, 98.0%, and 95.4%, respectively. Comparing to the conventional diagnostic methods, the sensitivity and concordance rate of mNGS were slightly lower than those of CrAg tests (97.4%) but higher than those of India ink (63.0%) and culture (76.7%). Besides, mNGS had a sensitivity of 100.0% against culture. It should be noted that mNGS could identify Cryptococcus at species level; C. gattii of the 3 cases was only distinguished by mNGS.Conclusions: CSF mNGS can be considered as a supplementary test to diagnose CM and directly distinguish C. gattii from C. neoformans in clinical specimens.

To assess the efficacy/safety of ivarmacitinib, a selective Janus kinase (JAK) 1 inhibitor, in patients with moderate-to-severe active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who had an inadequate response to conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (csDMARDs). Patients were randomised (1:1:1) to receive either placebo (n=188), ivarmacitinib 4 mg (n=189) or ivarmacitinib 8 mg (n=189) once daily, with background csDMARDs allowed. After 24 weeks, patients on placebo switched to ivarmacitinib 4 mg for an additional 28 weeks, while those on ivarmacitinib continued their initial dosage. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients achieving a 20% improvement in the American College of Rheumatology response criteria (ACR20) at week 24. At week 24, ACR20 response rates were significantly higher in the ivarmacitinib 4 mg (70.4%) and 8 mg (75.1%) groups compared with the placebo group (40.4%; both p<0.0001). Both ivarmacitinib doses achieved numerically higher Disease Activity Score 28-joint count C reactive protein of <2.6/≤3.2 response rates compared with placebo. Improvements in efficacy and patient-reported outcomes were sustained through 52 weeks and were noted in patients who switched from placebo after week 24. During the placebo-controlled period, treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) occurred in 81.5% and 90.5% of patients in the ivarmacitinib 4 mg and 8 mg groups, versus 79.3% in the placebo group. Infection-related TEAEs were slightly higher in the ivarmacitinib groups. Ivarmacitinib may offer a potential therapeutic option for patients with RA who have an inadequate response to csDMARDs, with a safety profile that was generally manageable over 1 year of treatment and similar to other JAK inhibitors. NCT04333771.

Background: Studies have demonstrated that antinuclear antibodies (ANAs) may be correlated with neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD). However, the conflicting results of studies about the value of ANAs in AQP4 antibody‐positive NMOSD patients need to be further investigated.Material: Case data were collected from 143 patients with AQP4 antibody‐positive NMOSD. Patients were divided into two groups based on the ANA test results. The analysis of clinical characteristics, laboratory tests, and MRI examination results were compared between two groups: the NMOSD patients with ANA (+) and with ANA (−).Results: Disease duration of NMOSD is shorter in the ANA (+) patients with EDSS < 4 than in the ANA (−) patients (12.05 ± 16.73 versus 29.43 ± 41.03, p‐value = .013). The median time from disease onset to an EDSS score of 4.0 is significantly longer in the ANA (−) NMOSD patients than in the ANA (+) patients (48.2 months versus 24 months, p = .04). In addition, ANA (RR, 2.234; 95% CI, 1.078–4.629; p‐value = .031) can predict the severity of NMOSD.Conclusions: Antinuclear antibodies seem to be associated with more severe disease activity in NMOSD patients.

Objective: Gastric cancer (GC) is a common tumor malignancy with high incidence and poor prognosis. Radiotherapy is one of the main strategies for GC treatment, while development of radioresistance limits the effectiveness. microRNA-203 (miR-203) has been reported to participate in progression of GC, whereas its interaction with radiosensitivity of GC and the related mechanism remain largely unclear. Methods: The expressions of miR-203 and zinc finger E-box binding homeobox 1 (ZEB1) were measured in GC tissues and cells by quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction or western blot. Survival fraction, cell viability and apoptosis were measured in GC cells after treatment of radiation by colony formation, 3-(4,5-dimethyl-2-thiazolyl)-2,5-diphenyl-2-H-tetrazolium bromide (MTT) assay or flow cytometry, respectively. Tumor volume and weight were detected in murine xenograft model after radiation treatment. The interaction between miR-203 and ZEB1 was explored by bioinformatics analysis and luciferase activity assay. Results: miR-203 expression was down-regulated and ZEB1 mRNA level was up-regulated in GC. The expression of miR-203 was associated with radiosensitivity of GC cells. Moreover, overexpression of miR-203 decreased survival fraction, cell viability and tumor growth but promoted cell apoptosis in radiation-treated GC cells. However, knockdown of miR-203 played an opposite effect. ZEB1 was validated as a target of miR-203, and it was involved in miR-203-mediated radiosensitivity of GC cells in vitro and in vivo. Conclusion: miR-203 promoted radiosensitivity of GC cells by targeting ZEB1, indicating miR-203 as a promising radiosensitizer for GC treatment.