Naoki Sasahira

Dr. Naoki Sasahira

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

20Years (2007-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
27 December 2022 in European Journal of Cancer
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
MOMasato Ozaka
Masato Ozaka
KNKohei Nakachi
Kohei Nakachi
SKSatoshi Kobayashi
Satoshi Kobayashi
AOAkihiro Ohba
Akihiro Ohba
HIHiroshi Imaoka
Hiroshi Imaoka
JFJunji Furuse
Junji Furuse
We compared the efficacy of modified 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, irinotecan, and oxaliplatin (mFOLFIRINOX) with that of gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel (GnP) for locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC). Patients with untreated LAPC were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive mFOLFIRINOX or GnP. One-year overall survival (OS) was the primary endpoint. The major secondary end-points included progression-free survival (PFS), response rate (RR), carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9) response, and adverse events. The sample size was 124 patients to select a more effective regimen with a minimum probability of 0.85 and to examine the null hypothesis of the 1-year OS <53%. Of the 126 patients enrolled from 29 institutions, 125 were deemed eligible. The 1-year OS was 77.4% (95% CI, 64.9-86.0) and 82.5% (95% CI, 70.7-89.9) in the mFOLFIRINOX and GnP arms, respectively. The median PFS was 11.2 (95% CI, 9.9-15.9) and 9.4 months (95% CI, 7.4-12.8) in the mFOLFIRINOX and GnP arms, respectively. The RR and CA19-9 response rate were 30.9% (95% CI, 19.1-44.8) and 57.1% (95% CI, 41.0-72.3) and 42.1% (95% CI 29.1-55.9) and 85.0% (95% CI, 70.2-94.3) in the mFOLFIRINOX and GnP arms, respectively. Grade 3-4 diarrhoea and anorexia were predominant in the mFOLFIRINOX arm. GnP was considered the candidate for a subsequent phase III trial because of its better RR, CA19-9 response, and mild gastrointestinal toxicities. Both regimens displayed higher efficacy in the 1-year survival than in the historical data of gemcitabine monotherapy.

31 March 2021 in International Journal of Clinical Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
TTTsuyoshi Takeda
Tsuyoshi Takeda
TSTakashi Sasaki
Takashi Sasaki
CSChisaki Suzumori
Chisaki Suzumori
TMTakafumi Mie
Takafumi Mie
TFTakaaki Furukawa
Takaaki Furukawa
NSNaoki Sasahira
Naoki Sasahira

Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
TSTakashi Sasaki
Takashi Sasaki
TTTsuyoshi Takeda
Tsuyoshi Takeda
TOTakeshi Okamoto
Takeshi Okamoto
MOMasato Ozaka
Masato Ozaka
NSNaoki Sasahira
Naoki Sasahira
Biliary tract cancer refers to a group of malignancies including cholangiocarcinoma, gallbladder cancer, and ampullary cancer. While surgical resection is considered the only curative treatment, postoperative recurrence can sometimes occur. Adjuvant chemotherapy is used to prolong prognosis in some cases. Many unresectable cases are also treated with chemotherapy. Therefore, systemic chemotherapy is widely introduced for the treatment of biliary tract cancer. Evidence on chemotherapy for biliary tract cancer is recently on the increase. Combination chemotherapy with gemcitabine and cisplatin is currently the standard of care for first-line chemotherapy in advanced cases. Recently, FOLFOX also demonstrated efficacy as a second-line treatment. In addition, efficacies of isocitrate dehydrogenase inhibitors and fibroblast growth factor receptor inhibitors have been shown. In the adjuvant setting, capecitabine monotherapy has become the standard of care in Western countries. In addition to conventional cytotoxic agents, molecular-targeted agents and immunotherapy have been evaluated in multiple clinical trials. Genetic testing is used to check for genetic alterations and molecular-targeted agents and immunotherapy are introduced based on tumor characteristics. In this article, we review the latest evidence of chemotherapy for biliary tract cancer.

Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
AKAkiyoshi Kasuga
Akiyoshi Kasuga
TOTakeshi Okamoto
Takeshi Okamoto
USudagawa shohei
udagawa shohei
CMChinatsu Mori
Chinatsu Mori
TMTakafumi Mie
Takafumi Mie
NSNaoki Sasahira
Naoki Sasahira
Hereditary pancreatic cancers are caused by several inherited genes. Familial pancreatic cancer is defined as pancreatic cancer arising in a patient with at least two first-degree relatives with pancreatic cancer in the absence of an identified genetic cause. Hereditary pancreatic cancer syndromes and familial pancreatic cancers account for about 10% of pancreatic cancer cases. Germline mutations in BRCA1, BRCA2, ATM, PALB2, CDKN2A, STK11, and TP53 and mismatch repair genes (MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, PMS2, and EPCAM) are among the well-known inherited susceptibility genes. Currently available targeted medications include poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARP) for cases with mutant BRCA and immune checkpoint inhibitors for cases with mismatch repair deficiency. Loss of heterozygosity of hereditary pancreatic cancer susceptibility genes such as BRCA1/2 plays a key role in carcinogenesis and sensitivity to PARP inhibitors. Signature 3 identified by whole genome sequencing is also associated with homologous recombination deficiency and sensitivity to targeted therapies. In this review, we summarize molecular features and treatments of hereditary pancreatic cancer syndromes and surveillance procedures for unaffected high-risk cases. We also review transgenic murine models to gain a better understanding of carcinogenesis in hereditary pancreatic cancer.

1 November 2025 in Journal of Clinical Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
AOAkihiro Ohba
Akihiro Ohba
MOMasato Ozaka
Masato Ozaka
JMJunki Mizusawa
Junki Mizusawa
Takuji OkusakaTakuji Okusaka
Takuji Okusaka
SKSatoshi Kobayashi
Satoshi Kobayashi
H(Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Oncology Group of the Japan Clinical Oncology Group (JCOG-HBPOG)
Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Oncology Group of the Japan Clinical Oncology Group (JCOG-HBPOG)
PURPOSE: Modified fluorouracil, leucovorin, irinotecan, and oxaliplatin (mFOLFIRINOX) and nab-paclitaxel + gemcitabine are recommended as first-line treatments for metastatic pancreatic cancer. S-1, irinotecan, and oxaliplatin (S-IROX) demonstrated activity in a phase Ib trial in this population. Therefore, these three regimens were directly compared. METHODS: This randomized phase II/III trial was performed at 45 centers in Japan. Eligible patients age 20-75 years with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1 and pathologically confirmed metastatic or recurrent pancreatic cancer were randomly assigned (1:1:1) to receive mFOLFIRINOX (oxaliplatin 85 mg/m 2 over 2 hours, irinotecan 150 mg/m 2 over 90 minutes, l-leucovorin 200 mg/m 2 over 2 hours, each once daily on day 1, and fluorouracil 2,400 mg/m 2 over 46 hours on days 1-3, every 2 weeks), S-IROX (oxaliplatin 85 mg/m 2 over 2 hours, irinotecan 150 mg/m 2 over 90 minutes on day 1, and S-1 80 mg/m 2 /day administered orally twice daily on days 1-7, every 2 weeks), or nab-paclitaxel (125 mg/m 2 ) + gemcitabine (1,000 mg/m 2 ) on days 1, 8, and 15 every 4 weeks. The primary end point was overall survival (OS). RESULTS: A total of 527 patients were enrolled, with 426 included in the planned interim analysis. The median OS was 14.0 months (hazard ratio [HR], 1.31 [95% CI, 0.97 to 1.77]) and 13.6 months (HR, 1.35 [95% CI, 1.00 to 1.82]) in the mFOLFIRINOX and S-IROX groups, respectively, as compared with 17.1 months in the nab-paclitaxel + gemcitabine group. The predictive probability of achieving superiority in the final analysis was <1% in both groups. Thus, the trial was terminated owing to its futility. Grade 3 to 4 anorexia was more frequent in the mFOLFIRINOX (23.3%) and S-IROX (27.5%) groups than in the nab-paclitaxel + gemcitabine group (5.0%). CONCLUSION: Neither mFOLFIRINOX nor S-IROX appeared to be superior compared with nab-paclitaxel + gemcitabine as the first-line treatment for metastatic or recurrent pancreatic cancer.