Coal plasticity is a phenomenon directly affecting the creation of coke structure. It is very much a time- and temperature-dependent transformation of the coal matrix, which allows changing the physical phase from solid to liquid-like and again into solid of different properties. The coking process, particularly in a plasticization temperature range, can be considered as a non-isothermal reaction at a constant heating rate. In this work, a macro-kinetics approach is applied that results in effective kinetic parameters, i.e. pre-exponential factor and activation energy. It is postulated in this work that the original content of metaplast (M0) is a part of volatile matter that melts under the effect of temperature. The coal sample can melt steadily with the temperature increase, achieving the maximum fluidity (Fmax) when the total amount of metaplast available turns into the plastic state. Coal behaviour while it is being heated can be described by two mechanisms. Under first one, the coal turns into plastic phase starting at t1 and ending at tmax, where solidification starts. This can be considered as independent reactions model. In the second model, both plasticization and solidification reactions compete over entire range of phenomena. This can be considered as reactions in the series model. The developed models were validated against experimental data of coal fluidity delivering kinetic parameters.
Thermodynamic analysis of a gasification process was conducted assuming that it is composed of two successive stages, namely: pyrolysis reaction followed by a stage of gasification reaction. This approach allows formulation the models of selected gasification processes dominating in industrial applications namely: Shell (coal), SES (coal), and DFB (dual fluid bed, biomass) gasification. It was shown that the enthalpy of fuel formation is essential for the correctness of computed results. The specific computational formula for a wide range of fuels enthalpy of formation was developed. The following categories were evaluated in terms of energy balance: total reaction enthalpy of gasification process, enthalpy of pyrolysis reaction, enthalpy of gasification reaction, heat demand for pyrolysis reaction, and heat demand for gasification reactions. The discussion of heat demand for particular stages of gasification related to the various processes was performed concluding the importance of the pyrolysis stage.
Biomass gasification, as a thermochemical method, has attracted interest due to the growing popularity of biofuel production using syngas or pure hydrogen. Additionally, this hydrogen production method, when integrated with CO2 capture, may have negative CO2 emissions, which makes this process competitive with electrolysis and coal gasification. This article presents the results of process and economic analyses of a hydrogen production system integrated with a commercial, fluidized-bed solid fuel gasification reactor (SES technology—Synthesis Energy Systems). With the use of a single gasification unit with a capacity of 60 t/h of raw biomass, the system produces between 72.5 and 78.4 t/d of hydrogen depending on the configuration considered. Additionally, assuming the CO2 emission neutrality of biomass processing, the application of CO2 capture leads to negative CO2 emissions. This allows for obtaining additional revenue from the sale of CO2 emission allowances, which can significantly reduce the costs of hydrogen production. In this analysis, the breakthrough price for CO2 emissions, above which the hydrogen production costs are negative, is USD 240/t CO2.
1 March 2015 in Chemical and Process Engineering: New Frontiers
A modified approach to equilibrium modelling of coal gasification is presented, based on global thermodynamic analysis of both homogeneous and heterogeneous reactions occurring during a gasification process conducted in a circulating fluid bed reactor. The model is based on large-scale experiments (ca. 200 kg/h) with air used as a gasification agent and introduces empirical modifications governing the quasi-equilibrium state of two reactions: water-gas shift and Boudouard reaction. The model predicts the formation of the eight key gaseous species: CO, CO2, H2O, H2, H2S, N2, COS and CH4, volatile hydrocarbons represented by propane and benzene, tar represented by naphthalene, and char containing the five elements C, H, O, N, S and inorganic matter
Biomass gasification, as a thermochemical process, has attracted growing interest due to the increasing popularity of biofuel production based on syngas or pure hydrogen. Moreover, when integrated with CO2 capture, this method of producing gaseous fuels can achieve negative CO2 emissions, making it competitive with other production systems based on either fossil or renewable sources. This paper presents the results of a process and economic analysis of synthetic natural gas (SNG) production systems integrated with a commercial fluidized-bed gasification reactor based on Synthesis Energy Systems (SES) technology. The study examines the potential integration of the system with a water electrolyzer at two levels of coupling: one providing oxygen for the gasification process, and the other eliminating the need for CO2 separation before the SNG synthesis stage. Using a single gasification unit with a raw biomass feed rate of 60 t/h, the system produces 188 t/d of SNG. Integration with a water electrolyzer increases SNG production to 259 and 621 t/d. For cases without electrolyzer integration and under the assumption of zero emissions from biomass processing, the application of CO2 separation enables the achievement of negative CO2 emissions. This creates an opportunity for additional revenue from the sale of CO2 emission allowances, which can significantly reduce SNG production costs. In this analysis, the break-even CO2 price, above which the SNG production cost becomes negative, is USD 251/t CO2. In systems integrated with water electrolysis, the cost and carbon footprint of the electricity consumed in the electrochemical water-splitting process have a decisive impact on both the overall SNG production cost and its carbon intensity.