Michitaka Ozaki

Dr. Michitaka Ozaki

Department of Biological Response and Regulation, Faculty of Health Sciences, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Hokkaido 060-0812, Japan
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

24Years (2003-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 November 2005 in Journal of Hepatology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SHSanae Haga
Sanae Haga
WOWataru Ogawa
Wataru Ogawa
HIHiroshi Inoue
Hiroshi Inoue
KTKeita Terui
Keita Terui
TOTetsuya Ogino
Tetsuya Ogino
Michitaka OzakiMichitaka Ozaki
Michitaka Ozaki

1 April 2020 in Seminars in Cell & Developmental Biology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Michitaka OzakiMichitaka Ozaki
Michitaka Ozaki

19 November 2007 in Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
HMHiroshi Murata
Hiroshi Murata
TYTakahito Yagi
Takahito Yagi
HIHiromi Iwagaki
Hiromi Iwagaki
TOTetsuya Ogino
Tetsuya Ogino
HSHiroshi Sadamori
Hiroshi Sadamori
Michitaka OzakiMichitaka Ozaki
Michitaka Ozaki

20 December 2014 in Antioxidants & Redox Signaling
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SHSanae Haga
Sanae Haga
Takeaki OzawaTakeaki Ozawa
Takeaki Ozawa
YYYuma Yamada
Yuma Yamada
NMNaoki Morita
Naoki Morita
INIzuru Nagashima
Izuru Nagashima
Michitaka OzakiMichitaka Ozaki
Michitaka Ozaki
Aims: Liver injury and regeneration involve complicated processes and are affected by various physio-pathological factors. We investigated the mechanisms of steatosis-associated liver injury and delayed regeneration in a mouse model of partial hepatectomy. Results: Initial regeneration of the steatotic liver was significantly delayed after hepatectomy. Although hepatocyte proliferation was not significantly suppressed, severe liver injury with oxidative stress (OS) occurred immediately after hepatectomy in the steatotic liver. Fas-ligand (FasL)/Fas expression was upregulated in the steatotic liver, whereas the expression of antioxidant and anti-apoptotic molecules (catalase/MnSOD/Ref-1 and Bcl-2/Bcl-xL/FLIP, respectively) and p62/SQSTM1, a steatosis-associated protein, was downregulated. Interestingly, pro-survival Akt was not activated in response to hepatectomy, although it was sufficiently expressed even before hepatectomy. Suppression of p62/SQSTM1 increased FasL/Fas expression and reduced nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor-2 (Nrf-2)-dependent antioxidant response elements activity and antioxidant responses in steatotic and nonsteatotic hepatocytes. Exogenously added FasL induced severe cellular OS and necrosis/apoptosis in steatotic hepatocytes, with only the necrosis being inhibited by pretreatment with antioxidants, suggesting that FasL/Fas-induced OS mainly leads to necrosis. Furthermore, p62/SQSTM1 re-expression in the steatotic liver markedly reduced liver injury and improved liver regeneration. Innovation: This study is the first which demonstrates that reduced expression of p62/SQSTM1 plays a crucial role in posthepatectomy acute injury and delayed regeneration of steatotic liver, mainly via redox-dependent mechanisms. Conclusion : In the steatotic liver, reduced expression of p62/SQSTM1 induced FasL/Fas overexpression and suppressed antioxidant genes, mainly through Nrf-2 inactivation, which, along with the hypo-responsiveness of Akt, caused posthepatectomy necrotic/apoptotic liver injury and delayed regeneration, both mainly via a redox-dependent mechanism. Antioxid. Redox Signal . 21, 2515–2530.

13 January 2017 in BMC Gastroenterology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SHSanae Haga
Sanae Haga
YIYimin
Yimin
Michitaka OzakiMichitaka Ozaki
Michitaka Ozaki
Liver injury and regeneration involve complicated processes and are affected by various physio-pathological conditions. Surgically, severe liver injury after surgical resection often leads to fatal liver failure, especially with some underlying pathological conditions such as steatosis. Therefore, protection from the injury of hepatocytes and liver is a serious concern in various clinical settings. We studied the effects of the farnesoid X receptor (FXR) on cell survival and steatosis in mouse hepatocytes (AML12 mouse liver cells) and investigated their molecular mechanisms. We next studied whether or not FXR improves liver injury, regeneration and steatosis in a mouse model of partial hepatectomy (PH) with steatosis. An FXR-specific agonist, GW4064, induced expressions of the p62/SQSTM1 gene and protein in AML12 mouse liver cells. Because we previously reported p62/SQSTM1 as a key molecule for antioxidation and cell survival in hepatocytes, we next examined the activation of nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor-2 (Nrf2) and induction of the antioxidant molecules by GW4064. GW4064 activated Nrf2 and subsequently induced antioxidant molecules (Nrf2, catalase, HO-1, and thioredoxin). We also examined expressions of pro-survival and cell protective molecules associated with p62/SQSTM1. Expectedly, GW4064 induced phosphorylation of Akt, expression of the anti-apoptotic molecules (Bcl-xL and Bcl-2), and reduced harmful hepatic molecules (Fas ligand and Fas). GW4064 promoted hepatocyte survival, which was cancelled by p62/SQSTM1 siRNA. These findings suggest the potential relevance of the FXR-p62/SQSTM1 pathway for the survival and protection of hepatocytes. Furthermore, GW4064 induced the expression of small heterodimer partners (SHP) and suppressed liver X receptor (LXR)-induced steatosis in hepatocytes, expecting the in vivo protective effect of FXR on liver injury especially with steatosis. In the hepatectomy model of db/db mice with fatty liver, pre-treatment by GW4064 significantly reduced post-PH liver injury (serum levels of LDH, AST & ALT and histological study) and improved steatosis. The key molecules, p62/SQSTM1, Nrf2 and SHP were upregulated in fatty liver tissue by GW4064 treatment. The present study is the first to demonstrate the relevance of FXR-p62/SQSTM1 and -SHP in the protection against injury of hepatocytes and post-PH liver, especially with steatosis.

2 February 2011 in Cancer Science
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
KMKazuhiro Mino
Kazuhiro Mino
Michitaka OzakiMichitaka Ozaki
Michitaka Ozaki
KNKazuaki Nakanishi
Kazuaki Nakanishi
SHSanae Haga
Sanae Haga
MSMasanori Sato
Masanori Sato
STSatoru Todo
Satoru Todo
Currently, patients with peritoneal dissemination of gastric cancer must accept a poor prognosis because there is no standard effective therapy. To inhibit peritoneal dissemination it is important to inhibit interactions between extracellular matrices (ECM) and cell surface integrins, which are important for cancer cell adhesion. Although nuclear factor‐kappa B (NF‐κB) is involved in various processes in cancer progression, its involvement in the expression of integrins has not been elucidated. We used a novel NF‐κB inhibitor, dehydroxymethylepoxyquinomicin (DHMEQ), to study whether NF‐κB blocks cancer cell adhesion via integrins in a gastric cancer dissemination model in mice and found that DHMEQ is a potent suppressor of cancer cell dissemination. Dehydroxymethylepoxyquinomicin suppressed the NF‐κB activity of human gastric cancer cells NUGC‐4 and 44As3Luc and blocked the adhesion of cancer cells to ECM when compared with the control. Dehydroxymethylepoxyquinomicin also inhibited expression of integrin (α2, α3, β1) in in vitro studies. In the in vivo model, we injected 44As3Luc cells pretreated with DHMEQ into the peritoneal cavity of mice and performed peritoneal lavage after the injection of cancer cells. Viable cancer cells in the peritoneal cavities were evaluated sequentially by in vivo imaging. In mice injected with DHMEQ‐pretreated cells and lavaged, live cancer cells in the peritoneum were significantly reduced compared with the control, and these mice survived longer. These results indicate that DHMEQ could inhibit cancer cell adhesion to the peritoneum possibly by suppressing integrin expression. Nuclear factor‐kappa B inhibition may be a new therapeutic option for suppressing postoperative cancer dissemination. (Cancer Sci 2011; 102: 1052–1058)