Alessandra Anna Prete

Dr. Alessandra Anna Prete

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

14Years (2013-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
24 August 2016 in Scientific Reports
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
CNChiara Nicolazzo
Chiara Nicolazzo
CRCristina Raimondi
Cristina Raimondi
MMMariaLaura Mancini
MariaLaura Mancini
SCSalvatore Caponnetto
Salvatore Caponnetto
AGAngela Gradilone
Angela Gradilone
PGPaola Gazzaniga
Paola Gazzaniga
Controversial results on the predictive value of programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) status in lung tumor tissue for response to immune checkpoint inhibitors do not allow for any conclusive consideration. Liquid biopsy might allow real-time sampling of patients for PD-L1 through the course of the disease. Twenty-four stage IV NSCLC patients included in the Expanded Access Program with Nivolumab were enrolled. Circulating tumor cells (CTCs) were analyzed by CellSearch with anti-human B7-H1/PD-L1 PE-conjugated antibody. PD-L1 expressing CTCs were assessed at baseline, at 3 and 6 months after starting therapy, and correlated with outcome. At baseline and at 3 months of treatment, the presence of CTCs and the expression of PD-L1 on their surface were found associated to poor patients outcome. Nevertheless, the high frequency of PD-L1 expressing CTCs hampered to discriminate the role of PD-L1 in defining prognosis. Conversely although CTCs were found in all patients 6 months after treatment, at this time patients could be dichotomized into two groups based PD-L1 expression on CTCs. Patients with PD-L1 negative CTCs all obtained a clinical benefit, while patients with PD-L1 (+) CTCs all experienced progressive disease. This suggests that the persistence of PD-L1(+) CTCs might mirror a mechanism of therapy escape.

1 June 2021 in European Journal of Cancer
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
FCFrancesca Corti
Francesca Corti
SLSara Lonardi
Sara Lonardi
RIRossana Intini
Rossana Intini
MSMassimiliano Salati
Massimiliano Salati
EFElisabetta Fenocchio
Elisabetta Fenocchio
FPFilippo Pietrantonio
Filippo Pietrantonio

3 July 2017 in BioMed Research International
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
LPLetizia Procaccio
Letizia Procaccio
MSMarta Schirripa
Marta Schirripa
Matteo FassanMatteo Fassan
Matteo Fassan
LVLoredana Vecchione
Loredana Vecchione
FBFrancesca Bergamo
Francesca Bergamo
SLSara Lonardi
Sara Lonardi
Gastrointestinal cancers represent a major public health problem worldwide. Immunotherapeutic strategies are currently under investigation in this setting and preliminary results of ongoing trials adopting checkpoint inhibitors are striking. Indeed, although a poor immunogenicity for GI has been reported, a strong biological rationale supports the development of immunotherapy in this field. The clinical and translational research on immunotherapy for the treatment of GI cancers started firstly with the identification of immune-related mechanisms possibly relevant to GI tumours and secondly with the development of immunotherapy-based agents in clinical trials. In the present review a general overview is firstly provided followed by a focus on major findings on gastric, colorectal, and hepatocellular carcinomas. Finally, pathological and molecular perspectives are provided since many efforts are ongoing in order to identify possible predictive biomarkers and to improve patients’ selection. Many issues are still unsolved in this field; however, we strongly believe that immunotherapy might positively affect the natural history of a subgroup of GI cancer patients improving outcome and the overall quality of life.

1 April 2019 in Cancer Management and Research
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
AGAndrea Casadei gardini
Andrea Casadei gardini
FMFrancesco Montagnani
Francesco Montagnani
CCChiara Casadei
Chiara Casadei
FAFrancesca Arcadipane
Francesca Arcadipane
KAKalliopi Andrikou
Kalliopi Andrikou
Pierfrancesco FrancoPierfrancesco Franco
Pierfrancesco Franco
Background: In anal cancer, there are no markers nor other laboratory indexes that can predict prognosis and guide clinical practice for patients treated with concurrent chemoradiation. In this study, we retrospectively investigated the influence of immune inflammation indicators on treatment outcome of anal cancer patients undergoing concurrent chemoradiotherapy. Methods: All patients had a histologically proven diagnosis of squamous cell carcinoma of the anal canal/margin treated with chemoradiotherapy according to the Nigro’s regimen. Impact on prognosis of pre-treatment systemic index of inflammation (SII) (platelet x neutrophil/lymphocyte), neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) were analyzed. Results: A total of 161 consecutive patients were available for the analysis. Response to treatment was the single most important factor for progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). At univariate analysis, higher SII level was significantly correlated to lower PFS (p<0.01) and OS (p=0.046). NLR level was significantly correlated to PFS (p=0.05), but not to OS (p=0.06). PLR level significantly affected both PFS (p<0.01) and OS (p=0.02). On multivariate analysis pre-treatment, SII level was significantly correlated to PFS (p=0.0079), but not to OS (p=0.15). We developed and externally validated on a cohort of 147 patients a logistic nomogram using SII, nodal status and pre-treatment Hb levels. Results showed a good predictive ability with C-index of 0.74. An online available calculator has also been developed. Conclusion: The low cost and easy profile in terms of determination and reproducibility make SII a promising tool for prognostic assessment in this oncological setting.

1 January 2014 in Journal of Ovarian Research
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
FTFederica Tomao
Federica Tomao
GRGiuseppe Lo Russo
Giuseppe Lo Russo
GSGian Paolo Spinelli
Gian Paolo Spinelli
VSValeria Stati
Valeria Stati
APAlessandra Anna Prete
Alessandra Anna Prete
STSilverio Tomao
Silverio Tomao
Several adverse effects have been related to infertility treatments, such as cancer development. In particular, the relationship between infertility, reproductive strategies, and risk of gynecological cancers has aroused much interest in recent years. The evaluation of cancer risk among women treated for infertility is very complex, mainly because of many factors that can contribute to occurrence of cancer in these patients (including parity status). This article addresses the possible association between the use of fertility treatments and the risk of ovarian cancer, through a scrupulous search of the literature published thus far in this field. Our principal objective was to give more conclusive answers on the question whether the use of fertility drug significantly increases ovarian cancer risk. Our analysis focused on the different types of drugs and different treatment schedules used. This study provides additional insights regarding the long-term relationships between fertility drugs and risk of ovarian cancer.

1 September 2018 in Clinical Colorectal Cancer
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MSMarta Schirripa
Marta Schirripa
GPGiuseppe Pasqualetti
Giuseppe Pasqualetti
RGRiccardo Giampieri
Riccardo Giampieri
MSMario Scartozzi
Mario Scartozzi
SLSara Lonardi
Sara Lonardi
FLFotios Loupakis
Fotios Loupakis