Marcella Malavolti

Dr. Marcella Malavolti


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

21Years (2006-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
20 April 2021 in Circulation
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
TFTommaso Filippini
Tommaso Filippini
MMMarcella Malavolti
Marcella Malavolti
PWPaul K Whelton
Paul K Whelton
ANAndroniki Naska
Androniki Naska
NONicola Orsini
Nicola Orsini
Marco VincetiMarco Vinceti
Marco Vinceti
Background: The relationship between dietary sodium intake and blood pressure (BP) has been tested in clinical trials and nonexperimental human studies, indicating a direct association. The exact shape of the dose–response relationship has been difficult to assess in clinical trials because of the lack of random-effects dose–response statistical models that can include 2-arm comparisons. Methods: After performing a comprehensive literature search for experimental studies that investigated the BP effects of changes in dietary sodium intake, we conducted a dose–response meta-analysis using the new 1-stage cubic spline mixed-effects model. We included trials with at least 4 weeks of follow-up; 24-hour urinary sodium excretion measurements; sodium manipulation through dietary change or supplementation, or both; and measurements of systolic and diastolic BP at the beginning and end of treatment. Results: We identified 85 eligible trials with sodium intake ranging from 0.4 to 7.6 g/d and follow-up from 4 weeks to 36 months. The trials were conducted in participants with hypertension (n=65), without hypertension (n=11), or a combination (n=9). Overall, the pooled data were compatible with an approximately linear relationship between achieved sodium intake and mean systolic as well as diastolic BP, with no indication of a flattening of the curve at either the lowest or highest levels of sodium exposure. Results were similar for participants with or without hypertension, but the former group showed a steeper decrease in BP after sodium reduction. Intervention duration (≥12 weeks versus 4 to 11 weeks), type of study design (parallel or crossover), use of antihypertensive medication, and participants’ sex had little influence on the BP effects of sodium reduction. Additional analyses based on the BP effect of difference in sodium exposure between study arms at the end of the trial confirmed the results on the basis of achieved sodium intake. Conclusions: In this dose–response analysis of sodium reduction in clinical trials, we identified an approximately linear relationship between sodium intake and reduction in both systolic and diastolic BP across the entire range of dietary sodium exposure. Although this occurred independently of baseline BP, the effect of sodium reduction on level of BP was more pronounced in participants with a higher BP level.

1 December 2018 in Journal of Trace Elements in Medicine and Biology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
TFTommaso Filippini
Tommaso Filippini
SCSilvia Cilloni
Silvia Cilloni
MMMarcella Malavolti
Marcella Malavolti
FVFederica Violi
Federica Violi
CMCarlotta Malagoli
Carlotta Malagoli
Marco VincetiMarco Vinceti
Marco Vinceti

1 September 2020 in Environment International
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
TFTommaso Filippini
Tommaso Filippini
DTDuarte Torres
Duarte Torres
CLCarla Lopes
Carla Lopes
CCCatarina Carvalho
Catarina Carvalho
Pedro MoreiraPedro Moreira
Pedro Moreira
Marco VincetiMarco Vinceti
Marco Vinceti
Cadmium is a toxic heavy metal that has been implicated in breast cancer etiology, albeit with inconsistent results. To investigate the shape of the relation between cadmium exposure and breast cancer incidence and mortality in cohort studies. Following a literature search through April 14, 2020, we carried out a systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis to investigate the shape of the relation between cadmium exposure (assessed either through diet or urine excretion) and disease incidence and mortality. For inclusion, a study had to report incidence or mortality for breast cancer according to baseline cadmium exposure category; be a prospective cohort, case-cohort or nested case-control study with a minimum one-year follow-up, and reporting effect estimates for all exposure categories. Studies were evaluated using the ROBINS-E risk of bias tool. The effects in humans were assessed quantitatively using one-stage dose-response meta-analysis in a random effects meta-analytical model. We identified 10 studies eligible for inclusion in the dose-response meta-analysis, six based on cadmium dietary intake, and four on urinary excretion levels. We found a marginal and imprecise positive relation between dietary cadmium intake and breast cancer, and no association when urinary cadmium excretion was used for exposure assessment. Compared to no exposure, at 20 µg/day of cadmium intake the summary risk ratio was 1.12 (95% confidence interval 0.80-1.56), while at 2 µg/g creatinine of cadmium excretion the summary risk ratio was 0.89 (95% confidence interval 0.38-2.14). Analysis restricted to post-menopausal women showed no association between either dietary or urinary cadmium and subsequent breast cancer incidence and mortality. Overall, we found scant evidence of a positive association between cadmium and breast cancer. Available data were too limited to carry out stratified analyses according to age, smoking and hormone receptor status. Therefore, possible associations between cadmium exposure and breast cancer in selected subgroups cannot be entirely ruled out.

4 March 2022 in Current Hypertension Reports
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
TFTommaso Filippini
Tommaso Filippini
MMMarcella Malavolti
Marcella Malavolti
PWPaul K Whelton
Paul K Whelton
Marco VincetiMarco Vinceti
Marco Vinceti

1 March 2019 in Journal of Trace Elements in Medicine and Biology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
TFTommaso Filippini
Tommaso Filippini
STStefano Tancredi
Stefano Tancredi
CMCarlotta Malagoli
Carlotta Malagoli
SCSilvia Cilloni
Silvia Cilloni
MMMarcella Malavolti
Marcella Malavolti
MVMarco Vinceti
Marco Vinceti

1 November 2016 in International Journal of Hygiene and Environmental Health
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
CMCarlotta Malagoli
Carlotta Malagoli
Sofia CostanziniSofia Costanzini
Sofia Costanzini
JHJulia E. Heck
Julia E. Heck
MMMarcella Malavolti
Marcella Malavolti
GGGianfranco De Girolamo
Gianfranco De Girolamo
Marco VincetiMarco Vinceti
Marco Vinceti