Bruno C. Odisio

Prof. Bruno C. Odisio

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

14Years (2013-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
7 February 2018 in European Radiology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
MCMarco Calandri
Marco Calandri
SYSuguru Yamashita
Suguru Yamashita
CGCarlo Gazzera
Carlo Gazzera
PFPaolo Fonio
Paolo Fonio
AVAndrea Veltri
Andrea Veltri
BOBruno C. Odisio
Bruno C. Odisio

1 April 2023 in Radiology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
YLYuan-Mao Lin
Yuan-Mao Lin
IPIwan Paolucci
Iwan Paolucci
COCaleb S. O’connor
Caleb S. O’connor
BABrian Mark Anderson
Brian Mark Anderson
BRBastien Rigaud
Bastien Rigaud
BOBruno C. Odisio
Bruno C. Odisio
Ablative margin quantified using biomechanical deformable CT image registration with artificial intelligence–based autosegmentation was strongly associated and spatially localized within local dise... Background Confirming ablation completeness with sufficient ablative margin is critical for local tumor control following colorectal liver metastasis (CLM) ablation. An image-based confirmation met...

13 March 2025 in The Lancet Gastroenterology & Hepatology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
BOBruno C. Odisio
Bruno C. Odisio
JAJessica Albuquerque
Jessica Albuquerque
YLYuan-Mao Lin
Yuan-Mao Lin
BABrian M Anderson
Brian M Anderson
COCaleb S O'COnnor
Caleb S O'COnnor
KBKristy K Brock
Kristy K Brock

4 August 2021 in Cancers
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
YLYuan-Mao Lin
Yuan-Mao Lin
IPIwan Paolucci
Iwan Paolucci
Kristy K BrockKristy K Brock
Kristy K Brock
BOBruno C. Odisio
Bruno C. Odisio
Image-guided ablation can provide effective local tumor control in selected patients with CLM. A randomized controlled trial suggested that radiofrequency ablation combined with systemic chemotherapy resulted in a survival benefit for patients with unresectable CLM, compared to systemic chemotherapy alone. For small tumors, ablation with adequate margins can be considered as an alternative to resection. The improvement of ablation technologies can allow the treatment of tumors close to major vascular structures or bile ducts, on which the applicability of thermal ablation modalities is challenging. Several factors affect the outcomes of ablation, including but not limited to tumor size, number, location, minimal ablation margin, RAS mutation status, prior hepatectomy, and extrahepatic disease. Further understanding of the impact of tumor biology and advanced imaging guidance on overall patient outcomes might help to tailor its application, and improve outcomes of image-guided ablation.

1 July 2015 in Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
BOBruno C. Odisio
Bruno C. Odisio
AAAaron Ashton
Aaron Ashton
YYYuanqing Yan
Yuanqing Yan
WWWei Wei
Wei Wei
AKAhmed Kaseb
Ahmed Kaseb
ATAlda L. Tam
Alda L. Tam

30 August 2024 in British Journal of Surgery
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
IPIwan Paolucci
Iwan Paolucci
JSJessica Albuquerque Marques Silva
Jessica Albuquerque Marques Silva
YLYuan-Mao Lin
Yuan-Mao Lin
GLGregor Laimer
Gregor Laimer
VCValentina Cignini
Valentina Cignini
BOBruno C. Odisio
Bruno C. Odisio
Background: Several ablation confirmation software methods for minimum ablative margin assessment have recently been developed to improve local outcomes for patients undergoing thermal ablation of colorectal liver metastases. Previous assessments were limited to single institutions mostly at the place of development. The aim of this study was to validate the previously identified 5 mm minimum ablative margin (A0) using autosegmentation and biomechanical deformable image registration in a multi-institutional setting. Methods: This was a multicentre, retrospective study including patients with colorectal liver metastases undergoing CT- or ultrasound-guided microwave or radiofrequency ablation during 2009–2022, reporting 3-year local disease progression (residual unablated tumour or local tumour progression) rates by minimum ablative margin across all institutions and identifying an intraprocedural contrast-enhanced CT-based minimum ablative margin associated with a 3-year local disease progression rate of less than 1%. Results: A total of 400 ablated colorectal liver metastases (median diameter of 1.5 cm) in 243 patients (145 men; median age of 62 [interquartile range 54–70] years) were evaluated, with a median follow-up of 26 (interquartile range 17–40) months. A total of 119 (48.9%) patients with 186 (46.5%) colorectal liver metastases were from international institutions B, C, and D that were not involved in the software development. Three-year local disease progression rates for 0 mm, >0 and <5 mm, and 5 mm or larger minimum ablative margins were 79%, 15%, and 0% respectively for institution A (where the software was developed) and 34%, 19%, and 2% respectively for institutions B, C, and D combined. Local disease progression risk decreased to less than 1% with an intraprocedurally confirmed minimum ablative margin greater than 4.6 mm. Conclusion: A minimum ablative margin of 5 mm or larger demonstrates optimal local oncological outcomes. It is proposed that an intraprocedural minimum ablative margin of 5 mm or larger, confirmed using biomechanical deformable image registration, serves as the A0 for colorectal liver metastasis thermal ablation.