Takashi Sasaki

Dr. Takashi Sasaki

Department of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Medicine, Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

18Years (2009-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
20 May 2014 in Digestive Diseases and Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
THTsuyoshi Hamada
Tsuyoshi Hamada
Hiroyuki IsayamaHiroyuki Isayama
Hiroyuki Isayama
YNYousuke Nakai
Yousuke Nakai
HKHirofumi Kogure
Hirofumi Kogure
NYNatsuyo Yamamoto
Natsuyo Yamamoto
KKKazuhiko Koike
Kazuhiko Koike

31 March 2021 in International Journal of Clinical Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
TTTsuyoshi Takeda
Tsuyoshi Takeda
TSTakashi Sasaki
Takashi Sasaki
CSChisaki Suzumori
Chisaki Suzumori
TMTakafumi Mie
Takafumi Mie
TFTakaaki Furukawa
Takaaki Furukawa
NSNaoki Sasahira
Naoki Sasahira

1 January 2009 in Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
TSTakashi Sasaki
Takashi Sasaki
HIHiroyuki Isayama
Hiroyuki Isayama
YYYoko Yashima
Yoko Yashima
HYHiroshi Yagioka
Hiroshi Yagioka
HKHirofumi Kogure
Hirofumi Kogure
MOMasao Omata
Masao Omata
Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of single-agent S-1 in patients with advanced biliary tract cancer. Methods: S-1 was administered orally at a dose of 80 mg/m2 for 28 days, followed by 14 days of rest (1 cycle); treatment was repeated until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or patient refusal. Results: Forty-five patients were enrolled between January 2005 and June 2008. Among these, 29 patients received S-1 as first-line chemotherapy and 16 patients received S-1 as second-line chemotherapy. The response rates for first- and second-line chemotherapy were 17.2 and 18.8%, respectively. The median times to progression for the first- and second-line chemotherapy groups were 4.2 and 5.5 months (p = 0.91), respectively. The median overall survival and 1-year survival rate for each group were 8.7 and 8.0 months and 42.2 and 38.2%, respectively (p = 0.62). Only the first-line chemotherapy group experienced grade 3/4 toxicities, including leukopenia (6.9%), neutropenia (10.3%), anemia (6.9%), thrombocytopenia (10.3%) and total bilirubin elevation (3.4%). Conclusion: S-1 monotherapy is a feasible and moderately efficacious treatment for advanced biliary tract cancer, as a first- or second-line chemotherapy regimen.

Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
TSTakashi Sasaki
Takashi Sasaki
TTTsuyoshi Takeda
Tsuyoshi Takeda
TOTakeshi Okamoto
Takeshi Okamoto
MOMasato Ozaka
Masato Ozaka
NSNaoki Sasahira
Naoki Sasahira
Biliary tract cancer refers to a group of malignancies including cholangiocarcinoma, gallbladder cancer, and ampullary cancer. While surgical resection is considered the only curative treatment, postoperative recurrence can sometimes occur. Adjuvant chemotherapy is used to prolong prognosis in some cases. Many unresectable cases are also treated with chemotherapy. Therefore, systemic chemotherapy is widely introduced for the treatment of biliary tract cancer. Evidence on chemotherapy for biliary tract cancer is recently on the increase. Combination chemotherapy with gemcitabine and cisplatin is currently the standard of care for first-line chemotherapy in advanced cases. Recently, FOLFOX also demonstrated efficacy as a second-line treatment. In addition, efficacies of isocitrate dehydrogenase inhibitors and fibroblast growth factor receptor inhibitors have been shown. In the adjuvant setting, capecitabine monotherapy has become the standard of care in Western countries. In addition to conventional cytotoxic agents, molecular-targeted agents and immunotherapy have been evaluated in multiple clinical trials. Genetic testing is used to check for genetic alterations and molecular-targeted agents and immunotherapy are introduced based on tumor characteristics. In this article, we review the latest evidence of chemotherapy for biliary tract cancer.

1 June 2022 in Journal of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
TTTsuyoshi Takeda
Tsuyoshi Takeda
TSTakashi Sasaki
Takashi Sasaki
TOTakeshi Okamoto
Takeshi Okamoto
AKAkiyoshi Kasuga
Akiyoshi Kasuga
MMMasato Matsuyama
Masato Matsuyama
NSNaoki Sasahira
Naoki Sasahira

Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
AKAkiyoshi Kasuga
Akiyoshi Kasuga
TOTakeshi Okamoto
Takeshi Okamoto
USudagawa shohei
udagawa shohei
CMChinatsu Mori
Chinatsu Mori
TMTakafumi Mie
Takafumi Mie
NSNaoki Sasahira
Naoki Sasahira
Hereditary pancreatic cancers are caused by several inherited genes. Familial pancreatic cancer is defined as pancreatic cancer arising in a patient with at least two first-degree relatives with pancreatic cancer in the absence of an identified genetic cause. Hereditary pancreatic cancer syndromes and familial pancreatic cancers account for about 10% of pancreatic cancer cases. Germline mutations in BRCA1, BRCA2, ATM, PALB2, CDKN2A, STK11, and TP53 and mismatch repair genes (MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, PMS2, and EPCAM) are among the well-known inherited susceptibility genes. Currently available targeted medications include poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARP) for cases with mutant BRCA and immune checkpoint inhibitors for cases with mismatch repair deficiency. Loss of heterozygosity of hereditary pancreatic cancer susceptibility genes such as BRCA1/2 plays a key role in carcinogenesis and sensitivity to PARP inhibitors. Signature 3 identified by whole genome sequencing is also associated with homologous recombination deficiency and sensitivity to targeted therapies. In this review, we summarize molecular features and treatments of hereditary pancreatic cancer syndromes and surveillance procedures for unaffected high-risk cases. We also review transgenic murine models to gain a better understanding of carcinogenesis in hereditary pancreatic cancer.