Maria Michelagnoli

Dr. Maria Michelagnoli

UCLH NHS foundation trust

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

7Years (2020-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
20 November 2020 in Skeletal Radiology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
RRRamanan Rajakulasingam
Ramanan Rajakulasingam
MSMateen Siddiqui
Mateen Siddiqui
MMMaria Michelagnoli
Maria Michelagnoli
ASAsif Saifuddin
Asif Saifuddin

29 June 2021 in Cancers
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
KIKatrina Ingley
Katrina Ingley
SWSimon Wan
Simon Wan
SVStefan Vöö
Stefan Vöö
RWRachael E. Windsor
Rachael E. Windsor
MMMaria Michelagnoli
Maria Michelagnoli
SSSandra J. Strauss
Sandra J. Strauss
Primary malignant bone sarcomas are rare and Ewing sarcoma (ES), along with osteosarcoma, predominates in teenagers and young adults. The well-established multimodality treatment incorporates systemic chemotherapy with local control in the form of surgery, with or without radiation. The presence and extent of metastases at diagnosis remains the most important prognostic factor in determining patient outcome; patients with skeletal metastases or bone marrow infiltration having a significantly worse outcome than those with lung metastases alone. There is, however, no accepted staging algorithm for ES. Large cooperative groups and national guidelines continue to advocate bone marrow biopsy (BMB) for staging but functional imaging techniques, such as 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) with computerised tomography (CT) have been increasingly used for staging cancers and whole-body magnetic resonance imaging (WB-MRI) for staging skeletal metastases. This review outlines the current literature, from which we conclude that BMB is no longer required for the staging of ES as it does not influence the standard of care management. BMB may, however, provide prognostic information and insights into the biology of ES in selected patients on prospective clinical trials.

26 May 2022 in European Journal of Cancer
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
RWRachael E. Windsor
Rachael E. Windsor
AHAnthony Hamilton
Anthony Hamilton
AMAnne McTiernan
Anne McTiernan
PDPalma Dileo
Palma Dileo
MMMaria Michelagnoli
Maria Michelagnoli
JWJeremy Whelan
Jeremy Whelan

17 November 2020 in Cancers
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
TCThomas J. Carter
Thomas J. Carter
Marina MilicMarina Milic
Marina Milic
JMJoanna McDerra
Joanna McDerra
AMAnne McTiernan
Anne McTiernan
MAMahbubl Ahmed
Mahbubl Ahmed
SSSandra J. Strauss
Sandra J. Strauss
Ifosfamide is used to treat soft-tissue sarcoma (STS) and bone sarcoma (BS), with improved efficacy at doses above 9 g/m2/cycle. To mitigate treatment-associated toxicity with higher doses, continuous infusional ifosfamide is increasingly used. However, clinical outcome data remain limited. Single-centre retrospective analysis of patients treated with four-weekly infusional ifosfamide (14 g/m2/14d) between August 2012 and February 2019 was conducted. Radiological response, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and toxicity were evaluated. Eighty patients were treated—46 with STS and 34 with BS. Patients received a median of three cycles of infusional ifosfamide (1–24). Overall disease control rate (DCR) in STS was 50% (23 of 46 patients), with a median PFS of 3.8 months, and median OS of 13.0 months. In synovial sarcoma (SS), DCR was 80% (12/15), median PFS 8.1 months and median OS 20.9 months. Overall DCR in BS (34 patients) was 30%, with a median PFS of 2.5 months and median OS of 6.2 months. Five patients (6%) stopped treatment due to toxicity alone within the first two cycles. A further 10 patients stopped treatment due to toxicity during later treatment cycles (12%) and 18 patients (23%) required dose modification. Forty-five patients (56%) experienced grade (G) 3/4 haematological toxicity, with 12 episodes of febrile neutropenia and one treatment-related death. Twenty-seven patients (34%) experienced G3/4 non-haematological toxicity, most commonly nausea and vomiting (10, 13%). In summary, infusional ifosfamide has efficacy in STS, most notable in SS. Benefit appears limited in BS. Treatment is associated with toxicity that requires specialist supportive care.