Antonio Voza

Dr. Antonio Voza

Humanitas Research Hospital, IRCCS
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

13Years (2014-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MCMaurizio Cecconi
Maurizio Cecconi
DPDaniele Piovani
Daniele Piovani
EBEnrico Brunetta
Enrico Brunetta
AAAlessio Aghemo
Alessio Aghemo
MGMassimiliano Greco
Massimiliano Greco
Stefanos BonovasStefanos Bonovas
Stefanos Bonovas
We described features of hospitalized Covid-19 patients and identified predictors of clinical deterioration. We included patients consecutively admitted at Humanitas Research Hospital (Rozzano, Milan, Italy); retrospectively extracted demographic; clinical; laboratory and imaging findings at admission; used survival methods to identify factors associated with clinical deterioration (defined as intensive care unit (ICU) transfer or death), and developed a prognostic index. Overall; we analyzed 239 patients (29.3% females) with a mean age of 63.9 (standard deviation [SD]; 14.0) years. Clinical deterioration occurred in 70 patients (29.3%), including 41 (17.2%) ICU transfers and 36 (15.1%) deaths. The most common symptoms and signs at admission were cough (77.8%) and elevated respiratory rate (34.1%), while 66.5% of patients had at least one coexisting medical condition. Imaging frequently revealed ground-glass opacity (68.9%) and consolidation (23.8%). Age; increased respiratory rate; abnormal blood gas parameters and imaging findings; coexisting coronary heart disease; leukocytosis; lymphocytopenia; and several laboratory parameters (elevated procalcitonin; interleukin-6; serum ferritin; C-reactive protein; aspartate aminotransferase; lactate dehydrogenase; creatinine; fibrinogen; troponin-I; and D-dimer) were significant predictors of clinical deterioration. We suggested a prognostic index to assist risk-stratification (C-statistic; 0.845; 95% CI; 0.802–0.887). These results could aid early identification and management of patients at risk, who should therefore receive additional monitoring and aggressive supportive care.

Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ARAlessandro Riccardi
Alessandro Riccardi
MGmario guarino
mario guarino
SSSossio Serra
Sossio Serra
MSMichele Domenico Spampinato
Michele Domenico Spampinato
SVSimone Vanni
Simone Vanni
FIFabio De Iaco
Fabio De Iaco
Pain is the leading cause of medical consultations and occurs in 50–70% of emergency department visits. To date, several drugs have been used to manage pain. The clinical use of ketamine began in the 1960s and it immediately emerged as a manageable and safe drug for sedation and anesthesia. The analgesic properties of this drug were first reported shortly after its use; however, its psychomimetic effects have limited its use in emergency departments. Owing to the misuse and abuse of opioids in some countries worldwide, ketamine has become a versatile tool for sedation and analgesia. In this narrative review, ketamine’s role as an analgesic is discussed, with both known and new applications in various contexts (acute, chronic, and neuropathic pain), along with its strengths and weaknesses, especially in terms of psychomimetic, cardiovascular, and hepatic effects. Moreover, new scientific evidence has been reviewed on the use of additional drugs with ketamine, such as magnesium infusion for improving analgesia and clonidine for treating psychomimetic symptoms. Finally, this narrative review was refined by the experience of the Pain Group of the Italian Society of Emergency Medicine (SIMEU) in treating acute and chronic pain with acute manifestations in Italian Emergency Departments.

Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Andrea FabbriAndrea Fabbri
Andrea Fabbri
Antonio VozaAntonio Voza
Antonio Voza
ARAlessandro Riccardi
Alessandro Riccardi
SSSossio Serra
Sossio Serra
FIFabio De Iaco
Fabio De Iaco
The vast majority of injured patients suffer from pain. Systematic assessment of pain on admission to the emergency department (ED) is a cornerstone of translating the best treatment strategies for patient care into practice. Pain must be measured with severity scales that are validated in clinical practice, including for specific populations (such as children and older adults). Although primary care ED of trauma patients focuses on resuscitation, diagnosis and treatment, pain assessment and management remains a critical element as professionals are not prepared to provide effective and early therapy. To date, most EDs have pain assessment and management protocols that take into account the patient’s hemodynamic status and clinical condition and give preference to non-pharmacological approaches where possible. When selecting medications, the focus is on those that are least disruptive to hemodynamic status. Pain relief may still be necessary in hemodynamically unstable patients, but caution should be exercised, especially when using opioids, as absorption may be impaired or shock may be exacerbated. The analgesic dose of ketamine is certainly an attractive option. Fentanyl is clearly superior to other opioids in initial resuscitation and treatment as it has minimal effects on hemodynamic status and does not cause central nervous system depression. Inhaled analgesia techniques and ultrasound-guided nerve blocks are also increasingly effective solutions. A multimodal pain approach, which involves the use of two or more drugs with different mechanisms of action, plays an important role in the relief of trauma pain. All EDs must have policies and promote the adoption of procedures that use multimodal strategies for effective pain management in all injured patients.

12 October 2024 in Journal of Clinical Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Andrea PiccioniAndrea Piccioni
Andrea Piccioni
FSFabio Spagnuolo
Fabio Spagnuolo
Marcello CandelliMarcello Candelli
Marcello Candelli
Antonio VozaAntonio Voza
Antonio Voza
Marcello CovinoMarcello Covino
Marcello Covino
FFFrancesco Franceschi
Francesco Franceschi
Sepsis is a complex clinical syndrome characterized by an uncontrolled inflammatory response to an infection that may result in septic shock and death. Recent research has revealed a crucial link between sepsis and alterations in the gut microbiota, showing that the microbiome could serve an essential function in its pathogenesis and prognosis. In sepsis, the gut microbiota undergoes significant dysbiosis, transitioning from a beneficial commensal flora to a predominance of pathobionts. This transformation can lead to a dysfunction of the intestinal barrier, compromising the host’s immune response, which contributes to the severity of the disease. The gut microbiota is an intricate system of protozoa, fungi, bacteria, and viruses that are essential for maintaining immunity and metabolic balance. In sepsis, there is a reduction in microbial heterogeneity and a predominance of pathogenic bacteria, such as proteobacteria, which can exacerbate inflammation and negatively influence clinical outcomes. Microbial compounds, such as short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs), perform a crucial task in modulating the inflammatory response and maintaining intestinal barrier function. However, the role of other microbiota components, such as viruses and fungi, in sepsis remains unclear. Innovative therapeutic strategies aim to modulate the gut microbiota to improve the management of sepsis. These include selective digestive decontamination (SDD), probiotics, prebiotics, synbiotics, postbiotics, and fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT), all of which have shown potential, although variable, results. The future of sepsis management could benefit greatly from personalized treatment based on the microbiota. Rapid and easy-to-implement tests to assess microbiome profiles and metabolites associated with sepsis could revolutionize the disease’s diagnosis and management. These approaches could not only improve patient prognosis but also reduce dependence on antibiotic therapies and promote more targeted and sustainable treatment strategies. Nevertheless, there is still limited clarity regarding the ideal composition of the microbiota, which should be further characterized in the near future. Similarly, the benefits of therapeutic approaches should be validated through additional studies.

Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MOMartina Oriano
Martina Oriano
FAFrancesco Amati
Francesco Amati
AGAndrea Gramegna
Andrea Gramegna
ASAnthony De Soyza
Anthony De Soyza
MMMarco Mantero
Marco Mantero
SAStefano Aliberti
Stefano Aliberti
Airway inflammation plays a central role in bronchiectasis. Protease–antiprotease balance is crucial in bronchiectasis pathophysiology and increased presence of unopposed proteases activity may contribute to bronchiectasis onset and progression. Proteases’ over-reactivity and antiprotease deficiency may have a role in increasing inflammation in bronchiectasis airways and may lead to extracellular matrix degradation and tissue damage. Imbalances in serine proteases and matrix-metallo proteinases (MMPs) have been associated to bronchiectasis. Active neutrophil elastase has been associated with disease severity and poor long-term outcomes in this disease. Moreover, high levels of MMPs have been associated with radiological and disease severity. Finally, severe deficiency of α1-antitrypsin (AAT), as PiSZ and PiZZ (proteinase inhibitor SZ and ZZ) phenotype, have been associated with bronchiectasis development. Several treatments are under study to reduce protease activity in lungs. Molecules to inhibit neutrophil elastase activity have been developed in both oral or inhaled form, along with compounds inhibiting dipeptydil-peptidase 1, enzyme responsible for the activation of serine proteases. Finally, supplementation with AAT is in use for patients with severe deficiency. The identification of different targets of therapy within the protease–antiprotease balance contributes to a precision medicine approach in bronchiectasis and eventually interrupts and disrupts the vicious vortex which characterizes the disease.

20 April 2023 in European Respiratory Journal
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
FSFrancesco Salton
Francesco Salton
PCPaola Confalonieri
Paola Confalonieri
SCStefano Centanni
Stefano Centanni
MMMichele Mondoni
Michele Mondoni
Nicola PetrosilloNicola Petrosillo
Nicola Petrosillo
Marco ConfalonieriMarco Confalonieri
Marco Confalonieri
Background: Dysregulated systemic inflammation is the primary driver of mortality in severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pneumonia. Current guidelines favour a 7–10-day course of any glucocorticoid equivalent to dexamethasone 6 mg daily. A comparative randomised controlled trial (RCT) with a higher dose and a longer duration of intervention was lacking.Methods: We conducted a multicentre, open-label RCT to investigate methylprednisolone 80 mg as a continuous daily infusion for 8 days followed by slow taperingversusdexamethasone 6 mg once daily for up to 10 days in adult patients with COVID-19 pneumonia requiring oxygen or noninvasive respiratory support. The primary outcome was reduction in 28-day mortality. Secondary outcomes were mechanical ventilation-free days at 28 days, need for intensive care unit (ICU) referral, length of hospitalisation, need for tracheostomy, and changes in C-reactive protein (CRP) levels, arterial oxygen tension/inspiratory oxygen fraction (PaO2/FIO2) ratio and World Health Organization Clinical Progression Scale at days 3, 7 and 14.Results: 677 randomised patients were included. Findings are reported as methylprednisolone (n=337)versusdexamethasone (n=340). By day 28, there were no significant differences in mortality (35 (10.4%)versus41 (12.1%); p=0.49) nor in median mechanical ventilation-free days (median (interquartile range (IQR)) 23 (14)versus24 (16) days; p=0.49). ICU referral was necessary in 41 (12.2%)versus45 (13.2%) (p=0.68) and tracheostomy in 8 (2.4%)versus9 (2.6%) (p=0.82). Survivors in the methylprednisolone group required a longer median (IQR) hospitalisation (15 (11)versus14 (11) days; p=0.005) and experienced an improvement in CRP levels, but not inPaO2/FIO2ratio, at days 7 and 14. There were no differences in disease progression at the prespecified time-points.Conclusion: Prolonged, higher dose methylprednisolone did not reduce mortality at 28 days compared with conventional dexamethasone in COVID-19 pneumonia.