Cesare Cornoldi

Prof. Cesare Cornoldi


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

51Years (1976-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 June 2009 in Learning and Individual Differences
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
BCBarbara Carretti
Barbara Carretti
Erika BorellaErika Borella
Erika Borella
CCCesare Cornoldi
Cesare Cornoldi
RBRossana De Beni
Rossana De Beni

1 April 1999 in Applied Cognitive Psychology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
MDMichel Denis
Michel Denis
FPFrancesca Pazzaglia
Francesca Pazzaglia
CCCesare Cornoldi
Cesare Cornoldi
LBLaura Bertolo
Laura Bertolo

1 October 2008 in Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ZCZ Cattaneo
Z Cattaneo
TVT Vecchi
T Vecchi
CCCesare Cornoldi
Cesare Cornoldi
IMI Mammarella
I Mammarella
DBD Bonino
D Bonino
PPP Pietrini
P Pietrini

1 March 2001 in Memory & Cognition
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Paola PalladinoPaola Palladino
Paola Palladino
CCCesare Cornoldi
Cesare Cornoldi
RBRossana De Beni
Rossana De Beni
FPFrancesca Pazzaglia
Francesca Pazzaglia

1 January 2004 in American Journal on Mental Retardation
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SLSilvia Lanfranchi
Silvia Lanfranchi
CCCesare Cornoldi
Cesare Cornoldi
RVRenzo Vianello
Renzo Vianello
The hypothesis that deficits of children with Down syndrome on working memory tasks are more evident the higher the control required and for verbal than visuospatial tasks was tested. Two groups of children, one with Down syndrome, who ranged in age from 7 to 18, and a control group were assessed with batteries of verbal and visuospatial working memory tests requiring different levels of control. On tasks requiring low control, children with Down syndrome showed impairment of verbal but not visuospatial working memory tasks. As the requirement for control increased, they showed greater impairment on both tasks. Children with Down syndrome were comparatively better in visuospatial than verbal tasks. Implications of these results for working memory models and the role of working memory in intelligence were discussed.

1 May 1998 in The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
RBRossana De Beni
Rossana De Beni
Paola PalladinoPaola Palladino
Paola Palladino
FPFrancesca Pazzaglia
Francesca Pazzaglia
CCCesare Cornoldi
Cesare Cornoldi
This study tests the hypothesis that the ability to inhibit already processed and actually irrelevant information could influence performance in the listening span test (Daneman & Carpenter, 1980) and have a crucial role in reading comprehension. In two experiments, the listening span test and a new working memory test were given to two groups of young adults, poor and good comprehenders, matched for logical reasoning ability. In Experiment 1, the poor comprehenders had a significantly lower performance in the listening span test associated to a higher number of intrusions—that is, recalled words that, in spite of being in sentence form, were not placed in the last position. In Experiment 2, a new working memory test was devised in order to analyse more effectively the occurrence of intrusions. Subjects were required to listen to a growing series of strings of animal and non-animal words. Whilst listening, they had to detect when an animal word occurred, and at the end of each series they had to recall the last word of each string. The poor comprehenders obtained a significantly lower performance in the memory task and made a higher number of intrusions, particularly of animal words.