The hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal axis is a tightly regulated system that represents one of the body’s mechanisms for responding to acute and chronic stress. Prolonged stress and/or inadequate regulation of the stress system can lead to a condition of chronic hypercortisolism or, in some cases, a blunted cortisol response to stress, contributing to insulin resistance, increased adiposity and type 2 diabetes mellitus. Moreover, acute and chronic stress can exacerbate or worsen metabolic conditions by supporting an inflammatory state and a tight relationship between stress, inflammation and adipose tissue has been reported and has been a growing subject of interest in recent years. We reviewed and summarized the evidence supporting hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal axis dysregulation as an important biological link between stress, obesity, inflammation and type 2 diabetes mellitus. Furthermore, we emphasized the possible role of infectious-related stress such as SarsCov2 infection in adrenal axis dysregulation, insulin resistance and diabetes in a bidirectional link. Understanding and better defining the links between stress and obesity or diabetes could contribute to further definition of the pathogenesis and the management of stress-related complications, in which the HPA axis dysregulation has a primary role.

Treatment of osteoporosis is aimed to prevent fragility fractures and to stabilize or increase bone mineral density. Several drugs with different efficacy and safety profiles are available. The long-term therapeutic strategy should be planned, and the initial treatment should be selected according to the individual site-specific fracture risk and the need to give the maximal protection when the fracture risk is highest (i.e. in the late life). The present consensus focused on the strategies for the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis taking into consideration all the drugs available for this purpose. A short revision of the literature about treatment of secondary osteoporosis due both to androgen deprivation therapy for prostate cancer and to aromatase inhibitors for breast cancer was also performed. Also premenopausal females and males with osteoporosis are frequently seen in endocrine settings. Finally particular attention was paid to the tailoring of treatment as well as to its duration.

Animal studies indicate that mineralocorticoid receptors (MR) in the hippocampus play a major role in the glucocorticoid feedback control of the hypothalamo-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis. Specifically, MR mediate the proactive feedback of glucocorticoids in the maintenance of basal HPA activity. The stimulatory effect of intracerebroventricular and intrahippocampal MR blockade on the HPA axis in animals has been clearly shown, whereas the effect of systemic administration of mineralocorticoid antagonists in humans is still contradictory. To clarify this point, in seven normal young women (aged 25-32 yr; body mass index, 19.0-23.0 kg/m(2)) we studied the effects of canrenoate (CAN; 200 mg as iv bolus at 2000 h, followed by 200 mg infused in 500 mL saline over 4 h up to 2400 h) or placebo (saline, 1.0 mL as iv bolus at 2000 h, followed by 500 mL over 4 h up to 2400 h) on the spontaneous ACTH, cortisol, dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) and aldosterone secretion as well as on the ACTH, cortisol, and DHEA responses to human CRH (2.0 microg/kg as iv bolus at 2200 h) or arginine vasopressin (AVP; 0.17 U/kg as im bolus at 2200 h). Blood samples were taken every 15 min from 2000-2400 h. During placebo, spontaneous ACTH and cortisol levels showed progressive decreases (P < 0.05) from 2000-2400 h (baseline vs. nadir, mean +/- SEM, 2.0 +/- 0.3 vs. 1.4 +/- 0.2 pmol/L and 115.1 +/- 23.7 vs. 63.5 +/- 24.3 nmol/L), whereas DHEA and aldosterone levels did not change. CRH induced clear increases in ACTH, cortisol, and DHEA levels (peaks, mean +/- SEM, 7.1 +/- 1.1 vs. 1.6 +/- 0.2 pmol/L, 322.9 +/- 19.5 vs. 92.8 +/- 24.5 nmol/L, and 44.2 +/- 2.7 vs. 20.0 +/- 3.0 nmol/L; P < 0.05). Similarly, AVP elicited significant increases in ACTH, cortisol, and DHEA levels (3.8 +/- 0.3 vs. 1.5 +/- 0.1 pmol/L, 211.9 +/- 27.2 vs. 67.7 +/- 9.7 nmol/L, and 51.6 +/- 4.0 vs. 16.3 +/- 2.0 nmol/L; P < 0.05). During CAN treatment, ACTH, cortisol, and DHEA levels showed progressive rises, which begun at approximately 60 min and peaked between 2300 and 2400 h (ACTH, 3.4 +/- 0.4 vs. 1.1 +/- 0.3 pmol/L; cortisol, 314.5 +/- 49.6 vs. 123.3 +/- 13.2 nmol/L; DHEA, 52.0 +/- 8.8 vs. 21.0 +/- 2.3 nmol/L; P < 0.05 vs. baseline as well as vs. the same time points during placebo). Aldosterone secretion was not modified by CAN. The ACTH, cortisol, and DHEA responses to human CRH were enhanced by CAN (10.0 +/- 1.7 pmol/L, 462.2 +/- 36.9 nmol/L, and 66.3 +/- 8.8 nmol/L), although statistical significance (P < 0.05) was obtained for cortisol and DHEA only. Also the ACTH, cortisol and DHEA responses to AVP were amplified by CAN (8.0 +/- 2.6 pmol/L, 324.0 +/- 34.8 nmol/L, and 77.8 +/- 4.0 nmol/L); again, statistical significance (P < 0.05) was obtained for cortisol and DHEA only. In conclusion, our study shows that the blockade of MR by CAN significantly enhances the activity of the HPA axis in humans, indicating a physiological role for MR in its control. These results also suggest that the stimulatory effect of CAN on HPA axis is mediated by concomitant modulation of CRH and AVP release.