Myocardial microvasculature and haemodynamics are indicative of potential microvascular diseases for patients with symptoms of coronary heart disease in the absence of obstructive coronary arteries. However, imaging microvascular structure and flow within the myocardium is challenging owing to the small size of the vessels and the constant movement of the patient’s heart. Here we show the feasibility of transthoracic ultrasound localization microscopy for imaging myocardial microvasculature and haemodynamics in explanted pig hearts and in patients in vivo. Through a customized data-acquisition and processing pipeline with a cardiac phased-array probe, we leveraged motion correction and tracking to reconstruct the dynamics of microcirculation. For four patients, two of whom had impaired myocardial function, we obtained super-resolution images of myocardial vascular structure and flow using data acquired within a breath hold. Myocardial ultrasound localization microscopy may facilitate the understanding of myocardial microcirculation and the management of patients with cardiac microvascular diseases.

Successful ventricular arrhythmia (VA) ablation requires identification of functionally critical sites during contact mapping. Estimation of the peak frequency (PF) component of the electrogram (EGM) may improve correct near-field (NF) annotation to identify circuit segments on the mapped surface. In turn, assessment of NF and far-field (FF) EGMs may delineate the three-dimensional path of a ventricular tachycardia (VT) circuit. A proprietary NF detection algorithm was applied retrospectively to scar-related re-entry VT maps and compared with manually reviewed maps employing first deflection (FD_corr) for VT activation maps and last deflection (LD) for substrate maps. Ventricular tachycardia isthmus location and characteristics mapped with FD_corr vs. NF were compared. Omnipolar low-voltage areas, late activating areas, and deceleration zones (DZ) in LD vs. NF substrate maps were compared. On substrate maps, PF estimation was compared between isthmus and bystander sites. Activation mapping with entrainment and/or VT termination with radiofrequency (RF) ablation confirmed critical sites. Eighteen patients with high-density VT activation and substrate maps (55.6% ischaemic) were included. Near-field detection correctly located critical parts of the circuit in 77.7% of the cases compared with manually reviewed VT maps as reference. In substrate maps, NF detection identified deceleration zones in 88.8% of cases, which overlapped with FD_corr VT isthmus in 72.2% compared with 83.3% overlap of DZ assessed by LD. Applied to substrate maps, PF as a stand-alone feature did not differentiate VT isthmus sites from low-voltage bystander sites. Omnipolar voltage was significantly higher at isthmus sites with longer EGM durations compared with low-voltage bystander sites. The NF algorithm may enable rapid high-density activation mapping of VT circuits in the NF of the mapped surface. Integrated assessment and combined analysis of NF and FF EGM-components could support characterization of three-dimensional VT circuits with intramural segments. For scar-related substrate mapping, PF as a stand-alone EGM feature did not enable the differentiation of functionally critical sites of the dominant VT from low-voltage bystander sites in this cohort. Left top: LAT emphasis maps in VT activation mapping—Exemplary VT LAT maps with LAT-on-LAT emphasis in a RV VT and LV VT to highlight diastolic potentials. Left bottom: Example of left ventricular substrate map in a patient with extensive chronic anterior myocardial infarct (left, grey < 0.1 mV, purple > 1.5 mV) with emphasis on high-frequency EGMs (middle, emphasizing EGMs with >250 Hz) and visualization of peak frequency values (right, with nominal thresholds of EnSite X: grey < 200 Hz, white > 250 Hz). Right: Schematic illustration of how integration of NF and FF information may allow to distinguish two- and three-dimensional VT circuits and estimate the three-dimensional path of the VT_CC. Yet, important confounders for using NF and peak frequency in ventricular mapping exist and need to be considered. 2D, two-dimensional; 3D, three-dimensional; EGM, electrogram; ICM, ischaemic cardiomyopathy; FF, far field; LV, left ventricle; NF, near field; RV, right ventricle; VT, ventricular tachycardia.

Implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) have revolutionized the treatment of acquired or inherited cardiac diseases associated with a high risk of sudden cardiac death due to ventricular tachyarrhythmias. Contemporary ICD devices offer reliable arrhythmia detection and discrimination algorithms and deliver highly efficient tachytherapies. Percutaneously inserted transvenous defibrillator coils with pectoral generator placement are the first-line approach in the majority of adults due to their extensively documented clinical benefit and efficiency with comparably low periprocedural implantation risks as well as the option of providing pain-free tachycardia treatment via anti-tachycardia pacing (ATP), concomitant bradycardiaprotection, and incorporation in a cardiac resynchronization therapy if indicated. Yet, expanding ICD indications particularly among younger and more complex patient groups as well as the increasingly evident long-term consequences and complications associated with intravascular lead placements promoted the development of alternative ICD configurations. Most established in daily clinical practice is the subcutaneous ICD but other innovative extravascular approaches like epicardial, pericardial, extra-pleural, and most recently substernal defibrillator coil placements have been introduced as well to overcome shortcomings associated with traditional devices and allow for individualized treatment strategies tailored to the patients characteristics and needs. The review aims to provide practical solutions for common complications encountered with transvenous ICD systems including restricted venous access, high defibrillation/fibrillation thresholds (DFTs), and recurrent device infections. We summarize the contemporary options for non-traditional extravascular ICD configurations outlining indications, advantages, and disadvantages.

Electrical conduction through cardiac muscle fibres separated from the main myocardial wall by layers of interposed adipose tissue are notoriously difficult to target by endocardial ablation alone. They are a recognised important cause for procedural failure due to the difficulties of delivering sufficient energy via the endocardial radiofrequency catheter to reach the outer epicardial layer without risking adverse events of the otherwise thin walled atria. Left atrial ablations for atrial fibrillation (AF) and tachycardia are commonly affected by the presence of several epicardial structures, with the septo-pulmonary bundle (SPB), Bachmann’s bundle, and the ligament of Marshall all posing substantial challenges for endocardial procedures. Delivery of a transmural lesion set is essential for sustained pulmonary vein isolation and for conduction block across linear atrial lines which in turn has been described to translate into a reduced AF/atrial tachycardia recurrence rate. To overcome the limitations of endocardial-only approaches, surgical ablation techniques for epicardial or combined hybrid endo-epicardial ablations have been described to successfully target these connections. Yet, these techniques confer an increase in procedure complexity, duration, cost, and morbidity. Alternatively, coronary venous system ethanol ablation has been successfully employed by sub-selecting the vein of Marshall to facilitate mitral isthmus line block, although this approach is naturally limited to this area by the coronary venous anatomy. Increased awareness of the pathophysiological relevance of these epicardial structures and their intracardiac conduction patterns in the era of high-resolution 3D electro-anatomical mapping technology has allowed greater understanding of their contribution to the persistence of AF as well as failure to achieve transmural block by traditional ablation approaches. This might translate into novel catheter ablation strategies with procedural success rates comparable to surgical ‘cut-and-sew’ techniques. This review aims to give an overview of percutaneous catheter ablation strategies to target the SPB, an important cause of failed block across the roof line and isolation of the left atrial posterior wall and/or the pulmonary veins. Existing and investigational technologies will be discussed and an outlook of future approaches provided.

Background: Epicardial ICD systems and CRT‐Ds using high voltage coils represent an alternative to transvenous systems in patients without central venous access and prior device complications including infection.Objective: We present a case series in the adult population of epicardial ICD/CRTD systems using high voltage epicardial coils. We summarize the existing data regarding techniques, efficacy, and safety.Methods: A retrospective board approved medical record review was conducted for all patients undergoing epicardial ICD/CRTD placement at our institution between January 2010 and May 2020. The literature was reviewed for prior published trials, case reports, and case series of epicardial high voltage coil insertions.Results: Eleven patients (six female, mean age 48 years) underwent epicardial ICD/CRTD implant including 5/11 completely epicardial CRTD systems. The procedure was performed via median sternotomy in eight patients, left anterior thoracotomy in two patients, and sub‐xiphoid approach in one patient. After a mean follow up of 35 months, appropriate successful shocks were delivered in two (18%) patients and no patients received an inappropriate shock. Three of five (60%) patients had volumetric remodeling with CRT with significant improvement of LV EF. Device‐related complications requiring a surgical/percutaneous revision or another DFT test occurred in six patients (54%). One patient died during follow up due to refractory heart failure. No cases of epicardial device infection, coronary artery compression, constrictive pericarditis, or erosion of defibrillator coils into intrathoracic organs were reported. No randomized studies comparing safety and efficacy of traditional transvenous or subcutaneous ICD systems and epicardial ICD systems using contemporary high voltage coils were found nor any studies directly comparing epicardial defibrillator patches versus epicardial coils. Thirteen case series and 24 single case reports published between 2004 and 2020 were identified describing in total a heterogenous group of 188 patients with ICD systems incorporating one or more epi‐ or pericardially positioned shock coils.Conclusion: The use of epicardial defibrillation coils for ICD/CRT‐D is a feasible treatment option for patients with either failed or contraindicated transvenous ICD systems. Dedicated epicardial high voltage leads with integrated pace‐sense electrodes and specialized delivery tools for minimal invasive implantations may improve longer term outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Among inherited cardiomyopathies involving the left ventricle, whether dilated or not, certain genotypes carry a well-established arrhythmic risk, notably manifested as sustained monomorphic ventricular tachycardia (SMVT). Nonetheless, the precise localization and electrophysiological profile of this substrate remain undisclosed across different genotypes. METHODS: Patients diagnosed with cardiomyopathy and left ventricle involvement due to high-risk genetic variants and SMVT treated by electrophysiological study were recruited from 18 European/US centers. Electrophysiological study, imaging, and outcomes data after ablation were assessed in relation to genotype. RESULTS: Seventy-one patients were included (49.6 Q1–Q3 [40–60] years, 76% men). They were divided into 4 groups according to the affected protein: desmosomal ( DSP , PKP2 , DSG2 , and DSC2 ), nuclear membrane ( LMNA and TMEM43 ), cytoskeleton ( FLNC and DES ), and sarcoplasmic reticulum ( PLN ). Desmosomal genes, TMEM43 , and PLN were associated with biventricular disease, while variants in LMNA and cytoskeleton genes had predominant left ventricle involvement ( P =0.001). The location of the clinical-SMVT substrate was significantly different based on genotype ( P =0.005). DSP and cytoskeleton genes presented SMVTs with right bundle branch block morphology, which origin was identified in the inferolateral segments of the left ventricle. The other desmosomal genes ( PKP2 and DSG2 ), along with TMEM43 , showed SMVTs with left bundle branch block morphology and predominantly right ventricular substrate. In contrast, LMNA substrate was mainly observed in the interventricular septum. During a median of 26 Q1–Q3 (10.6–65) months, 27% of patients experienced recurrences of clinical SMVT with differences between genotypes (log-rank 0.016). Nuclear membrane genes demonstrated the highest recurrence rate compared with desmosomal genes (hazard ratio, 4.56 [95% CI, 1.5–13.8]). CONCLUSIONS: The anatomic substrate of SMVTs shows a strong correlation with the underlying genotype, electrocardiographic morphology, and recurrence rate. Particularly, patients with nuclear membrane gene variants have a significantly higher recurrence rate compared with those with desmosomal gene variants.