Ablative margin quantified using biomechanical deformable CT image registration with artificial intelligence–based autosegmentation was strongly associated and spatially localized within local dise... Background Confirming ablation completeness with sufficient ablative margin is critical for local tumor control following colorectal liver metastasis (CLM) ablation. An image-based confirmation met...

Accurate clinical target volume (CTV) delineation is essential to ensure proper tumor coverage in radiation therapy. This is a particularly difficult task for head-and-neck cancer patients where detailed knowledge of the pathways of microscopic tumor spread is necessary. This paper proposes a solution to auto-segment these volumes in oropharyngeal cancer patients using a two-channel 3D U-Net architecture. The first channel feeds the network with the patient’s CT image providing anatomical context, whereas the second channel provides the network with tumor location and morphological information. Radiation therapy simulation computer tomography scans and their corresponding manually delineated CTV and gross tumor volume (GTV) delineations from 285 oropharyngeal patients previously treated at MD Anderson Cancer Center were used in this study. CTV and GTV delineations underwent rigorous group peer-review prior to the start of treatment delivery. The convolutional network’s parameters were fine-tuned using a training set of 210 patients using 3-fold cross-validation. During hyper-parameter selection, we use a score based on the overlap (dice similarity coefficient (DSC)) and missed volumes (false negative dice (FND)) to minimize any possible under-treatment. Three auto-delineated models were created to estimate tight, moderate, and wide CTV margin delineations. Predictions on our test set (75 patients) resulted in auto-delineations with high overlap and close surface distance agreement (DSC > 0.75 on 96% of cases for tight and moderate auto-delineation models and 97% of cases having mean surface distance ⩽ 5.0 mm) to the ground-truth. We found that applying a 5 mm uniform margin expansion to the auto-delineated CTVs would cover at least 90% of the physician CTV volumes for a large majority of patients; however, determination of appropriate margin expansions for auto-delineated CTVs merits further investigation.

The Radiation Planning Assistant (RPA) is a system developed for the fully automated creation of radiotherapy treatment plans, including volume-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) plans for patients with head/neck cancer and 4-field box plans for patients with cervical cancer. It is a combination of specially developed in-house software that uses an application programming interface to communicate with a commercial radiotherapy treatment planning system. It also interfaces with a commercial secondary dose verification software. The necessary inputs to the system are a Treatment Plan Order, approved by the radiation oncologist, and a simulation computed tomography (CT) image, approved by the radiographer. The RPA then generates a complete radiotherapy treatment plan. For the cervical cancer treatment plans, no additional user intervention is necessary until the plan is complete. For head/neck treatment plans, after the normal tissue and some of the target structures are automatically delineated on the CT image, the radiation oncologist must review the contours, making edits if necessary. They also delineate the gross tumor volume. The RPA then completes the treatment planning process, creating a VMAT plan. Finally, the completed plan must be reviewed by qualified clinical staff.

The deformable nature of the liver can make focal treatment challenging and is not adequately addressed with simple rigid registration techniques. More advanced registration techniques can take deformations into account (eg, biomechanical modeling) but require segmentations of the whole liver for each scan, which is a time-intensive process. We hypothesize that fully convolutional networks can be used to rapidly and accurately autosegment the liver, removing the temporal bottleneck for biomechanical modeling. Manual liver segmentations on computed tomography scans from 183 patients treated at our institution and 30 scans from the Medical Image Computing & Computer Assisted Intervention challenges were collected for this study. Three architectures were investigated for rapid automated segmentation of the liver (VGG-16, DeepLabv3 +, and a 3-dimensional UNet). Fifty-six cases were set aside as a final test set for quantitative model evaluation. Accuracy of the autosegmentations was assessed using Dice similarity coefficient and mean surface distance. Qualitative evaluation was also performed by 3 radiation oncologists on 50 independent cases with previously clinically treated liver contours. The mean (minimum-maximum) mean surface distance for the test groups with the final model, DeepLabv3 +, were as follows: μContrast(N = 17): 0.99 mm (0.47-2.2), μNon_Contrast(N = 19)l: 1.12 mm (0.41-2.87), and μMiccai(N = 30)t: 1.48 mm (0.82-3.96). The qualitative evaluation showed that 30 of 50 autosegmentations (60%) were preferred to manual contours (majority voting) in a blinded comparison, and 48 of 50 autosegmentations (96%) were deemed clinically acceptable by at least 1 reviewing physician. The autosegmentations were preferred compared with manually defined contours in the majority of cases. The ability to rapidly segment the liver with high accuracy achieved in this investigation has the potential to enable the efficient integration of biomechanical model-based registration into a clinical workflow.