Catherine Morgan

Dr. Catherine Morgan

University of Bristol, UK
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

28Years (1999-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
3 April 2020 in Journal of Parkinson’s Disease
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
CMCatherine Morgan
Catherine Morgan
MRMichal Rolinski
Michal Rolinski
RMRoisin Mcnaney
Roisin Mcnaney
BJBennet Jones
Bennet Jones
LRLynn Rochester
Lynn Rochester
AWAlan L. Whone
Alan L. Whone
Background: The emergence of new technologies measuring outcomes in Parkinson’s disease (PD) to complement the existing clinical rating scales has introduced the possibility of measurement occurring in patients’ own homes whilst they freely live and

20 December 2023 in Scientific Data
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
CMCatherine Morgan
Catherine Morgan
ETEmma Tonkin
Emma Tonkin
AMAlessandro Masullo
Alessandro Masullo
FJFerdian Jovan
Ferdian Jovan
ASArindam Sikdar
Arindam Sikdar
Ian James CraddockIan James Craddock
Ian James Craddock
Parkinson’s disease (PD) is a neurodegenerative disorder characterised by motor symptoms such as gait dysfunction and postural instability. Technological tools to continuously monitor outcomes could capture the hour-by-hour symptom fluctuations of PD. Development of such tools is hampered by the lack of labelled datasets from home settings. To this end, we propose REMAP (REal-world Mobility Activities in Parkinson’s disease), a human rater-labelled dataset collected in a home-like setting. It includes people with and without PD doing sit-to-stand transitions and turns in gait. These discrete activities are captured from periods of free-living (unobserved, unstructured) and during clinical assessments. The PD participants withheld their dopaminergic medications for a time (causing increased symptoms), so their activities are labelled as being “on” or “off” medications. Accelerometry from wrist-worn wearables and skeleton pose video data is included. We present an open dataset, where the data is coarsened to reduce re-identifiability, and a controlled dataset available on application which contains more refined data. A use-case for the data to estimate sit-to-stand speed and duration is illustrated.

11 December 2021 in Sensors
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
LPLuis Ramon Peraza
Luis Ramon Peraza
KKKirsi M. Kinnunen
Kirsi M. Kinnunen
RMRoisin Mcnaney
Roisin Mcnaney
Ian James CraddockIan James Craddock
Ian James Craddock
AWAlan L. Whone
Alan L. Whone
RWRobin Wolz
Robin Wolz
The use of wearable sensors allows continuous recordings of physical activity from participants in free-living or at-home clinical studies. The large amount of data collected demands automatic analysis pipelines to extract gait parameters that can be used as clinical endpoints. We introduce a deep learning-based automatic pipeline for wearables that processes tri-axial accelerometry data and extracts gait events—bout segmentation, initial contact (IC), and final contact (FC)—from a single sensor located at either the lower back (near L5), shin or wrist. The gait events detected are posteriorly used for gait parameter estimation, such as step time, length, and symmetry. We report results from a leave-one-subject-out (LOSO) validation on a pilot study dataset of five participants clinically diagnosed with Parkinson’s disease (PD) and six healthy controls (HC). Participants wore sensors at three body locations and walked on a pressure-sensing walkway to obtain reference gait data. Mean absolute errors (MAE) for the IC events ranged from 22.82 to 33.09 milliseconds (msecs) for the lower back sensor while for the shin and wrist sensors, MAE ranges were 28.56–64.66 and 40.19–72.50 msecs, respectively. For the FC-event detection, MAE ranges were 29.06–48.42, 40.19–72.70 and 36.06–60.18 msecs for the lumbar, wrist and shin sensors, respectively. Intraclass correlation coefficients, ICC(2,k), between the estimated parameters and the reference data resulted in good-to-excellent agreement (ICC ≥ 0.84) for the lumbar and shin sensors, excluding the double support time (ICC = 0.37 lumbar and 0.38 shin) and swing time (ICC = 0.55 lumbar and 0.59 shin). The wrist sensor also showed good agreements, but the ICCs were lower overall than for the other two sensors. Our proposed analysis pipeline has the potential to extract up to 100 gait-related parameters, and we expect our contribution will further support developments in the fields of wearable sensors, digital health, and remote monitoring in clinical trials.

16 June 2021 in Sensors
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
FHFarnoosh Heidarivincheh
Farnoosh Heidarivincheh
RMRyan McConville
Ryan McConville
CMCatherine Morgan
Catherine Morgan
RMRoisin Mcnaney
Roisin Mcnaney
AMAlessandro Masullo
Alessandro Masullo
Ian James CraddockIan James Craddock
Ian James Craddock
Parkinson’s disease (PD) is a chronic neurodegenerative condition that affects a patient’s everyday life. Authors have proposed that a machine learning and sensor-based approach that continuously monitors patients in naturalistic settings can provide constant evaluation of PD and objectively analyse its progression. In this paper, we make progress toward such PD evaluation by presenting a multimodal deep learning approach for discriminating between people with PD and without PD. Specifically, our proposed architecture, named MCPD-Net, uses two data modalities, acquired from vision and accelerometer sensors in a home environment to train variational autoencoder (VAE) models. These are modality-specific VAEs that predict effective representations of human movements to be fused and given to a classification module. During our end-to-end training, we minimise the difference between the latent spaces corresponding to the two data modalities. This makes our method capable of dealing with missing modalities during inference. We show that our proposed multimodal method outperforms unimodal and other multimodal approaches by an average increase in F1-score of 0.25 and 0.09, respectively, on a data set with real patients. We also show that our method still outperforms other approaches by an average increase in F1-score of 0.17 when a modality is missing during inference, demonstrating the benefit of training on multiple modalities.

30 November 2020 in BMJ Open
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
CMCatherine Morgan
Catherine Morgan
ICIan Craddock
Ian Craddock
ETEmma L Tonkin
Emma L Tonkin
KKKirsi M Kinnunen
Kirsi M Kinnunen
RMRoisin McNaney
Roisin McNaney
AWAlan L Whone
Alan L Whone
Introduction The impact of disease-modifying agents on disease progression in Parkinson’s disease is largely assessed in clinical trials using clinical rating scales. These scales have drawbacks in terms of their ability to capture the fluctuating nature of symptoms while living in a naturalistic environment. The SPHERE (Sensor Platform for HEalthcare in a Residential Environment) project has designed a multi-sensor platform with multimodal devices designed to allow continuous, relatively inexpensive, unobtrusive sensing of motor, non-motor and activities of daily living metrics in a home or a home-like environment. The aim of this study is to evaluate how the SPHERE technology can measure aspects of Parkinson’s disease. Methods and analysis This is a small-scale feasibility and acceptability study during which 12 pairs of participants (comprising a person with Parkinson’s and a healthy control participant) will stay and live freely for 5 days in a home-like environment embedded with SPHERE technology including environmental, appliance monitoring, wrist-worn accelerometry and camera sensors. These data will be collected alongside clinical rating scales, participant diary entries and expert clinician annotations of colour video images. Machine learning will be used to look for a signal to discriminate between Parkinson’s disease and control, and between Parkinson’s disease symptoms ‘on’ and ‘off’ medications. Additional outcome measures including bradykinesia, activity level, sleep parameters and some activities of daily living will be explored. Acceptability of the technology will be evaluated qualitatively using semi-structured interviews. Ethics and dissemination Ethical approval has been given to commence this study; the results will be disseminated as widely as appropriate.

14 August 2023 in Digital Biomarkers
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
CMCatherine Morgan
Catherine Morgan
AMAlessandro Masullo
Alessandro Masullo
MMMajid Mirmehdi
Majid Mirmehdi
HIHanna Kristiina Isotalus
Hanna Kristiina Isotalus
FJFerdian Jovan
Ferdian Jovan
ICIan Craddock
Ian Craddock
Introduction: Technology holds the potential to track disease progression and response to neuroprotective therapies in Parkinson’s disease (PD). The sit-to-stand (STS) transition is a frequently occurring event which is important to people with PD. The aim of this study was to demonstrate an automatic approach to quantify STS duration and speed using a real-world free-living dataset and look at clinical correlations of the outcomes, including whether STS parameters change when someone withholds PD medications. Methods: Eighty-five hours of video data were collected from 24 participants staying in pairs for 5-day periods in a naturalistic setting. Skeleton joints were extracted from the video data; the head trajectory was estimated and used to estimate the STS parameters of duration and speed. Results: 3.14 STS transitions were seen per hour per person on average. Significant correlations were seen between automatic and manual STS duration (Pearson rho − 0.419, p = 0.042) and between automatic STS speed and manual STS duration (Pearson rho − 0.780, p < 0.001). Significant and strong correlations were seen between the gold-standard clinical rating scale scores and both STS duration and STS speed; these correlations were not seen in the STS transitions when the participants were carrying something in their hand(s). Significant differences were seen at the cohort level between control and PD participants’ ON medications’ STS duration (U = 6,263, p = 0.018) and speed (U = 9,965, p < 0.001). At an individual level, only two participants with PD became significantly slower to STS when they were OFF medications; withholding medications did not significantly change STS duration at an individual level in any participant. Conclusion: We demonstrate a novel approach to automatically quantify and ecologically validate two STS parameters which correlate with gold-standard clinical tools measuring disease severity in PD.