Dr. Brad Ridoutt
Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO), Clayton, Victoria 3169, Australia
'%3e%3cpath%20d='M22.1642%2019.0924C21.7317%2018.068%2021.1041%2017.1375%2020.3163%2016.3527C19.5309%2015.5656%2018.6006%2014.9381%2017.5766%2014.5048C17.5674%2014.5002%2017.5582%2014.4979%2017.5491%2014.4933C18.9774%2013.4616%2019.9059%2011.7811%2019.9059%209.88504C19.9059%206.74408%2017.3611%204.19922%2014.2201%204.19922C11.0792%204.19922%208.53429%206.74408%208.53429%209.88504C8.53429%2011.7811%209.46282%2013.4616%2010.8912%2014.4956C10.882%2014.5002%2010.8728%2014.5025%2010.8636%2014.5071C9.83652%2014.9404%208.91487%2015.5617%208.1239%2016.355C7.33685%2017.1404%206.70933%2018.0707%206.276%2019.0947C5.85031%2020.0972%205.62072%2021.172%205.59967%2022.2609C5.59905%2022.2853%205.60335%2022.3097%205.61229%2022.3325C5.62123%2022.3553%205.63465%2022.376%205.65174%2022.3935C5.66883%2022.4111%205.68926%2022.425%205.71182%2022.4345C5.73437%2022.444%205.7586%2022.4489%205.78308%2022.4489H7.15868C7.25956%2022.4489%207.3398%2022.3686%207.3421%2022.2701C7.38795%2020.5001%208.09868%2018.8425%209.35506%2017.5861C10.655%2016.2862%2012.3814%2015.5709%2014.2201%2015.5709C16.0588%2015.5709%2017.7852%2016.2862%2019.0852%2017.5861C20.3415%2018.8425%2021.0523%2020.5001%2021.0981%2022.2701C21.1004%2022.3709%2021.1807%2022.4489%2021.2815%2022.4489H22.6571C22.6816%2022.4489%2022.7058%2022.444%2022.7284%2022.4345C22.751%2022.425%2022.7714%2022.4111%2022.7885%2022.3935C22.8056%2022.376%2022.819%2022.3553%2022.8279%2022.3325C22.8369%2022.3097%2022.8412%2022.2853%2022.8406%2022.2609C22.8176%2021.165%2022.5907%2020.0989%2022.1642%2019.0924ZM14.2201%2013.8284C13.1678%2013.8284%2012.1773%2013.418%2011.4322%2012.6729C10.6871%2011.9278%2010.2767%2010.9374%2010.2767%209.88504C10.2767%208.83271%2010.6871%207.84227%2011.4322%207.09715C12.1773%206.35204%2013.1678%205.94165%2014.2201%205.94165C15.2724%205.94165%2016.2629%206.35204%2017.008%207.09715C17.7531%207.84227%2018.1635%208.83271%2018.1635%209.88504C18.1635%2010.9374%2017.7531%2011.9278%2017.008%2012.6729C16.2629%2013.418%2015.2724%2013.8284%2014.2201%2013.8284Z'%20fill='%238590A2'/%3e%3c/g%3e%3c/svg%3e)
Co-authors
Following
Followers
Research Focus & Metrics
Explore full metrics on Scilit
Academic Career Length
34Years (1993-Present)
(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)
Representative Publications
View All Publications8 June 2017 in The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment
Journal Article
Anne-Marie BoulayJBJane Bare
Jane Bare
LBLorenzo Benini
Lorenzo BeniniMBMarkus Berger
Markus Berger
Michael J. LathuillièreSPStephan Pfister
Stephan Pfister +8
Life cycle assessment (LCA) has been used to assess freshwater-related impacts according to a new water footprint framework formalized in the ISO 14046 standard. To date, no consensus-based approach exists for applying this standard and results are not always comparable when different scarcity or stress indicators are used for characterization of impacts. This paper presents the outcome of a 2-year consensus building process by the Water Use in Life Cycle Assessment (WULCA), a working group of the UNEP-SETAC Life Cycle Initiative, on a water scarcity midpoint method for use in LCA and for water scarcity footprint assessments.
1 August 2017 in Journal of Cleaner Production
Journal Article
JHJing Huang
Jing Huang
CXChang-Chun Xu
Chang-Chun Xu
Brad RidouttXWXue-Chun Wang
Xue-Chun Wang
PRPin-An Ren
Pin-An Ren
1 February 2010 in Global Environmental Change
Journal Article
Brad RidouttSPStephan Pfister
Stephan Pfister27 October 2012 in The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment
Journal Article
AKAnna Kounina
Anna KouninaMMManuele Margni
Manuele Margni
JBJean-Baptiste Bayart
Jean-Baptiste Bayart
ABAnne-Marie Boulay
Anne-Marie Boulay
MBMarkus Berger
Markus Berger
SHSebastien Humbert
Sebastien Humbert
+11
In recent years, several methods have been developed which propose different freshwater use inventory schemes and impact assessment characterization models considering various cause–effect chain relationships. This work reviewed a multitude of methods and indicators for freshwater use potentially applicable in life cycle assessment (LCA). This review is used as a basis to identify the key elements to build a scientific consensus for operational characterization methods for LCA.
10 September 2017 in Journal of Cleaner Production
Journal Article
FVFrancesca Verones
Francesca Verones
JBJane Bare
Jane Bare
CBCécile Bulle
Cécile Bulle
RFRolf Frischknecht
Rolf FrischknechtMHMichael Hauschild
Michael HauschildPFPeter Fantke
Peter Fantke +17
1 January 2017 in Ecological Indicators
Journal Article
SPStephan Pfister
Stephan PfisterABAnne-Marie Boulay
Anne-Marie Boulay
MBMarkus Berger
Markus Berger
MHMichalis Hadjikakou
Michalis Hadjikakou
Masaharu MotoshitaAHAndrew D Henderson
Andrew D Henderson +14
About Me
Dr. Bradley Ridoutt holds a PhD from the University of Melbourne, Australia. He is currently a Principal Research Scientist with Australia’s national science agency – The Commonwealth Scientific and
Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO). His expertise is in life cycle sustainability assessment in the agriculture and food sectors, which is used to address strategic challenges in relation to climate change, water scarcity, sustainable food systems, and sustainable diets. He has a particular interest in the topic of biogenic methane. Dr. Ridoutt is engaged in a range of international processes relating to the standardization of sustainability assessment, greenhouse gas and climate change management, and environmental labelling. His research is creating the main evidence base concerning the environmental impacts of dietary habits in Australia.