We evaluated the mean platelet volume (MPV) to platelet ratio to determine its significance as a prognostic marker for early mortality in critically ill patients with suspected sepsis receiving early goal-directed therapy (EGDT). We retrospectively reviewed the records from a prospective EGDT registry and screened eligible adult patients who were admitted to the emergency department (ED) with severe sepsis and/or septic shock. The MPV/platelet ratio was estimated as the MPV value divided by the platelet count on each day of hospitalization. The clinical outcome was 28-day mortality. We included 120 patients receiving EGDT. In the multivariate Cox proportional hazard models, higher MPV/platelet ratios on admission (HR: 1.04; 95% CI: 1.015–1.066; P = 0.002) and at 24 h (HR: 1.032; 95% CI: 1.012–1.054; P = 0.002) were significant risk factors for mortality at 28 days. An increased trend for 28-day mortality was associated with a MPV/platelet ratio >3.71 on admission (HR: 4.274; 95% CI: 1.228–14.874; P = 0.023) and a higher MPV/platelet ratio (>6.49) at 24 h (HR: 2.719; 95% CI: 1.048–7.051; P = 0.04) in patients with severe sepsis receiving EGDT. In our study, MPV or platelet count alone did not predict shock and 28-day mortality in patients with severe sepsis receiving EGDT. However, the MPV/platelet ratio at ED admission and on day 1 is a promising prognostic marker for 28-day mortality in patients with severe sepsis.
Objective: To compare the GlideScope video laryngoscope (GVL) with the classic Macintosh laryngoscope in simulated airway scenarios of varying difficulty. Materials and methods: A prospective, crossover and randomised study was performed. Four airway scenarios were simulated using the Airsim model as follows: normal; cervical spine immobilisation; tongue oedema and combined cervical spine immobilisation with tongue oedema. Emergency physicians performed tracheal intubations using both devices in each of the scenarios. The time required to intubate, the success rate and the number of intubation attempts were recorded. At the end of each scenario, participants scored vocal cord visualisation using the percentage of glottic opening (POGO) visible and the subjective ease of intubation on a visual analogue scale (VAS). Results: All 25 participants successfully completed the study. There was no difference in the time required for successful tracheal intubation using the GVL compared with using the Macintosh laryngoscope in the four airway scenarios. Only one participant failed to intubate the trachea with the Macintosh laryngoscope for the combined scenario. There was a significant increase in POGO when using the GVL in the cervical spine immobilisation group (p = 0.027). The VAS score of the subjective ease of intubation was lower for the GVL than for the Macintosh laryngoscope device in difficult scenarios but this difference was not significant. Conclusion: This study suggests that the GVL could be an option for airway management even by emergency physicians with little experience and no training in its use.
Background: The need for rapid evaluation and treatment of acute stroke patients has been well documented. A computerized physician order entry (CPOE) system can improve communication and provide immediate access to information, which may be useful for an effective team approach program targeted to reduce in-hospital time delays. Methods: To reduce the time from a patient’s arrival at the emergency department to thrombolysis, a team approach program using CPOE was developed, and its efficacy was investigated by comparing time intervals from arrival to evaluation and intravenous tissue-type plasminogen activator (tPA) treatment before and after the implementation of the program. Results: Among 379 consecutive patients who were screened as potential candidates for thrombolysis, 25 patients (6.6%) received tPA during a 1-year period after initiation of the program. Fourteen patients were treated with tPA in the previous year. After program implementation, time from arrival to computed tomography scan was reduced from 34 to 19 min (p = 0.01). Time to report of complete blood count was also shortened from 52 to 33 min (p < 0.01). Finally, time from arrival to tPA treatment was reduced by 23 min (from 79 to 56 min; p < 0.01). Onset-to-door time tended to be longer after the program implementation (from 41 to 60 min; p = 0.14). Conclusions: Implementation of the CPOE-based team approach program significantly reduced time from emergency department arrival to evaluations and treatment.