Rosa M Cárdaba-García

Mrs. Rosa M Cárdaba-García

Universidad de Valladolid
+1
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

10Years (2017-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
CMCarmen M Martínez-Caballero
Carmen M Martínez-Caballero
Rosa M Cárdaba-GarcíaRosa M Cárdaba-García
Rosa M Cárdaba-García
RVRocío Varas-Manovel
Rocío Varas-Manovel
LGLaura M García-Sanz
Laura M García-Sanz
JMJorge Martínez-Piedra
Jorge Martínez-Piedra
Rosa M Cárdaba-GarcíaRosa M Cárdaba-García
Rosa M Cárdaba-García
The early stages of the COVID-19 pandemic presented the characteristics of a traumatic event that could trigger post-traumatic stress disorder. Emergency Medical Services workers are already a high-risk group due to their professional development. The research project aimed to analyse the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on EMS professionals in terms of their mental health. For this purpose, we present a descriptive crosssectional study with survey methodology. A total of 317 EMS workers (doctors, nurses, and emergency medical technicians) were recruited voluntarily. Psychological distress, post-traumatic stress disorder, and insomnia were assessed. The instruments were the General Health Questionnaire-12 (GHQ-12), the Davidson Trauma Scale (DTS-8), and the Athens Insomnia Scale (AIS-8). We found that 36% of respondents had psychological distress, 30.9% potentially had PTSD, and 60.9% experienced insomnia. Years of work experience were found to be positively correlated, albeit with low effect, with the PTSD score (r = 0.133). Finally, it can be stated that the COVID-19 pandemic has been a traumatic event for EMS workers. The number of professionals presenting psychological distress, possible PTSD, or insomnia increased dramatically during the early phases of the pandemic. This study highlights the need for mental health disorder prevention programmes for EMS workers in the face of a pandemic.

MARIA JOSE DE DIOS DUARTEMARIA JOSE DE DIOS DUARTE
MARIA JOSE DE DIOS DUARTE
Andres Arias AstrayAndres Arias Astray
Andres Arias Astray
CDCarlos Durántez
Carlos Durántez
VMVirtudes Niño Martín
Virtudes Niño Martín
Elena OleaElena Olea
Elena Olea
Ana Barrón López de RodaAna Barrón López de Roda
Ana Barrón López de Roda
(1) Background: The aim of this study was to explore the role of perceived stress and the health locus of control in Crohn’s disease and their influence upon the development of flare-ups of this disease. (2) Methods: Stress and the external locus of control were evaluated in a sample of 64 Crohn’s patients (flare-up phase versus latency phase). The perceived stress scale (PSS-14) and the multidimensional health locus of control scale were the measurement instruments used. (3) Results: The results indicate that the patients have high stress levels during a flare-up (26.13; 27.44; 28.79; 29.67); high stress levels (28.07; 29.67; 27.44; 28.07) if they have a high external locus of control; and that the external locus of control and stress levels have a significant influence upon the existence of flare-ups in those patients with low external locus of control levels (χ2 = 11.127; df = 1: p < 0.001). (4) Conclusions: Actions aimed at reducing stress and external locus of control levels are necessary in Crohn’s disease.

27 November 2021 in Journal of Clinical Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Raul Soto-CamaraRaul Soto-Camara
Raul Soto-Camara
NGNoemí García-Santa-Basilia
Noemí García-Santa-Basilia
HOHenar Onrubia-Baticón
Henar Onrubia-Baticón
Rosa M Cárdaba-GarcíaRosa M Cárdaba-García
Rosa M Cárdaba-García
JJJosé Julio Jiménez-Alegre
José Julio Jiménez-Alegre
SNSusana Navalpotro-Pascual
Susana Navalpotro-Pascual
Health professionals (HPs), especially those working in the front line, have been one of the groups most affected by the COVID-19 pandemic. The objective of this study is to identify the best available scientific evidence on the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the mental health of out-of-hospital HPs in terms of stress, anxiety, depression, and self-efficacy. A living systematic review of the literature was designed, consulting the electronic online versions of the CINHAL, Cochrane Library, Cuiden, IBECS, JBI, LILACS, Medline PyscoDoc, PsycoINFO, Scopus, and Web of Science databases in November 2021. Original research was selected, published in either English, Spanish, French, Italian, or Portuguese. In total, 2082 publications were identified, of which 16 were included in this review. The mental health of out-of-hospital HPs was affected. Being a woman or having direct contact with patients showing suspicious signs of COVID-19 or confirmed cases were the factors related to a greater risk of developing high levels of stress and anxiety; in the case of depressive symptoms, it was having a clinical history of illnesses that could weaken their defenses against infection. Stopping unpleasant emotions and thoughts was the coping strategy most frequently used by these HPs.

Rosa M Cárdaba-GarcíaRosa M Cárdaba-García
Rosa M Cárdaba-García
LPLucia Pérez Pérez
Lucia Pérez Pérez
VMVirtudes Niño Martín
Virtudes Niño Martín
Inés Cárdaba GarcíaInés Cárdaba García
Inés Cárdaba García
CDCarlos Durántez
Carlos Durántez
Elena OleaElena Olea
Elena Olea
(1) Background: The confinement of the population in response to the COVID-19 pandemic was related to an increased risk of suffering from anxiety and/or depression in previous studies with other populations. (2) Methods: descriptive study using surveys (Goldberg Anxiety and Depression Scale) with 808 participants over 18 years of age between 14 and 20 of May 2020 during the confinement due to the SARS-CoV-2 virus in Spain. (3) Results: 63% of the participants were at risk of suffering from anxiety and 64.9% were at risk of depression. Variables reaching statistical significance were: age (t anxiety = −0.139 and t depression = −0.153), gender (t anxiety = −4.152 and t depression = −4.178), marital status (anxiety F = 2.893 and depression F = 3.011), symptoms compatible with COVID-19 (t anxiety = −4.177 and t depression = −3.791), previous need for psychological help (t anxiety = −5.385 and t depression = −7.136) and need for such help at the time of the study (t anxiety = −9.144 and depression = −10.995). In addition, we generated two regression models that estimate the risk of anxiety and depression. (4) Conclusions: more than half of the participants were at risk of suffering from anxiety and/or depression, confirming the negative effect of confinement on the population.

15 April 2022 in Journal of Clinical Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Raul Soto-CamaraRaul Soto-Camara
Raul Soto-Camara
SNSusana Navalpotro-Pascual
Susana Navalpotro-Pascual
JJJosé Julio Jiménez-Alegre
José Julio Jiménez-Alegre
NGNoemí García-Santa-Basilia
Noemí García-Santa-Basilia
HOHenar Onrubia-Baticón
Henar Onrubia-Baticón
OGon behalf of the IMPSYCOVID-19 Study Group
on behalf of the IMPSYCOVID-19 Study Group
This study aimed to analyze the psychological affectation of health professionals (HPs) of Spanish Emergency Medical Services (EMSs) according to the cumulative incidence (CI) of COVID-19 cases in the regions in which they worked. A cross-sectional descriptive study was designed, including all HPs working in any EMS of the Spanish geography between 1 February 2021 and 30 April 2021. Their level of stress, anxiety and depression (DASS-21) and the perception of self-efficacy (G-SES) were the study’s main results. A 2-factor analysis of covariance was used to determine if the CI regions of COVID-19 cases determined the psychological impact on each of the studied variables. A total of 1710 HPs were included. A third presented psychological impairment classified as severe. The interaction of CI regions with the studied variables did not influence their levels of stress, anxiety, depression or self-efficacy. Women, younger HPs or those with less EMS work experience, emergency medical technicians (EMT), workers who had to modify their working conditions or those who lived with minors or dependents suffered a greater impact from the COVID-19 pandemic in certain regions. These HPs have shown high levels of stress, anxiety, depression and medium levels of self-efficacy, with similar data in the different geographical areas. Psychological support is essential to mitigate their suffering and teach them to react to adverse events.

29 March 2024 in Healthcare
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
PGPaula Villarreal Granda
Paula Villarreal Granda
ARAmada Recio-Platero
Amada Recio-Platero
YBYara Martin Bayo
Yara Martin Bayo
CDCarlos Durántez
Carlos Durántez
Rosa M Cárdaba-GarcíaRosa M Cárdaba-García
Rosa M Cárdaba-García
VVVERONICA VELASCO-GONZALEZ
VERONICA VELASCO-GONZALEZ
(1) Background: The role of the nurse case manager is unknown to the population. The main objective is to analyze the existing differences within the national territory in order to make known the situation in Spain with a view to the recognition of its functions and the creation of the professional profile in an equal manner. (2) Methods: A scoping review was conducted in order to achieve the main aim. Selected articles were subjected to a critical reading, and the levels of evidence and grades of recommendation of the Joanna Briggs Institute were verified. The search field was limited to the last ten years. (3) Results: Case management models are heterogeneous in different autonomous communities in Spain. Case nurse management is qualified for high-complexity patients, follow up on chronic patients, and coordinate health assistance. (4) Conclusions: It concludes that nursing’s role is crucial in the field of case management, being required in the follow-up of chronic patients of high complexity. Despite the proven health benefits, efficacy, and efficiency of case management, there are many heterogeneous models that coexist in Spain. This involves a restriction in the development of a nursing career because of the lack of a definition of its functions and competences.