Erika Borella

Prof. Dr. Erika Borella

Department of General Psychology, University of Padova, Padova, Italy
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

24Years (2003-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 June 2009 in Learning and Individual Differences
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
BCBarbara Carretti
Barbara Carretti
Erika BorellaErika Borella
Erika Borella
CCCesare Cornoldi
Cesare Cornoldi
RBRossana De Beni
Rossana De Beni

6 July 2010 in Journal of Learning Disabilities
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Erika BorellaErika Borella
Erika Borella
BCBarbara Carretti
Barbara Carretti
SPSantiago Pelegrina
Santiago Pelegrina
Difficulties in inhibitory processes have been shown to characterize the performance of poor comprehenders. However, the inhibitory inefficiency of poor comprehenders is most often assessed by their resistance to proactive interference, that is, the ability to suppress off-goal task information from working memory (WM). In two studies tasks assessing resistance to proactive interference (intrusion errors), response to distracters (Text With Distracters task) and prepotent response inhibition (Stroop and Hayling tests), along with WM measures, were administered to children aged 10 to 11, both good and poor comprehenders. The aim of the study was to specifically determine whether general or specific inhibitory factors affect poor comprehenders’ reading difficulties. Results showed that poor comprehenders, compared to good ones, are impaired in WM tasks and in inhibitory tasks that assess resistance to proactive interference. This suggests that reading comprehension difficulties of poor comprehenders are related to specific inhibitory problems.

1 January 2010 in Psychology and Aging
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Erika BorellaErika Borella
Erika Borella
BCBarbara Carretti
Barbara Carretti
FRFrancesco Riboldi
Francesco Riboldi
RBRossana De Beni
Rossana De Beni
Few studies have examined working memory (WM) training-related gains and their transfer and maintenance effects in older adults. This present research investigates the efficacy of a verbal WM training program in adults aged 65-75 years, considering specific training gains on a verbal WM (criterion) task as well as transfer effects on measures of visuospatial WM, short-term memory, inhibition, processing speed, and fluid intelligence. Maintenance of training benefits was evaluated at 8-month follow-up. Trained older adults showed higher performance than did controls on the criterion task and maintained this benefit after 8 months. Substantial general transfer effects were found for the trained group, but not for the control one. Transfer maintenance gains were found at follow-up, but only for fluid intelligence and processing speed tasks. The results are discussed in terms of cognitive plasticity in older adults.

1 May 2008 in Acta Psychologica
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Erika BorellaErika Borella
Erika Borella
BCBarbara Carretti
Barbara Carretti
RBRossana De Beni
Rossana De Beni

1 January 2007 in Experimental Psychology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
BCBarbara Carretti
Barbara Carretti
Erika BorellaErika Borella
Erika Borella
RBRossana De Beni
Rossana De Beni
The paper examines the effect of strategic training on the performance of younger and older adults in an immediate list-recall and a working memory task. The experimental groups of younger and older adults received three sessions of memory training, teaching the use of mental images to improve the memorization of word lists. In contrast, the control groups were not instructed to use any particular strategy, but they were requested to carry out the memory exercises. The results showed that strategic training improved performance of both the younger and older experimental groups in the immediate list recall and in the working memory task. Of particular interest, the improvement in working memory performance of the older experimental group was comparable to that of the younger experimental group.

20 October 2021 in Health Psychology Review
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ESEnrico Sella
Enrico Sella
LMLaura Miola
Laura Miola
ETEnrico Toffalini
Enrico Toffalini
Erika BorellaErika Borella
Erika Borella
This study examined the available literature concerning the association between sleep quality and quality of life (QoL) in autonomous older people with no sleep disorders. A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted on studies identified in the PsychInfo, PubMed and Scopus databases that examined the associations between QoL and sleep quality in older adults. Our systematic literature search identified 23 studies concerning a total of 21,092 participants (range of mean ages: 58-79 years). The results showed that self-reported sleep quality, but not objective sleep quality, correlated positively with QoL with a moderate effect size (for self-reported sleep quality, the overall estimate of the average effect size was a Pearson’s r=.28 [95% CI: .34, .23]; for objective sleep quality, it wasr=.01 [.12, -.09]). This also applied to the main domains of QoL concerning physical and psychological health, social relationships and environmental aspects (the estimated average effect sizes ranged from Pearson’s r=.13 to r=.35). These findings highlight the influence of sleep quality, and particularly of self-reported sleep quality, on QoL (as a whole and in its specific domains) in older adults with normal aging and no insomnia. This influence should therefore be investigated systematically when examining QoL.