Renée Mie Fredensborg Hansen

Ms. Renée Mie Fredensborg Hansen

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

7Years (2020-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
10 December 2021 in The Cryosphere
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
florent garnierflorent garnier
florent garnier
SFSara Fleury
Sara Fleury
GGGilles Garric
Gilles Garric
JBJérôme Bouffard
Jérôme Bouffard
MTMichel Tsamados
Michel Tsamados
FRFrédérique Remy
Frédérique Remy
Although snow depth on sea ice is a key parameter for sea ice thickness (SIT) retrieval, there currently does not exist reliable estimations. In the Arctic, nearly all SIT products use a snow depth climatology (the modified Warren-99 climatology, W99m) constructed from in situ data obtained prior to the first significant impacts of climate change. In the Antarctic, the lack of information on snow depth remains a major obstacle in the development of reliable SIT products. In this study, we present the latest version of the altimetric snow depth (ASD) product computed over both hemispheres from the difference of the radar penetration into the snow pack between the Ka-band frequency SARAL/Altika and the Ku-band frequency CryoSat-2. The ASD solution is compared against a wide range of snow depth products including model data (Pan-Arctic Ice-Ocean Modelling and Assimilation System (PIOMAS) or its equivalent in the Antarctic the Global Ice-Ocean Modeling and Assimilation System (GIOMAS), the MERCATOR model, and NASA's Eulerian Snow On Sea Ice Model (NESOSIM, only in the Arctic)), the Advanced Microwave Scanning Radiometer-2 (AMSR2) passive radiometer data, and the Dual-altimeter Snow Thickness (DuST) Ka–Ku product (only in the Arctic). The ASD product is further validated in the Arctic against the ice mass balance (IMB) buoys, the CryoSat Validation Experiment (CryoVEx) and Operation Ice Bridge's (OIB) airborne measurements. These comparisons demonstrate that ASD is a relevant snow depth solution, with spatiotemporal patterns consistent with those of the alternative Ka–Ku DuST product but with a mean bias of about 6.5 cm. We also demonstrate that ASD is consistent with the validation data: comparisons with OIB's airborne snow radar in the Arctic during the period of 2014–2018 show a correlation of 0.66 and a RMSE of about 6 cm. Furthermore, a first-guess monthly climatology has been constructed in the Arctic from the ASD product, which shows a good agreement with OIB during 2009–2012. This climatology is shown to provide a better solution than the W99m climatology when compared with validation data. Finally, we have characterised the SIT uncertainty due to the snow depth from an ensemble of SIT solutions computed for the Arctic by using the different snow depth products previously used in the comparison with the ASD product. During the period of 2013–2019, we found a spatially averaged SIT mean standard deviation of 20 cm. Deviations between SIT estimations due to snow depths can reach up to 77 cm. Using the ASD data instead of W99m to estimate SIT over this time period leads to a reduction in the average SIT of about 30 cm.

31 March 2023 in The Cryosphere
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
RRRobert Ricker
Robert Ricker
SFSteven Fons
Steven Fons
AJArttu Jutila
Arttu Jutila
NHNils Hutter
Nils Hutter
KDKyle Duncan
Kyle Duncan
RHRenée Mie Fredensborg Hansen
Renée Mie Fredensborg Hansen
Information about sea ice surface topography and related deformation is crucial for studies of sea ice mass balance, sea ice modeling, and ship navigation through the ice pack. The Ice, Cloud, and land Elevation Satellite-2 (ICESat-2), part of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) Earth Observing System, has been on orbit for over 4 years, sensing the sea ice surface topography with six laser beams capable of capturing individual features such as pressure ridges. To assess the capabilities and uncertainties of ICESat-2 products, coincident high-resolution measurements of sea ice surface topography are required. During the yearlong Multidisciplinary drifting Observatory for the Study of Arctic Climate (MOSAiC) expedition in the Arctic Ocean, we successfully carried out a coincident underflight of ICESat-2 with a helicopter-based airborne laser scanner (ALS), achieving an overlap of more than 100 km. Despite the comparably short data set, the high-resolution centimeter-scale measurements of the ALS can be used to evaluate the performance of ICESat-2 products. Our goal is to investigate how the sea ice surface roughness and topography are represented in different ICESat-2 products as well as how sensitive ICESat-2 products are to leads and small cracks in the ice cover. Here, we compare the ALS measurements with ICESat-2's primary sea ice height product, ATL07, and the high-fidelity surface elevation product developed by the University of Maryland (UMD). By applying a ridge-detection algorithm, we find that 16 % (4 %) of the number of obstacles in the ALS data set are found using the strong (weak) center beam in ATL07. Significantly higher detection rates of 42 % (30 %) are achieved when using the UMD product. While only one lead is indicated in ATL07 for the underflight, the ALS reveals many small, narrow, and only partly open cracks that appear to be overlooked by ATL07.

18 April 2024 in Earth and Space Science
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
RHRenée Mie Fredensborg Hansen
Renée Mie Fredensborg Hansen
HSHenriette Skourup
Henriette Skourup
EREero Rinne
Eero Rinne
KHKnut V. Høyland
Knut V. Høyland
JLJack Landy
Jack Landy
RFRené Forsberg
René Forsberg
In the summer of 2020, ESA changed the orbit of CryoSat‐2 to align periodically with NASA's ICESat‐2 mission, a campaign known as CRYO2ICE, which allows for near‐coincident CryoSat‐2 and ICESat‐2 observations in space and time over the Arctic until summer 2022, where the CRYO2ICE Antarctic campaign was initiated. This study investigates the Arctic CRYO2ICE radar and laser freeboards acquired by CryoSat‐2 and ICESat‐2, respectively, during the winter seasons of 2020–2022, and derives snow depths from their differences along the orbits. Along‐track snow depth observations can provide high‐resolution snow depth distributions which are vital for air‐ice‐ocean heat and momentum transfer, understanding light transmission, and snow‐ice‐interactions. Generally, ICESat‐2 is backscattered at a surface above the elevation of the CryoSat‐2 signal. CRYO2ICE snow depths are thinner than the daily model‐ or passive‐microwave‐based snow depth composites used for comparison, with differences being most pronounced in the Atlantic and Pacific Arctic. Satellite‐derived and model‐based snow estimates show similar seasonal accumulation over first‐year ice, but CRYO2ICE has limited seasonal accumulation over multi‐year ice which is linked to a slow increase in ICESat‐2, and to some extent CryoSat‐2, freeboards. We present a first estimation of spaceborne along‐track snow depth estimates with average uncertainty of 10–11 ± 2–3 cm for 7‐km segments, with random and systematic contributions of 7 and 4 cm. These observations show the potential for along‐track dual‐frequency observations of snow depth from the future Copernicus mission CRISTAL; but they also highlight uncertainties in radar penetration and the correlation length scales of snow topography that still require further research.

11 August 2021 in Remote Sensing
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
RHRenée Mie Fredensborg Hansen
Renée Mie Fredensborg Hansen
EREero Rinne
Eero Rinne
HSHenriette Skourup
Henriette Skourup
An important step in the sea ice freeboard to thickness conversion is the classification of sea ice types, since the ice type affects the snow depth and ice density. Studies using Ku-band CryoSat-2 have shown promise in distinguishing FYI and MYI based on the parametrisation of the radar echo. Here, we investigate applying the same classification algorithms that have shown success for Ku-band measurements to measurements acquired by SARAL/AltiKa at the Ka-band. Four different classifiers are investigated, i.e., the threshold-based, Bayesian, Random Forest (RF) and k-nearest neighbour (KNN), by using data from five 35 day cycles during Arctic mid-winter in 2014–2018. The overall classification performance shows the highest accuracy of 93% for FYI (Bayesian classifier) and 39% for MYI (threshold-based classifier). For all classification algorithms, more than half of the MYI cover falsely classifies as FYI, showing the difference in the surface characteristics attainable by Ka-band compared to Ku-band due to different scattering mechanisms. However, high overall classification performance (above 90%) is estimated for FYI for three supervised classifiers (KNN, RF and Bayesian). Furthermore, the leading-edge width parameter shows potential in discriminating open water (ocean) and sea ice when visually compared with reference data. Our results encourage the use of waveform parameters in the further validation of sea ice/open water edges and discrimination of sea ice types combining Ka- and Ku-band, especially with the planned launch of the dual-frequency altimeter mission Copernicus Polar Ice and Snow Topography Altimeter (CRISTAL) in 2027.

2 June 2021 in The Cryosphere
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
RHRenée Mie Fredensborg Hansen
Renée Mie Fredensborg Hansen
EREero Rinne
Eero Rinne
SFSinéad Louise Farrell
Sinéad Louise Farrell
HSHenriette Skourup
Henriette Skourup
We present a comparison of Ice, Cloud and land Elevation Satellite-2 (ICESat-2) geolocated photon heights and operational ice charts from the Finnish Ice Service in the Bay of Bothnia in spring 2019. We show that ICESat-2 (IS2) retrievals from ice areas with different ridging characteristics, more precisely the degree of ice ridging (DIR), differ significantly. DIR is a particularly useful parameter for ice navigators, as it provides information on how difficult it is to navigate through an area based on e.g. sail heights and distribution of sea ice ridges. DIR estimates are included in ice charts of the Baltic Sea and are based primarily on in situ observations from an active icebreaker fleet. We show that DIR may potentially be estimated from IS2. We also present a comparison of IS2 measurements and Sentinel-1 synthetic aperture radar frames, discussing several individual cases of IS2 photon elevation behaviour over Baltic sea ice. We suggest that IS2 data can be of benefit to international ice services, especially if a time-critical photon height product were to be made available. Furthermore, we show that the difference between highest and mean photon elevations (elevation anomalies) of IS2 correspond to expected ridge sail heights in our study area. Our study is one of the first steps in creating sea ice applications beyond the traditional goal of freeboard and thickness retrieval for IS2.

5 October 2023 in Remote Sensing
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ESElodie Da Silva
Elodie Da Silva
EWEmma Woolliams
Emma Woolliams
NPNicolas Picot
Nicolas Picot
JPJean-Christophe Poisson
Jean-Christophe Poisson
HSHenriette Skourup
Henriette Skourup
Pierre FemeniasPierre Femenias
Pierre Femenias
The Copernicus Sentinel-3 Surface Topography Mission (STM) Land Altimetry provides valuable surface elevation information over inland waters, sea ice, and land ice, thanks to its synthetic aperture radar (SAR) altimeter and its orbit that covers high-latitude polar regions. To ensure that these measurements are reliable and to maximise the return on investment, adequate validation of the geophysical retrieval methods, processing algorithms, and corrections must be performed using independent observations. The EU-ESA project St3TART (started July 2021) aims to generalise the concept of Fiducial Reference Measurements (FRMs) for the Copernicus Sentinel-3 STM. This work has gathered existing data, made new observations during field campaigns, and ensured that these observations meet the criteria of FRM standards so that they can be used to validate Sentinel-3 STM Land Altimetry products operationally. A roadmap for the operational provision of the FRM, including the definition, consolidation, and identification of the most relevant and cost-effective methods and protocols to be maintained, supported, or implemented, has been developed. The roadmap includes guidelines for SI traceability, definitions of FRM measurement procedures, processing methods, and uncertainty budget estimations.