The present review paper aims to document the latest developments on the applications of nanofluids as working fluid in parabolic trough collectors (PTCs). The influence of many factors such as nanoparticles and base fluid type as well as volume fraction and size of nanoparticles on the performance of PTCs has been investigated. The reviewed studies were mainly categorized into three different types of experimental, modeling (semi-analytical), and computational fluid dynamics (CFD). The main focus was to evaluate the effect of nanofluids on thermal efficiency, entropy generation, heat transfer coefficient enhancement, as well as pressure drop in PTCs. It was revealed that nanofluids not only enhance (in most of the cases) the thermal efficiency, convection heat transfer coefficient, and exergy efficiency of the system but also can decrease the entropy generation of the system. The only drawback in application of nanofluids in PTCs was found to be pressure drop increase that can be controlled by optimization in nanoparticles volume fraction and mass flow rate.

This work introduces a 0.6-scale water model of the continuous slab-casting process and a MATLAB-based model to study the effects of non-primed and multiphase flow on pressure and flow rate. The water model uses stopper-rod flow control and features pressure and velocity measurements at multiple locations. The new computational model, PFSR V4 (Pressure-drop Flow-rate model of Stopper Rod metal delivery systems, Version 4), improves upon a prior one-dimensional Bernoulli-based framework by incorporating a bubble accumulation zone. This zone represents a region of bubbly flow with an intermediate gas fraction between constant-pressure gas pockets below the stopper tip and the downstream bubbly flow regime. Parametric studies with the water model show that flow remains fully primed at low gas flow rates but transitions to non-primed flow as the gas flow rate exceeds 10–16 SLPM. Three different flow regions are observed inside the water model nozzle: air pocket, bubble accumulation, and bubbly flow, which are also captured by the new computational model. Above a critical gas flow rate, the flow becomes unstable and difficult to control, though higher hot gas flow rates are expected for similar transitions in a real steel caster due to gas expansion at high temperatures. Pressure changes are minimal in the air pocket region and increase significantly in the upper bubble accumulation zone, where liquid velocity is much higher than in the classic bubbly-flow region, found lower in the nozzle. The new model was successfully calibrated to match the observed flow regimes and shows good agreement with the water-model measurements.